Any news on the release date so far ?

Teaser for the next major Aerofly FS version for mobile devices
-
-
Any news on the release date so far ?
Nope but as it is december now expect it to be within the next 2 weeks
-
- Official Post
Jet-Pack (IPACS) Has the 787 a cabin? Because on the eddf photo you can see something in the windows
I'm not sure if it will be included because the 787 is pretty detailed and has a large polygon count. It could be removed or stay, not sure.
-
Nope but as it is december now expect it to be within the next 2 weeks
Thanks buddy
-
I'm not sure if it will be included because the 787 is pretty detailed and has a large polygon count. It could be removed or stay, not sure.
Do you know if it will be included in the PC version?
-
- Official Post
Do you know if it will be included in the PC version?
At the moment the 787 cabin is visible in my PC developer version but of course it's not nearly as detailed as the rest that can be visited with the regular camera angles.
-
Hi Jan,
Will my first gen iPad Pro be able to deal with the new version?
Cant wait.
Regards
-
Nope but as it is december now expect it to be within the next 2 weeks
what if it doesn't release in 2 weeks?
-
Hi Jan,
Will my first gen iPad Pro be able to deal with the new version?
Cant wait.
Regards
PostRE: Teaser for the next major Aerofly FS version for mobile devices
We are still evaluating the exact system requirements for our new version, but so far it's looking very promising on iOS, e.g. all devices that supported Aerofly FS 2021 should work just fine. On Android we are faced with a few issues which we need to look into.
With this new version we will release a 'stable' version hopefully this year and try to publish more memory and GPU hungry features beginning next year. But again, we still need some time and we will only publish a new version if it runs…adminNovember 26, 2021 at 10:59 PM -
Is it decided yet if we will get over 700 airports for next mobile version I really hope so please let me know thanks keep up the great work cheers
-
💪I have to admit that IPACS has taken the lead in many ways, so keep up the good work
-
I have two questions.
1,Why are the blades of the engine clearly visible when the plane is in the air and rotating at high speed? Hasn't your engine rotation simulation been modified yet? Or is it the screenshot software?
2,What's wrong with this terrain?
🙏Please, I don't want to see engine blades spinning like a 777.
Good observation friend ... The engine blades of the boeing 777 are poorly simulated and it looks unreal, the engine blades at high speeds should practically not be seen .. I hope the animation of the 787 if you have the correct animation of the turbofan blades of the engine 😓 for example the a320 is very well designed CFM engine animation
-
I have two questions.
1,Why are the blades of the engine clearly visible when the plane is in the air and rotating at high speed? Hasn't your engine rotation simulation been modified yet? Or is it the screenshot software?
2,What's wrong with this terrain?
🙏Please, I don't want to see engine blades spinning like a 777.
1. When you pause the flight to go to replay, the blades will freeze in place, making it seem like the engines have turned off. That's currently in FS 2021 for the A320, A380, 777, etc.
2. I don't think anything's wrong with that terrain. On Google Earth, you can see that area has that shape. -
1. When you pause the flight to go to replay, the blades will freeze in place, making it seem like the engines have turned off. That's currently in FS 2021 for the A320, A380, 777, etc.
2. I don't think anything's wrong with that terrain. On Google Earth, you can see that area has that shape.I don't think that's normal.
-
Good observation friend ... The engine blades of the boeing 777 are poorly simulated and it looks unreal, the engine blades at high speeds should practically not be seen .. I hope the animation of the 787 if you have the correct animation of the turbofan blades of the engine 😓 for example the a320 is very well designed CFM engine animation
Yes, I agree.The 320 and 380 simulations are both very good.
-
Custom Liveries 😥?
-
2. I don't think anything's wrong with that terrain. On Google Earth, you can see that area has that shape.Sure? It looks like a huge crevasse that hasn’t been filled. Could be an attempted rendering of a valley but like..
-
For reference this is what apple maps shows of the area around EDDF, definitely no valleys or huge gaps in the ground around here 😅
-
-
Why is PC shadow clearer than mobile?
-