F-15E and FA-18 Aerial Refuelling

  • I think that they will be able to do that in the coming 3 Years or more.... Who Knows? As the feature you requested is rather Complex to Implement.. But, I think if they are able to Bring out Aircraft Carrier with Arrested Hook and Catapult System with OffCourse Physically Animated Waters not Static Images then they might be able to do that ;):D

    Best Regards,

    Pratik

    • Official Post

    The tricky bit would be simulating the docking of the nozzle and the weight transfer. Because obviously we want the other aircraft to have proper physics when we can interact with them.


    Aircraft carrier, push back, aerial refueling etc. all require a new system to load models with physics which we haven't gotten around to programming yet. In my opinion it's just a matter.

    Regards,

    Jan

  • The tricky bit would be simulating the docking of the nozzle and the weight transfer. Because obviously we want the other aircraft to have proper physics when we can interact with them.


    Aircraft carrier, push back, aerial refueling etc. all require a new system to load models with physics which we haven't gotten around to programming yet. In my opinion it's just a matter.

    Exactly what I thought... :D:D . But No Spooking about "Animated Physical Water System".

    Best Regards,

    Pratik

  • Here you go got it at 2860ft at about 260 nots. just have to tweak it but have to be over water as it bumps on the land .


    OMG, That's so nice!!! I'm looking forward to try it

    Regards,

    PLΛY


    PC: RTX 3070, Ryzen 7 3700X, 16GB RAM, 1TB M.2 NVMe SSD,

    Setup: Honeycomb Alpha Yoke, Logitech Extreme 3D Pro Joystick and Saitek Throttle


    Phone: Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra 512 GB


    Flight Simulators: Aerofly FS 2, X-Plane 11, X-Plane 12 and MSFS 2020

    My Youtube Channel https://youtube.com/@P_L_A_Y

  • Refueling altitude is typically around 25000 feet (there are various altitudes, but that is a good generic one). The airplane tracks around a left turning oval, example length of straight track would be 34 nautical miles, separation of tracks (two sides of the oval) 14 NM. Speed would be around 310 knots for a KC135.

    Of course the Air Force (F15) and Navy (F18) have different refueling systems. Air Force uses the boom as shown in brunobellic's picture. The to be refueled plane position itself, then the boom controller in the tanker maneuvers the boom into the refueling trap.

    For Navy planes, there is either a drogue attached to the plane, or a drogue adapter attached to the boom of an Air Force Tanker. The drogue is tracking and the fighter pilots drives the plane refueling probe into the basket.


    PS: Hit me if someone needs a modeling done of the drogue basket.

    I think since this is purely artificial, that this is fine as is, it's close enough, and since one cannot deploy the probe on the F18 (AFAIK) then it doesn't matter that there is a proper basket, the boom will do. Just approach and fly close, and we'll call it "refueled".

  • The refueling in air is a nice idea. Good positions are either for practicing near San Diego and Pearl Harbor - or in the middle of the Pacific for the transfer from e.g. San Diego to Hawaii (whether someone flies that in the sim?).


    Anyway, now you would have to be able to have an identifier fly with you to find the target as well. I have already tried to simulate refueling with the simulated traffic machines in Hawaii - it was a disaster.


    Tschüss, Michael

    Tschüss, Michael (🍎🚁)


    Configurations:

    - MacBook Pro (16", 2021); Chip: Apple M1 Max; actual macOS || Thrustmaster TCA AIRBUS EDITION: 1x Sidestick, 2x Quadrant, 2x Quadrant Add-On || Pro-Flight-Trainer PUMA X

    - iPad (12,9", 4th Generation); actual iOS || nimbus steelseries