Oops I created another thread, didn't see this one.

A350 feedback
-
-
Oops I created another thread, didn't see this one.
It s okay
Yes, it is necessary to replace it with an A350 cabin video. However, I seem to have read an article somewhere saying that the A350 cabin video is in color, but I'm not sure.
-
The aircraft is stunning, but I feel a bit strange with the winglets 🥲🥲
-
Inaccuracy, when you calculate the performance for takeoff, side tablet can calculate a huge negative number (That calculated about -273 for my take off from KSMF)
-
Inaccuracy, when you calculate the performance for takeoff, side tablet can calculate a huge negative number (That calculated about -273 for my take off from KSMF)
What are you discussing?
Alright, I understand.
-
The aircraft is stunning, but I feel a bit strange with the winglets 🥲🥲
I assume you're discussing that the shape is a bit strange.
This makes it clear at a glance. If you still can't distinguish, pay attention to the distance from Virgin to the wingtip.
-
⑥When opening or closing the flaps, the sound is a bit strange, seems a little off-key.
⑦After the plane takes off, the main landing gear quickly returns to an angle parallel to the fuselage, but the Aerofly A350 needs to wait about 5 seconds.
I guess it's the problem of audio sampling, which may be directly through a recorded audio sampling and forcibly using the audio editing function, so as to achieve the effect of falling tone, so it's unnatural.I tested monitor headphones wearing an iron triangle in the game, and many audio of 350 had great flaws.
-
I guess it's the problem of audio sampling, which may be directly through a recorded audio sampling and forcibly using the audio editing function, so as to achieve the effect of falling tone, so it's unnatural.I tested monitor headphones wearing an iron triangle in the game, and many audio of 350 had great flaws.
The sound of the flaps doesn't need modulation; it can be used directly as recorded. Regardless of the situation—whether the flaps are set to position 1, position 2, or fully extended—the sound they produce remains the same.
-
The sound of the flaps doesn't need modulation; it can be used directly as recorded. Regardless of the situation—whether the flaps are set to position 1, position 2, or fully extended—the sound they produce remains the same.
I saw through the translator that you said that the sound of the flap was out of tune, and I also felt that the audio was out of line and stuck in the game, so I said it might be an audio sampling problem.Secondly, I feel that the sound sampling of the engine of 350 seems to explode the level. When the volume is amplified to a certain extent but not the maximum, the audio quality seems to be burnt out.
-
I saw through the translator that you said that the sound of the flap was out of tune, and I also felt that the audio was out of line and stuck in the game, so I said it might be an audio sampling problem.Secondly, I feel that the sound sampling of the engine of 350 seems to explode the level. When the volume is amplified to a certain extent but not the maximum, the audio quality seems to be burnt out.
The sound has indeed changed. I think it should be used directly after recording, so I speculate that the file was modified. The sound of the flaps has changed noticeably compared to reality.
The high-frequency chainsaw-like sound of the engine is quite noticeable, but I haven’t had time to listen carefully to the other sounds yet.
-
The sound has indeed changed. I think it should be used directly after recording, so I speculate that the file was modified. The sound of the flaps has changed noticeably compared to reality.
The high-frequency chainsaw-like sound of the engine is quite noticeable, but I haven’t had time to listen carefully to the other sounds yet.
The high frequency is fine, but the low frequency is completely in a daze. You can't tell what is ringing by listening to the sound outside the cabin. You should do noise reduction. The sound field of the flap when it is deployed and retracted is far away. Maybe it was really intercepted from a video and installed ...
-
I forgot to add that the sound quality of the small version updated today has improved on my device. The reason why the previous comments said this is based on the fact that before the update, someone lost his mind. Just watch him go crazy quietly and respect the fate of others.
-
⑧ Aircraft external dynamic light source
The dynamic light source of the winglight is somewhat too bright during the day; even in direct sunlight, it cannot suppress the winglight's brightness.
Conversely, the dynamic light source of the camera light is somewhat dim at night.
-
①Wait a few more seconds, and the landing gear will gradually tilt to the correct angle.
② Trust me, the proper A350-1000 wingtip will look much better.
Now i know airbus updated the winglets for the a350 sometime but these current ones are off the -900 right? Or theyre just pre-refresh winglets
-
Now i know airbus updated the winglets for the a350 sometime but these current ones are off the -900 right? Or theyre just pre-refresh winglets
During the development of the Aerofly A350, the wingtips were not modified. The wingtips currently used are still those of the -900, simply installed on the -1000.
-
The meal tray retract hot spot is in the centre of the outer panel, it only took me 20 distressing minutes to work that out.
-
- Official Post
The meal tray retract hot spot is in the centre of the outer panel, it only took me 20 distressing minutes to work that out.
Yes, it's where the grip would be on the underside, unfortunately it's not really visible.
-
⑧ Aircraft external dynamic light source
The dynamic light source of the winglight is somewhat too bright during the day; even in direct sunlight, it cannot suppress the winglight's brightness.
Conversely, the dynamic light source of the camera light is somewhat dim at night.
Some light source brightness contrast images
TAXI CAMERA
-
Personally, I think it would be a good idea to increase the volume of the V1 call.
-
I assume you're discussing that the shape is a bit strange.
This makes it clear at a glance. If you still can't distinguish, pay attention to the distance from Virgin to the wingtip.
(in reference to -900 vs -1000 winglet post)
It doesn’t seem totally off, given how the back of the -900 winglet is completely straight whereas the -1000’s is slightly curved, and so is the aerofly one. I suppose it’s a matter of the angle instead? The -1000’s is a lot less sharply curved upwards unlike the 900’s? -