The Boeing 777 and the 777F doesn't callout V1 when rotation speed is reached. Is this an ongoing issue or purposely not implemented in the simulator right now? Thanks.
Boeing 777 V1 Absent
-
The Boeing 777 and the 777F doesn't callout V1 when rotation speed is reached. Is this an ongoing issue or purposely not implemented in the simulator right now? Thanks.
I wonder how hard it is to implement V1 callout on planes without forgetting the 787, a380
-
- Official Post
It's neither an ongoing issue nor a purposely not implemented. I just haven't gotten around to adding it to that airplane as well.
-
It's neither an ongoing issue nor a purposely not implemented. I just haven't gotten around to adding it to that airplane as well.
Please do something the 777s really deserve the V1 callout by now
-
The 777 have the potential to be the best long haul aircraft in the Sim if it's given some love and attention it deserves. Like.. There's no sound of the packs. The cockpit is too quiet especially when a the ground.
-
The 777 have the potential to be the best long haul aircraft in the Sim if it's given some love and attention it deserves. Like.. There's no sound of the packs. The cockpit is too quiet especially when a the ground.
True,, I don't know why the developers rush to release new planes and the current ones are incomplete 😆,, same goes to the 787 doesn't even have the APU sound
-
It's neither an ongoing issue nor a purposely not implemented. I just haven't gotten around to adding it to that airplane as well.
Why don't you add it then like right now 🤔 😆
-
- Official Post
Why don't you add it then like right now 🤔 😆
Because we're working on other things...
-
The take off performance calculations produce V1 and Vr values for relatively short runways and for especially heavy take off weights. The Aerofly aircraft is light and the V speeds look like they are for a single runway and environment example, one typical of a major airport’s long runway.
A very long runway might have the brake to a complete stop cut-off point far, far down the runway with an unusually high ground speed achieved thanks to the great remaining runway distance available. The same take off example reaches the safe take off speed to satisfy the required multi engine (allowing for engine failures) large plane’s initial climb performance, at a lower speed than the calculated brake to a complete stop cut-off point. The Vr has been established, the V1 is not allowed to be taken as higher than Vr so in this example V1 and Vr have the same speed.A primary flight display’s speed scale might not be able to show V1 and Vr at the same point?
-
Post by DickundDoof (
June 7, 2025 at 12:27 PM ).This post was deleted by the author themselves (June 7, 2025 at 1:02 PM ). -
- Official Post
However, he's talking about the "rotate" announcement, like the one Airbus already has here. But your comment is, of course, also correct.
There only are V1 callouts by the system in the real aircraft. The rotate announcement would be made by the pilot non-flying.
-
There only are V1 callouts by the system in the real aircraft. The rotate announcement would be made by the pilot non-flying.
Yes, that's right, my mistake 👍
-
My mistake, always read the exam question!
-
Because we're working on other things...
I thought it won't take much of your time to implement the callout on just this one plane 😆😓
-
The callout is similar to that of 737,, won't take much time just do it😆
-
Because we're working on other things...
Ok Fine but know that flying the 777s without the V1 callout is no fun at all
-
Ok Fine but know that flying the 777s without the V1 callout is no fun at all
Is it difficult to add a V1 callout? I know they have a lot of work and that’s great, but improving existing features is also important I guess
