1. Aerofly Homepage
  2. Forum
    1. Dashboard
    2. Unresolved Threads
  3. Blog
    1. Articles
  4. Dashboard
  5. Gallery
    1. Aerofly FS 4
    2. Aerofly FS Mobile
  • Login
  • Register
  • Search
This Thread
  • Everywhere
  • This Thread
  • This Forum
  • Articles
  • Forum
  • Files
  • Pages
  • Gallery
  • Blog Articles
  • More Options
  1. IPACS Aerofly Forum
  2. Forum
  3. Aerofly FS (mobile version for Apple iOS and Google Android)
  4. Mobile Discussions

A350 feedback

  • Gravitational lensing
  • April 11, 2025 at 2:18 PM
  • SkyX
    Professional
    Reactions Received
    308
    Points
    4,835
    Posts
    257
    Images
    159
    • April 11, 2025 at 6:44 PM
    • #21

    Oops I created another thread, didn't see this one.

    Aviationly,

    SkyX

  • Gravitational lensing
    Professional
    Reactions Received
    330
    Points
    3,066
    Posts
    486
    Images
    9
    • April 11, 2025 at 6:49 PM
    • #22
    Quote from SkyX

    Oops I created another thread, didn't see this one.

    It s okay

    Yes, it is necessary to replace it with an A350 cabin video. However, I seem to have read an article somewhere saying that the A350 cabin video is in color, but I'm not sure.

  • Jeffrey2076
    Beginner
    Reactions Received
    3
    Points
    48
    Posts
    1
    Images
    2
    • April 11, 2025 at 9:56 PM
    • #23

    The aircraft is stunning, but I feel a bit strange with the winglets 🥲🥲

  • AeroflyBro
    Student
    Reactions Received
    35
    Points
    315
    Posts
    50
    • April 12, 2025 at 12:44 AM
    • #24

    Inaccuracy, when you calculate the performance for takeoff, side tablet can calculate a huge negative number (That calculated about -273 for my take off from KSMF)

  • Gravitational lensing
    Professional
    Reactions Received
    330
    Points
    3,066
    Posts
    486
    Images
    9
    • April 12, 2025 at 12:50 AM
    • #25
    Quote from AeroflyBro

    Inaccuracy, when you calculate the performance for takeoff, side tablet can calculate a huge negative number (That calculated about -273 for my take off from KSMF)

    What are you discussing?

    Alright, I understand.

  • Gravitational lensing
    Professional
    Reactions Received
    330
    Points
    3,066
    Posts
    486
    Images
    9
    • April 12, 2025 at 12:54 AM
    • #26
    Quote from Jeffrey2076

    The aircraft is stunning, but I feel a bit strange with the winglets 🥲🥲

    I assume you're discussing that the shape is a bit strange.

    This makes it clear at a glance. If you still can't distinguish, pay attention to the distance from Virgin to the wingtip.

    Images

    • IMG_20250412_062353.jpg
      • 170.01 kB
      • 900 × 1,200
    • IMG_20250412_062745.jpg
      • 114.07 kB
      • 799 × 1,200
    • IMG_20250412_062510.jpg
      • 130.75 kB
      • 900 × 1,200
  • RJFF
    Student
    Reactions Received
    40
    Points
    522
    Posts
    85
    • April 12, 2025 at 2:04 AM
    • #27
    Quote from Gravitational lensing

    ⑥When opening or closing the flaps, the sound is a bit strange, seems a little off-key.


    ⑦After the plane takes off, the main landing gear quickly returns to an angle parallel to the fuselage, but the Aerofly A350 needs to wait about 5 seconds.

    I guess it's the problem of audio sampling, which may be directly through a recorded audio sampling and forcibly using the audio editing function, so as to achieve the effect of falling tone, so it's unnatural.I tested monitor headphones wearing an iron triangle in the game, and many audio of 350 had great flaws.

  • Gravitational lensing
    Professional
    Reactions Received
    330
    Points
    3,066
    Posts
    486
    Images
    9
    • April 12, 2025 at 2:35 AM
    • #28
    Quote from RJFF

    I guess it's the problem of audio sampling, which may be directly through a recorded audio sampling and forcibly using the audio editing function, so as to achieve the effect of falling tone, so it's unnatural.I tested monitor headphones wearing an iron triangle in the game, and many audio of 350 had great flaws.

    The sound of the flaps doesn't need modulation; it can be used directly as recorded. Regardless of the situation—whether the flaps are set to position 1, position 2, or fully extended—the sound they produce remains the same.

  • RJFF
    Student
    Reactions Received
    40
    Points
    522
    Posts
    85
    • April 12, 2025 at 4:07 AM
    • #29
    Quote from Gravitational lensing

    The sound of the flaps doesn't need modulation; it can be used directly as recorded. Regardless of the situation—whether the flaps are set to position 1, position 2, or fully extended—the sound they produce remains the same.

    I saw through the translator that you said that the sound of the flap was out of tune, and I also felt that the audio was out of line and stuck in the game, so I said it might be an audio sampling problem.Secondly, I feel that the sound sampling of the engine of 350 seems to explode the level. When the volume is amplified to a certain extent but not the maximum, the audio quality seems to be burnt out.

  • Gravitational lensing
    Professional
    Reactions Received
    330
    Points
    3,066
    Posts
    486
    Images
    9
    • April 12, 2025 at 5:08 AM
    • #30
    Quote from RJFF

    I saw through the translator that you said that the sound of the flap was out of tune, and I also felt that the audio was out of line and stuck in the game, so I said it might be an audio sampling problem.Secondly, I feel that the sound sampling of the engine of 350 seems to explode the level. When the volume is amplified to a certain extent but not the maximum, the audio quality seems to be burnt out.

    The sound has indeed changed. I think it should be used directly after recording, so I speculate that the file was modified. The sound of the flaps has changed noticeably compared to reality.

    The high-frequency chainsaw-like sound of the engine is quite noticeable, but I haven’t had time to listen carefully to the other sounds yet.

  • RJFF
    Student
    Reactions Received
    40
    Points
    522
    Posts
    85
    • April 12, 2025 at 6:04 AM
    • #31
    Quote from Gravitational lensing

    The sound has indeed changed. I think it should be used directly after recording, so I speculate that the file was modified. The sound of the flaps has changed noticeably compared to reality.

    The high-frequency chainsaw-like sound of the engine is quite noticeable, but I haven’t had time to listen carefully to the other sounds yet.

    The high frequency is fine, but the low frequency is completely in a daze. You can't tell what is ringing by listening to the sound outside the cabin. You should do noise reduction. The sound field of the flap when it is deployed and retracted is far away. Maybe it was really intercepted from a video and installed ...

  • RJFF
    Student
    Reactions Received
    40
    Points
    522
    Posts
    85
    • April 12, 2025 at 7:01 AM
    • #32

    I forgot to add that the sound quality of the small version updated today has improved on my device. The reason why the previous comments said this is based on the fact that before the update, someone lost his mind. Just watch him go crazy quietly and respect the fate of others.

  • Gravitational lensing
    Professional
    Reactions Received
    330
    Points
    3,066
    Posts
    486
    Images
    9
    • April 12, 2025 at 10:39 AM
    • #33

    ⑧ Aircraft external dynamic light source

    The dynamic light source of the winglight is somewhat too bright during the day; even in direct sunlight, it cannot suppress the winglight's brightness.

    Conversely, the dynamic light source of the camera light is somewhat dim at night.

    Images

    • Screenshot_2025-04-12-16-29-34-166_com.aerofly.aeroflyfsg1.jpg
      • 245.19 kB
      • 1,920 × 864
    • Screenshot_2025-04-12-16-44-00-683_com.aerofly.aeroflyfsg1.jpg
      • 152.95 kB
      • 1,920 × 864
  • Phil747
    Intermediate
    Reactions Received
    283
    Points
    2,841
    Posts
    343
    Images
    39
    • April 12, 2025 at 10:46 AM
    • #34
    Quote from Gravitational lensing

    ①Wait a few more seconds, and the landing gear will gradually tilt to the correct angle.

    ② Trust me, the proper A350-1000 wingtip will look much better.

    Now i know airbus updated the winglets for the a350 sometime but these current ones are off the -900 right? Or theyre just pre-refresh winglets

  • Gravitational lensing
    Professional
    Reactions Received
    330
    Points
    3,066
    Posts
    486
    Images
    9
    • April 12, 2025 at 11:19 AM
    • #35
    Quote from Phil747

    Now i know airbus updated the winglets for the a350 sometime but these current ones are off the -900 right? Or theyre just pre-refresh winglets

    During the development of the Aerofly A350, the wingtips were not modified. The wingtips currently used are still those of the -900, simply installed on the -1000.

  • Overloaded
    Master
    Reactions Received
    1,031
    Points
    12,446
    Posts
    1,797
    Images
    98
    • April 12, 2025 at 11:51 AM
    • #36

    The meal tray retract hot spot is in the centre of the outer panel, it only took me 20 distressing minutes to work that out.

  • Jet-Pack (IPACS)
    Master of aircraft TMD
    Reactions Received
    10,722
    Points
    47,361
    Posts
    6,960
    Blog Articles
    88
    • April 12, 2025 at 11:57 AM
    • Official Post
    • #37
    Quote from Overloaded

    The meal tray retract hot spot is in the centre of the outer panel, it only took me 20 distressing minutes to work that out.

    Yes, it's where the grip would be on the underside, unfortunately it's not really visible.

    Regards,

    Jan

    • Previous Official Post
    • Next Official Post
  • Gravitational lensing
    Professional
    Reactions Received
    330
    Points
    3,066
    Posts
    486
    Images
    9
    • April 12, 2025 at 12:58 PM
    • #38
    Quote from Gravitational lensing

    ⑧ Aircraft external dynamic light source

    The dynamic light source of the winglight is somewhat too bright during the day; even in direct sunlight, it cannot suppress the winglight's brightness.

    Conversely, the dynamic light source of the camera light is somewhat dim at night.

    Some light source brightness contrast images

    TAXI CAMERA

    Images

    • IMG_20250412_185529.jpg
      • 107.38 kB
      • 751 × 1,200
    • IMG_20250412_185519.jpg
      • 49.82 kB
      • 540 × 1,200
  • Xerofang
    Student
    Reactions Received
    86
    Points
    522
    Posts
    74
    • April 12, 2025 at 1:05 PM
    • #39

    Personally, I think it would be a good idea to increase the volume of the V1 call.

  • Phil747
    Intermediate
    Reactions Received
    283
    Points
    2,841
    Posts
    343
    Images
    39
    • April 12, 2025 at 1:07 PM
    • #40
    Quote from Gravitational lensing

    I assume you're discussing that the shape is a bit strange.

    This makes it clear at a glance. If you still can't distinguish, pay attention to the distance from Virgin to the wingtip.

    (in reference to -900 vs -1000 winglet post)
    It doesn’t seem totally off, given how the back of the -900 winglet is completely straight whereas the -1000’s is slightly curved, and so is the aerofly one. I suppose it’s a matter of the angle instead? The -1000’s is a lot less sharply curved upwards unlike the 900’s?

Similar Threads

  • Frage an ipacs

    • Airbusfanflo
    • February 26, 2025 at 5:15 PM
    • Mobile Discussions
  • Development Teaser: A350 work in progress

    • Jet-Pack (IPACS)
    • June 14, 2024 at 10:06 AM
    • Mobile Discussions
  • what can we expect for 2025

    • THYAGOSANTOS
    • January 2, 2025 at 11:28 PM
    • General Discussions

Users Viewing This Thread

  • 3 Guests
  1. Privacy Policy
  2. Legal Notice
Powered by WoltLab Suite™ 6.1.8