I’ve noticed that on the A319 in Aerofly FS, the thrust reverser animation opens much less compared to the real aircraft. In the sim, the reverser cowls barely move, while on the real A319 the reversers open significantly wider, as you can see in the comparison screenshots below.
A319 in the game:
A319 real: 
Would it be possible to improve this in a future update so that the reverser deployment looks more realistic?
Davyy11 The second image is also a flight simulator. Since Aerofly is very realistic, it is most likely correct in Aerofly and incorrect in the other flight simulator.
I think its fine
I think its fine
I think that too.
I think that too.
even if they fixed it i'd bet no one would know until they look at a update log
even if they fixed it i'd bet no one would know until they look at a update log
I understand your point, but I think even small details are important. Aerofly FS is well known for its focus on realism, and things like the thrust reverser animation help to create a more authentic experience.
Of course, the airplane will still fly the same way, but since IPACS often implements even minor improvements for the sake of realism, I think it makes sense to point this out. After all, if realism is one of the main strengths of the sim, then every detail that gets closer to the real aircraft adds to the immersion.
And IPACS has shown that they listen to feedback, even on small things – so I believe it’s worth suggesting.
Davyy11 The second image is also a flight simulator. Since Aerofly is very realistic, it is most likely correct in Aerofly and incorrect in the other flight simulator.
In reality, the reversers open more than they should; it's only a minor issue with IPACS that may be resolved in the future.
I noticed that detail even since the Airbus A321 was launched, the same is true of the Airbus A319 although it should be a little more open or open more, I'm sorry, I don't want to give the boy's comment any negative feedback. I think that for now it wouldn't be important since the plane is in pretty good condition.
I can easily move the rear part of the nacelle for the reverser by a larger amount, the issue is that the 3D model does not support this, there would be a visible gap. So unfortunately this might have to require a re-design of the 3D model with re-texturing of the reverser outflow area, which means all repaints using the IAE engine would need to be updated as well. So unfortunately we cannot easily fix this soon.
