Krzysztof, the acrobatic Yak 55m and others ...

Hi Krzysztof

It is something absolutely superb, portentous, with an aspect both on the runway and on the heights, admirable and that deserves admiration, not only for its visual aspect, but also for the sound of its engine; unique among all the airplanes of this sim. = (celestial music). Naturally, I mean the Yak 55m.

When we subject it to a vertical or inclined ascent, as it rises, the sound of its engine becomes progressively more lower (its sound frequency) to reach the highest point with zero speed or close to zero, that frequency is very lower . Then it comes to the descent, in which that frequency becomes increasingly acute as it gains speed. In my opinion, it is by far the best created sound of all airplanes; It is frankly superb. Until I listened carefully to the acoustics of this plane, I had not realized how important the flight is with a good sound on the plane.

When you approach the runway with progressive deceleration, the same thing happens to you, its acoustic frequency decreases and indicating that the engine decreases in r.p.m.

If we observe it diagonally (from the nose, pressing the function key F2), when approaching the runway to land, it constitutes a magnificent spectacle, not only visual, with its portentous aspect and its elegant appearance, but also with its " wonderful music. "

It is also impressive, the flight seen from the cockpit, with a very wide field of vision and a different sound as is logical. No acrobatic plane presents this extraordinary vision, accompanied by its own "music" from that point of the pilot's hearing.

For those of us who like acrobatics, this plane constitutes a "superb work of flying art", both visually and acoustically. His appearance slowly rolling down the runway after touching land, causes a deep admiration with his elegant rolling and his special music.

Of course Krzysztof, if you had already given me a great surprise and joy, when you gave us the Rutan Long_EZ, now with this Yak 55 m, you have filled the glass, without despising a few more, among them, the 3 previous acrobatic ones, and especially the canard (Kyushu J7W1 Shinden) which I also fly with great pleasure, although you have to improve it a lot, but that will come with time.

You have provided this Sim. a huge squad of planes, all completely different, which makes it much more valuable. We can choose from the oldest, to the most current. A whole range of possibilities for those who like the variety in flight and experimentation with different machines. In my opinion, all this contribution deserves a reward, for that reason, once again I insist: "you should give us the possibility of making donations from this Forum". I tell you with the greatest sincerity and appreciation: your enormous work of adaptation deserves it.

Once again, my deep gratitude for all you have given us.

Kind ragards: Delfin

I guess you mean the speed of the propeller. I'm not sure, but I do not think it has the propeller you mention.

Hi Overloaded

First of all, thanks for the video. Pity that another camera filmed acrobatic maneuvers, that would mean another plane following it, and that makes the operation more expensive.

Reflecting on what you said about the 'constant speed propeller', I think it is quite evident, that this plane (of this Sim.) Does not carry such a device, otherwise, the engine as the plane ascends or descends, would keep its r.m.p. and this does not happen here, but the opposite.

In the real world and with the real plane, I have no idea, nor if that acoustic frequency of the motor corresponds to the ones we hear here. I just say that I love the engine music of this model, as well as its ability to maneuver in acrobatics. I love his flying figure and also his music.

That the pilot could reach excessive speed ?. Well, as you know very well, all liquid fuel engines have a limiter of r.p.m. which consists in progressively limiting the entry of fuel from certain r.p.m. of the motor, with this, the motor is ensured, otherwise, it could disintegrate.

Regards: Delfin

Judging from his body language especially the face, he is not enjoying it very much. In the end, he will sweat.

Quote from Tomfa

Hello delphinpm,

Where did you get this model? Because on github.com I did not find it?

Cheers

Tomfa

Hi Tomfa

Here you have it, (right now) the first on the list

There are currently 51 models available in "Repositories"

Regards: Delfin

https://github.com/krzysk1?tab=repositories

Enjoy it, it's very good

I think you would get more out of the Yak 55M.

Regards; Delfin

Exactly, what systems do you mean?

I completely agree with you, in your first affirmation.

Regarding the second part of your statement: "many inoperable buttons". I also agree, although it is not only these planes, those that continue with these inactive functions, but in my case, I do not care too much. Of the acrobatic planes, what really matters to me, is that they correctly perform the acrobatic maneuvers, and of that, I do not have excessive complaints, except one: "feel the GES on my body", and that, I will never feel them.

I would very much like to feel the centrifugal force on my body in the acrobatic maneuvers, but I will not feel it in ... this incarnation. In the next? ... we'll see.

Simulators of simple aircraft, even commercial passenger ones, provide a certain similarity with reality: very few forces exerted on the pilot in the cockpit, etc. But, acrobatic is another story: those accelerations that leave it stuck to the seat, the same laterally when you do a roll that violence in the seat, that forces exerted on the body of the pilot according to the acrobatic maneuver you perform; that position of the body in an inverted flight, etc., etc. Those sensations of the real flight, we will never feel them in the simulator. No matter how complex the motion platforms are.

I will never feel those sensations, and I assure you that I want them, but I know that it is an impossible desire. This is what I would like to achieve, and much less important to me, are the visual aspects of the airplane and its modeling, if it has more or less switches in the cabin, etc. Well, that will always be my desire that I never feel satisfied; I understand, however, that other people value other characteristics of the airplane.

What else would the Ipacs team want to provide us with everything we demand, give us complete satisfaction?.

Of that I have no doubt, they know better than us the deficiencies of some models, and everything we demand, but simply, they can not do it.

However, I am sure that they try to give us maximum satisfaction according to their abilities. They are a small team, and despite everything, I think we have the Sim. technically better developed and of better quality than all existing in the market.

I have no doubt: The intention of Ipacs is to keep its users (customers), completely satisfied with their product. Among other reasons, because that guarantees success, both now and in the future, and in the future, a 'tornado' is approaching with great force on all current Sims in the market: Microsoft flight simulator 2020.

Regards: Delfin