###############################
###############################
RELEASED:
FlyAgi Orthophoto NRW (FlyAgi.de)
###############################
###############################
Hello.
I have started to create some orthophotos for NRW in Germany based on freely available open data from here:
Digitale OrthophotosAs I'm not experienced creating stuff for Aerofly FS I think it's best to check with the community if I'm doing this right before I really get started. My workflow is currently looking like this:
- Set up the WMS server in Qgis
- Choose a region using a polygon
- Download a (Geo)Tiff file from that region
- Edit Tiff file in Gimp (so far color correction only)
- Reexport Tiff file
- Process the image with Geoconvert
This all works fine technically but the Geoncomvert process is pretty slow (the Tiff is 1.6 GB in size, uncompressed), especially for the level 14 resolution, this takes about 2 hours to finish - is this normal behaviour or did I feed Geonconvert with bad input? Is there anything I can do to optimize the process and speed things up?
Further, I chose to use a weak 120cm per pixel resolution for the raw image for now just for testing but this looks surprisingly good in the simulator, in fact it looks better than most of my 60cm per pixel images in X-Plane do so I would like to know if this resolution is good enough for the whole project? I don't have much experience with AFS 2 or AFS 4 so I don't know what is considered a high quality orthophoto by the community, I suspect my X-Plane standards probably can't keep up here because the imagery in AFS seems to look much more high res than is other simulators.
Regarding the Geoconvert process I found in the documentation that level 15 should be roughly 50cm per pixel resolution so I came up the following resolutions for other levels:
Level 15 ---> 50cm/pixel
Level 14 --->100cm/pixel
Level 13 ---> 200cm/pixel
Level 12 ---> 400cm/pixel
and so on. Is that correct?
I'm asking this because I found the level 13 images looked still pretty good in the simulator, much better than I would expect from a resolution of 2m per pixel.
Finally I have some screenshots to share and also a download if anyone is interested to see how my results look in the simulator. The scenery currently covers the City of Dortmund all of NRW and the colors are corrected to somewhat match the colors of the surrounding lower resolution textures from the Europe DLC.
FlyAgi Orthophoto NRW - FlyAgi.de
I would really appreciate some feedback regarding this project:
- Do you like the coloring? If I make it more green it will get a greenish tint like in MSFS and also it won't be as seamless with the surrounding lower resolution scenery.
- The current scenery is 120cm per pixel and only rendered up to level 14 - is this good enough?
- Is there any interrest at all?
And, to the experienced designers, some more questions:
- Am I doing this right?
- Can I optimize the workflow somehow?
Thanks to everyone,
Agi