You like to speculate, but have you ever wondered if anyone likes your speculations?
This threat is intended for speculations, whether people think it's good or not 😂
Development Teaser: A350 work in progress
-
-
You like to speculate, but have you ever wondered if anyone likes your speculations?
What kind of question is this lol it's a thread where you're supposed to speculate and guess things I just pointed out that the schematics are from an a359 and like i said before to me it doesn't matter which version of it we get atleast we are getting an a350
-
What kind of question is this lol it's a thread where you're supposed to speculate and guess things I just pointed out that the schematics are from an a359 and like i said before to me it doesn't matter which version of it we get atleast we are getting an a350
I was ironic in my question
-
The simultaneous release of 1000 and 900 is clearly the best answer to avoid arguments
This is the best result.
-
Irony is the Airbus A321 being released which was bigger than the Aerofly original.
Perhaps one token smaller plane could be offered, it would prove both that it is possible and that the will to actually do it exists.
-
Irony is the Airbus A321 being released which was bigger than the Aerofly original.
Perhaps one token smaller plane could be offered, it would prove both that it is possible and that the will to actually do it exists.
I am curious about this, Jet-Pack (IPACS)
Why the A320 before the A321 given the way you initially model aircraft?
-
I am curious about this, Jet-Pack (IPACS)
Why the A320 before the A321 given the way you initially model aircraft?
The a320 has been in the game since aerofly fs 1 I believe or it was aerofly fs 2 I asked them if this was before they started using the bigger aircraft first system and they liked it so I think the reason for that is because they previously didn't follow that system
-
If you maintain firm questioning, you need to provide firm evidence, such as: how can you be certain that extending A320 to A321 would require less effort than shortening 787-10 to 787-9,.
The A320 appeared very early and was purchased from a third party, possibly exceeding the official plan to develop a new aircraft. The A320 became the A321. This can only prove that extending the fuselage is feasible, but it cannot prove that the working hours of manufacturing personnel are shorter
Extending efficiency is lower than shortening efficiency, using A320 as an example is not appropriate. The official has thoroughly explained this matter
-
This model from Aerosoft looks pretty close to the A320/21s in Aerofly, for anyone curious
-
Now it's 0, get 1 first, then discuss 2
-
Firstly, use the basic framework as a benchmark, and then extend various versions (aircraft model) based on the basic framework.
-
how do i check all the leaks so far/ offical post?
-
how do i check all the leaks so far/ offical post?
You can view the 《Development Teasers for new Aircraft》，It is at the top of this forum.
-
I cant find it tho -
I cant find it tho
It's right here.
-
And A350-900 Aeroflot please
P.s. Don't forget to print names of famous people on the side of the nose. This is the trick of Aeroflot liveries
-
Didn't they say the -1000 will come first?
-
Didn't they say the -1000 will come first?
It will be modeled first, but they never said it would be released first
What if we may actually get both? 🤔
-
I really want the 900 as the 1000 gear tilt sucks and looks like a knock-off 777 landing gear
