Concorde Now Available for Aerofly FS 4!

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

Enrico, du bist doch der 2. Mann im Cockpit.

Aber danke, schön dass die Kiste dir Spaß macht.

Mir macht Aerofly FS 2 (4) schon von Anfang an Spass,nur das ich öfters mal eine Kritik abgebe die nicht jedermann gefällt!!

Auch wenn öfters darüber Gelacht wird,wenn ich schreibe der 2 Mann im Cockpit (Außenansich) und Streifen am Himmel.

Für mich ist einfach Flugsimulation so realistisch wie möglich ,und dazu gehört das für mich einfach mit dazu.

Trotzdem vielen Dank für Aerofly FS 4.

Enrico

Jet-Pack (IPACS) How do you limit Concorde to <Mach 1.0 when flying over populated areas and using CoPilot to follow a route?

Regards,

Ray

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

The copilot doesn't know when he's above an ocean or not.

“You gotta keep an eye on those inexperienced copilots”

Dear Jet-Pack (IPACS) (Aerofly FS 4)

It's not linked to the Concorde, but I found a problem out because of her.

It was at the moment to intercept the LOC of Dublin EIDW ILS28 shown as 111.3 MHz in the flight planner UI. But no interception, bla bla bla, I fought with the autopilot for another try. Same, missed. Again another try when suddenly I changed the frequency to 111.35 MHz in the Condorde. And OK.

The UI may not display the all numbers or the value on the UI is false.

Best regards.

Oh by the way, a video of the most known competitor about Concorde showed me how the IPACS Concorde is GORGEOUS.

One more thing, is there a way to simulate a yoke with the Thrusmaster Airbus joystick (finally, like it happens in your Airbus A320/A380, it is as if the joystick shifts a virtual yoke)?

@IPACS
Thanks for the Concorde!

(Click on picture...)

I know this is not as simple as it sounds, but it would be great if you made some trijets classic airliners, like the DC-10 or MD-11, Boeing 727 or a L1011 Tristar.

Quote from cristianodesa

I know this is not as simple as it sounds, but it would be great if you made some trijets classic airliners, like the DC-10 or MD-11, Boeing 727 or a L1011 Tristar.

I agree.

Quote from cristianodesa

I know this is not as simple as it sounds, but it would be great if you made some trijets classic airliners, like the DC-10 or MD-11, Boeing 727 or a L1011 Tristar.

I agree 100%, I know they could after seeing how they made concorde so well

KLAX to KEWR 2:11

Prolly broke some windows.

Screwed up the descent and had to shutttle down to lose speed and altitude and ...also speed.

Great fun. Thanks IPACS.

Does the Concorde have any basic fuel and weight simulation? Concorde would perform quite differently depending on the weight, for example with a full load it would take 40 seconds from opening the throttles until rotation at 190+ knots. At these weights, after the noise abatement procedure the initial climb had to be quite carefully managed. At lower weights for training or charter flights, it really would perform like a rocket, with the takeoff roll taking less that 20 seconds.

The ‘co-pilot’ flight engineer must do the Mach trim fuel ballast transfer for us?

Hey everyone. Currently I don't own FS4 but I saw the Concorde is out. It has always been a dream of mine to fly the Concorde in VR. I just had a few questions about it. Does it come with cold and dark functionality? Also, does the engineer panel work? I fly in real life and I'm a pretty casual simmer so I'm not expecting it to be study level. I was just hoping at least power off and on were possible.

Quote from Beausuveas

Hey everyone. Currently I don't own FS4 but I saw the Concorde is out. It has always been a dream of mine to fly the Concorde in VR. I just had a few questions about it. Does it come with cold and dark functionality? Also, does the engineer panel work? I fly in real life and I'm a pretty casual simmer so I'm not expecting it to be study level. I was just hoping at least power off and on were possible.

No cold and dark at the moment, no working engineer panel.

Quote from Ethan's Aviation

No cold and dark at the moment, no working engineer panel. and also the Concorde is not able to achieve Mach 2.01 due to the FL500 height limitation of FS4.

I'm curious to know how AEFS calculates the critical Mach for swept back wings?

In such a wing, is the cosine of the full forward speed taken into consideration, or even a lower value due to the wings being finite, in order to proportionally reduce the effective Cl ? Like described i.e. in here: Why Do Fast Aircraft Have Swept Wings? | Boldmethod

And, if indeed this is taken into consideration where can I find references to the correction in the Wiki?