We all agree, that we want to see a Vatsim-like integrated multiplayer in Aerofly, right?
No actually, it is rash to declare what we all agree on.
Multiplayer and AI ATC?
-
-
I dont want multiplayer i only want the atc.
-
No actually, it is rash to declare what we all agree on.
It’s more like wording than meaning it literally lol
-
I don't need a multiplayer or Vatsim.
Crazy how many people don’t want one of the biggest parts in aviation in aerofly. The three biggest parts are „fly, navigate, communicate“. We already have two of them, so I don’t know why you would not want the third as well. Furthermore, aviation is a passion that connects people so multiplayer would be a great possibility to get a more connected community.
And now let’s come to the economic part: Multiplayer and atc are the top 1 requested features on this forum so this isn’t only my opinion but the opinion of the most. This essentially also leads to me claiming that multiplayer will probably increase the sales by a lot. If it’s only included in a packet it would even generate more money for the devs. And again, money allows them to develop more content.In the end, everybody’s opinion differs, as it shows but am just speaking for the most of us
-
there's one thread every day saying "Can we have multiplayer and AI ATC"
-
there's one thread every day saying "Can we have multiplayer and AI ATC"
Ik and its becoming annoying
-
You can make such requests 10 times a day, and you still won't get it that quickly. We already wait so long for much simpler things. By then, we'll all be long past our prime.
-
Crazy how many people don’t want one of the biggest parts in aviation in aerofly. The three biggest parts are „fly, navigate, communicate“. We already have two of them, so I don’t know why you would not want the third as well. Furthermore, aviation is a passion that connects people so multiplayer would be a great possibility to get a more connected community.
And now let’s come to the economic part: Multiplayer and atc are the top 1 requested features on this forum so this isn’t only my opinion but the opinion of the most. This essentially also leads to me claiming that multiplayer will probably increase the sales by a lot. If it’s only included in a packet it would even generate more money for the devs. And again, money allows them to develop more content.In the end, everybody’s opinion differs, as it shows but am just speaking for the most of us
Aerofly is a FLIGHT-simulator, not a navigation or communication simulator.
-
Aerofly is a FLIGHT-simulator, not a navigation or communication simulator.
YES PLEASE TELL THEM CAUSE I DONT WANT MULTIPLAYER OR ATC FOR IT TO BLOW MY PHONE UP!
-
Aerofly is a FLIGHT-simulator, not a navigation or communication simulator.
Indeed, and communication as well as navigation is part of flying lol
-
Crazy how many people don’t want one of the biggest parts in aviation in aerofly. The three biggest parts are „fly, navigate, communicate“. We already have two of them, so I don’t know why you would not want the third as well. Furthermore, aviation is a passion that connects people so multiplayer would be a great possibility to get a more connected community.
And now let’s come to the economic part: Multiplayer and atc are the top 1 requested features on this forum so this isn’t only my opinion but the opinion of the most. This essentially also leads to me claiming that multiplayer will probably increase the sales by a lot. If it’s only included in a packet it would even generate more money for the devs. And again, money allows them to develop more content.In the end, everybody’s opinion differs, as it shows but am just speaking for the most of us
I have nothing against multiplayer and vatsim. I can also imagine contributing to developments for this.
But I have decided something against it, if here in the forum again and again in support own wishes are claimed that "all" want this or that. And I don't want to be involved in such claims without being asked.
I think very few FS users are here in the forum at all - and not all of them want multiplayer and vatsim.
-
YES PLEASE TELL THEM CAUSE I DONT WANT MULTIPLAYER OR ATF FOR IT TO BLOW MY PHONE UP!
ATF? did you make your flight simulator become a bomb? and the ATF showed up?
-
The airline is currently in prototype mode is what I would like to call it since we don’t have the required features for it yet which is ATC and a possible multiplayer API for aeroflys own flight tracking system but what I would say is that I don’t think we would need it that much but yeah if you want to fly for the airline you can.
Thanks and I'm happy to be on board ( I speak no word of Japanese)
-
ATF? did you make your flight simulator become a bomb? and the ATF showed up?
LOL SORRY MISSPELLING😭
-
Thanks and I'm happy to be on board ( I speak no word of Japanese)
Thats fine
-
Furthermore, aviation is a passion that connects people so multiplayer would be a great possibility to get a more connected community.
Concentrating to achieve top rate simulated flying proficiency should be the very last activity to push for nurturing on-line social interaction. What has it got to do with any excited gossip or agglomerations of mass pan-excitement? what do you want to do? sniff each others exhaust fumes?
Are there not pop stars or (🤮) ‘influencers’ to cater for that sort of distance huggy thing. -
I don't want to "talk" to fictional air traffic controllers who tell me how fast, how high, and where I am allowed fly. In a flight simulator, I fly how I want, not how an AI "air traffic controller" tells me to.
ATCs in other flight sims eg IF or vatsim are real people though…
-
ATCs in other flight sims eg IF or vatsim are real people though…
Expensive and useless
-
Expensive and useless
Indeed, it’s expensive in infinite flight and it also doesn’t really teach you how to communicate in reallife, however why are yall so against a multiplayer combined with atc? Just because infinite flight and Xplane does it that way doesn’t mean that aerofly has to copy them? Aerolfy is way more advanced and I see a great opportunity for them to implement a Vatsim like network. Of course, single player would remain. Nothing speaks against that, really except for the fact that Ipacs should focus on other features first (which I totally agree on)
