I know Jan already said that there shouldn’t be a huge performance impact because of a new rendering technique they are using, but it would be nice if there was an option to disable the cabin in case the performance impact is too much on desktop.
Development Teasers
-
-
Does the seat belt and the liquid crystal of the no-smoking sign work?
-
We simply don't know yet which devices will be able to load the new A350 cabin. It's not so much an issue of rendering the cabin, it's about the available memory (RAM) which is very limited on some devices.
Will there be a way to disable the cabin on PC? I run a beast PC, yet the A350 still has some slight hiccups in VR at places like Heathrow. For someone who never uses a cabin, it seems like a waste of resources for people like me. Happy that everyone else gets to have wings views though.
-
Can the cabin doors be opened/closed?
Is there a 3D model of the cargo hold?
-
Not too bad…
-
Unless there are passengers inside, the cabin feature seems pointless to me. A different, more useful feature could have been introduced instead. Now a few sycophants are going to target me. If the image of tire smoke or the hot air behind the engine had been added, it could have been something worthwhile. In other words, I think it was a waste of effort.
-
Nobody cares about your feelings.
-
Nobody cares about your feelings.
Already the first sycophant has shown himself. Continue
-
You see, they won't appreciate what you've done; they'll only care about whether they got what they wanted.
-
You see, they won't appreciate what you've done; they'll only care about whether they got what they wanted.
Appreciation is one thing. Of course, I respect their efforts. What I'm talking about is priorities.
-
Appreciation is one thing. Of course, I respect their efforts. What I'm talking about is priorities.
I don’t see any respect in your words at all. Let me give you an example: I personally don’t like multiplayer games, but I know some people do. If IPACS Studio actually added multiplayer to Aerofly, I wouldn’t criticize it at all—I’d try to enjoy it. That’s the change in my attitude toward the game.Try to enjoy everything.
-
Unless there are passengers inside, the cabin feature seems pointless to me. A different, more useful feature could have been introduced instead. Now a few sycophants are going to target me. If the image of tire smoke or the hot air behind the engine had been added, it could have been something worthwhile. In other words, I think it was a waste of effort.
What you want is not what everyone wants. Create a new thread and speak for yourself. Be smart, speaking against a feature that you don't like is what a dummy would do
-
What you want is not what everyone wants. Create a new thread and speak for yourself. Be smart, speaking against a feature that you don't like is what a dummy would do
I’m simply expressing my opinion about the update, nothing more.
It’s completely normal that different players prioritize different features.
You may disagree with me, and that’s fine — but disagreement doesn’t require personal remarks.
I respect the developers’ work, and I also respect that others may enjoy this feature.
All I’m saying is that, in my view, other improvements would have contributed more to realism.
Let’s keep the discussion about the game itself rather than turning it into something personal.
-
I don’t see any respect in your words at all. Let me give you an example: I personally don’t like multiplayer games, but I know some people do. If IPACS Studio actually added multiplayer to Aerofly, I wouldn’t criticize it at all—I’d try to enjoy it. That’s the change in my attitude toward the game.Try to enjoy everything.
Even if multiplayer is released, anyone who wants to can still fly in single-player mode. No one would force them to fly in multiplayer anyway.
-
Even if multiplayer is released, anyone who wants to can still fly in single-player mode. No one would force them to fly in multiplayer anyway.
But at the very least, I wouldn’t say that developing a multiplayer mode is a waste of effort. I absolutely wouldn’t think that way.
-
Unless there are passengers inside, the cabin feature seems pointless to me. A different, more useful feature could have been introduced instead. Now a few sycophants are going to target me. If the image of tire smoke or the hot air behind the engine had been added, it could have been something worthwhile. In other words, I think it was a waste of effort.
They could have channeled all this energy to like touchdown sounds and smoke or so, but the interior view is nice tho but it not necessary
-
This looks awsome.
Is this your own design or is this inspired by a real interior?
The business class seats are from Cathay Pacific and the economy seats are a popular design found on airlines like British Airways
-
We simply don't know yet which devices will be able to load the new A350 cabin. It's not so much an issue of rendering the cabin, it's about the available memory (RAM) which is very limited on some devices.
we get an a350 cabin. one question. what about the cabin lighting.
