GSE vehicle that move around and people doing the work.
G1000 based aircraft! Would love a PC-12!
Please stop making wish on new aircraft’s, otherwise this sim will never grow.
IMHO, the sim needs more need actual novelties in the simulation features to improve the immersion and realism of the sim:
World and Scenery:
* More complex weather system.
* Water masking and rendering.
* Road masking and live ground traffic (we used to have them in the old AFS2 Florida scenery but somehow don’t see any progress for years).
* Better (more accurate and various) building autogen. The current autogen model style looks good in some European countries like Germany, but as the map is extending to the whole world, those autogens can look strange. In addition, there are many incorrectly placed buildings or trees around the airport which look very strange.
* Terrain in the airports: bumps are everywhere between runways and taxiways in many major airports around the globe.
* More realistic lights (runway, runway threshold, taxiway, street)
System Depth (add to existing aircraft）
* Fuel and payload.
* ATC and radio system.
* More functional FMC.
Details that add immersions
* Particle effects.
* Better visual or auditory effects, e.g, touchdown feedback, sound of the gears and aircraft body shacking when the plane is moving on the ground. More realistic vibrations at the wing tips etc.
I understand that many of these features take massive resources to research and could be much more difficult to achieve comparing with making a shorter variation of the A320. And I understand that the focus of Aerofly is on the mobile end and some of these features can be to demanding. But I really enjoy the easy flying experience in Aerofly and hope to continue enjoying it but with a bit more immersion.
I would vote for a coastlines fix. Some shorelines look good (or at least seamlessly blended with the ocean textures), but others are still a mess. Not sure how difficult this would be, but would improve the VR simulation experience
I also hope for more features instead of more content.
I would like to see more recent AIRAC navdata or at least the possibility to provide our own navdata via Navigraph or Aviaplanner (when available).
The following statements are purely personal speculations
The slope observed at the airport is caused by low precision elevation data, while the irregular coastline lacks higher precision ground texture data. Randomly tampering with these data may lead to confusion in the terrain database. Airport data and terrain data are completely different. An effective solution is to replace them with higher precision data, replacing global data with higher resolution, such as 3-meter resolution, which may require significant funds to purchase and obtain commercial use licenses,
IPACS does not have surveying satellites, and bearing these costs would incur significant costs, such as balancing income and expenses
The above statements are purely personal speculations
Useable jetbridges.
Budget airline passenger queues on the airport apron near 737s. The queue need not move.
Better with a new 737-800 or MAX 8/10.
Display MorePlease stop making wish on new aircraft’s, otherwise this sim will never grow.
IMHO, the sim needs more need actual novelties in the simulation features to improve the immersion and realism of the sim:
World and Scenery:* More complex weather system.
* Water masking and rendering.
* Road masking and live ground traffic (we used to have them in the old AFS2 Florida scenery but somehow don’t see any progress for years).
* Better (more accurate and various) building autogen. The current autogen model style looks good in some European countries like Germany, but as the map is extending to the whole world, those autogens can look strange. In addition, there are many incorrectly placed buildings or trees around the airport which look very strange.
* Terrain in the airports: bumps are everywhere between runways and taxiways in many major airports around the globe.
* More realistic lights (runway, runway threshold, taxiway, street)
System Depth (add to existing aircraft）* Fuel and payload.
* ATC and radio system.
* More functional FMC.
Details that add immersions
* Particle effects.
* Better visual or auditory effects, e.g, touchdown feedback, sound of the gears and aircraft body shacking when the plane is moving on the ground. More realistic vibrations at the wing tips etc.
I understand that many of these features take massive resources to research and could be much more difficult to achieve comparing with making a shorter variation of the A320. And I understand that the focus of Aerofly is on the mobile end and some of these features can be to demanding. But I really enjoy the easy flying experience in Aerofly and hope to continue enjoying it but with a bit more immersion.
No, seriously, so many features could be added instead of a plane, so many small quality of life features
All of these are great I would like to see the 747F and Embrarer175 and 3 D airports in Texas.
A few other thing is moving water ATC and Multiplayer
Proper gliding task on the flight planner:
- Start and stop on any point in the map (not just airfields)
- Straight legs
- Options for the turn points (angle and radius).
hopefully there is multiplayer soon,I would love to fly with all of ya'll
Weather like: Rain, Snow, New Clouds, Realistic Visibility settings, Hail and so on.
Display MorePlease stop making wish on new aircraft’s, otherwise this sim will never grow.
IMHO, the sim needs more need actual novelties in the simulation features to improve the immersion and realism of the sim:
World and Scenery:* More complex weather system.
* Water masking and rendering.
* Road masking and live ground traffic (we used to have them in the old AFS2 Florida scenery but somehow don’t see any progress for years).
* Better (more accurate and various) building autogen. The current autogen model style looks good in some European countries like Germany, but as the map is extending to the whole world, those autogens can look strange. In addition, there are many incorrectly placed buildings or trees around the airport which look very strange.
* Terrain in the airports: bumps are everywhere between runways and taxiways in many major airports around the globe.
* More realistic lights (runway, runway threshold, taxiway, street)
System Depth (add to existing aircraft）* Fuel and payload.
* ATC and radio system.
* More functional FMC.
Details that add immersions
* Particle effects.
* Better visual or auditory effects, e.g, touchdown feedback, sound of the gears and aircraft body shacking when the plane is moving on the ground. More realistic vibrations at the wing tips etc.
I understand that many of these features take massive resources to research and could be much more difficult to achieve comparing with making a shorter variation of the A320. And I understand that the focus of Aerofly is on the mobile end and some of these features can be to demanding. But I really enjoy the easy flying experience in Aerofly and hope to continue enjoying it but with a bit more immersion.
I can only agree with that
A few other thing is moving water ATC and Multiplayer
The only problem with multiplayer would be lag for lower end devices.
RNAV or GPS capable GA aircraft. People who say that old steam gauges is cool and enough: it's only for US. In Europe and other countries you basically can't really fly without RNAV navigation.
A forum member poll restriction, once every ten years.
