A20N Feedback and Improvements

  • The cockpit windows have this strange grey reflection that looks completely unrealistic, and it really breaks the immersion. It doesn’t even look like a proper NEO. Hopefully this bug will be fixed.

    Regarding the PTU sounds, it was mentioned that they were updated and should be more realistic, but when playing, it’s exactly the same sound as on the other A320 versions. Apart from the engine sound, which also isn’t very accurate, there’s this continuous “whistling-like” noise when the engines are at idle which is not realistic at all.

    Regarding the whale sound, yes, the actual sound sample is realistic, but there’s an issue with it. It starts sounding every single time when the engines reach those parameters (e.g. 300–400), no matter if the thrust is increasing or decreasing the power, if the thrust is in those parameters during descent you can hear it the whole time. In reality, this sound is only occur when the thrust is increasing. I hope this makes sense. These small details are what really make the difference.


    As for the lights, the issue is already known and hopefully will be fixed soon, and I would also be happy to see that finally in the a320 the beacon light is flashing the top part of the wing and winglet as well like in real life. What’s also missing are the fuel pumps which I like to call the “signature sound of an a320” and the electric pump is not realistic at all, it doesn’t match real-life sound in any way.


    I really hope the A20N gets proper improvements, with accurate sounds, lights, and detailed systems. It would be a shame to add a new aircraft just for the sake of “adding it”, because right now that’s exactly how it feels, like something rushed just to be included. Don’t take it as a complain, it’s just a friendly feedback.

    Thanks for reading. 🙂

  • Go fly the neo in RFS.. maybe that will satisfy you. Some of us are just impossible to please. 😒


    Okay, my intention was not to create any controversy or to point fingers at the development team. I didn’t say anywhere that I don’t appreciate or that I’m not satisfied with the new aircraft that was added. We all have the right to our own personal opinion and to leave feedback, especially as paying customers. No one received this product for free.
    My point was that I would like to see this aircraft with more details because I know what IPACS is capable of. The A350 is proof of that. It’s an excellent and fully detailed aircraft. And since I know they are capable of achieving that level of quality, of course I’m leaving my opinion and feedback here, because I believe it’s for their own benefit. This way, they’ll attract many more players and the game can become one of the most popular on mobile.

    I’m sorry if you felt attacked, or if anyone felt attacked, that was not my intention. 🙂 And regarding RFS, let’s not bring other games into this forum. I would kindly ask you to refrain from suggesting what I should play or where I should go. I did not ask for that in this thread. 🙂 Thank you.

  • you guys are such susceptible to the slightest feedback that's awful. please read carefully OP's post: it's a feedback, not a judgement! He, as myself and probably you all, is a paying customer and just spotted some issues in the product. I didn't see anyone being rude in this thread, so please stop bringing annoying comments for nothing

    Aviationly,

    SkyX

  • Guys you can’t have everything. The developers have to make everything in limits for it to work on phone’s, low end and high end and they’re doing a great job. If you compare any simulator on the app store or play store Aerofly is basically the best. You can’t throw a dice and expect it to land on six every time. In time they will optimize everything just have patience and enjoy the simulator. If you’re not satisfied and keep complaining I would recommend you to switch to something that fits you better🙂

    I wasn’t demanding to be done now or in the next day. No one was rushing anyone to do something, like a few users that was in the same idea with me, it’s just a feedback for improvements. In my post there’s three times mentioned “Hopefully this will be fixed soon” which doesn’t sound like a demand to me. My post reason was to show IPACS what can be done, if they want to take it into consideration that’s perfect, if not, same thing it’s completely fine. No one is telling anyone what to do, and making a whole argument and disagreements was the last thing I wanted to happen. 😆 I bet even IPACS laughs at us. 😆

  • admin December 12, 2025 at 8:58 AM

    Closed the thread.