Since flight operations have started today at Terminal 3 in Frankfurt, I would like to see an update for this airport. Perhaps the developers could consider it. Thank you.
Terminal 3 EDDF
-
Yes please.
-
Since flight operations have started today at Terminal 3 in Frankfurt, I would like to see an update for this airport. Perhaps the developers could consider it. Thank you.
frankfurt is something else i always have to switch off vulkan to go there or even some parts of Germany maybe map detail is too much idk it just crashes most time.
-
Post by SilentObserver (
April 24, 2026 at 6:38 PM ).This post was deleted by the author themselves (April 24, 2026 at 6:39 PM ). -
frankfurt is something else i always have to switch off vulkan to go there or even some parts of Germany maybe map detail is too much idk it just crashes most time.
Works perfectly for me. Android, 100%, Ultra, airplane lights ON.
-
In my phone, Vulkan can get me 30-60fps but the moment i look at even a small airport i get HORRENDOUS lag spikes. Maybe optimization.
-
Works perfectly for me. Android, 100%, Ultra, airplane lights ON.
with vulkan in frankfurt in the A350? how many fps?
-
with vulkan in frankfurt in the A350? how many fps?
At most 21 FPS. Sometimes only 15 FPS. The A350 isn't very good at night. It's much better during the day. A known problem.
-
Post by Tomfa (
April 24, 2026 at 11:14 PM ).This post was deleted by the author themselves (April 24, 2026 at 11:23 PM ). -
At most 21 FPS. Sometimes only 15 FPS. The A350 isn't very good at night. It's much better during the day. A known problem.
that isn't perfect now is it? even at day you won't get much that isn't solely a A350 problem if you go to sydney you'll find 60fps stable with the same A350. so it's the region too. i have tested everything. try A32N the performance will be better than 350 but still worse than if you fly other regions.
-
that isn't perfect now is it? even at day you won't get much that isn't solely a A350 problem if you go to sydney you'll find 60fps stable with the same A350. so it's the region too. i have tested everything. try A32N the performance will be better than 350 but still worse than if you fly other regions.
Yes, I've also noticed the difference between the various regions. But for me, the only problems at night are with the A350; all other aircraft are OK. The mentioned FPS refers only to the cockpit view. However, 30 FPS is sufficient, as far as I know. I don't remember who wrote that.
-
Yes, I've also noticed the difference between the various regions. But for me, the only problems at night are with the A350; all other aircraft are OK.
yeah and I know the problem it's either the city lights or the satellite image cause if you look at at night you'll get higher fps but when there is city lights it drops crazy.
-
more city lights = more lag
speaking about other aircraft most glass cockpit aircraft's with touchscreen will be the same except the 737/GA aircraft even if you try the 787/A350 you'll face the same problem.
You can test them if you like I've already tested everything & it's common for most android users. btw what are your specs? is it snapdragon?
-
more city lights = more lag
speaking about other aircraft most glass cockpit aircraft's with touchscreen will be the same except the 737/GA aircraft even if you try the 787/A350 you'll face the same problem.
You can test them if you like I've already tested everything & it's common for most android users. btw what are your specs? is it snapdragon?
Nubia Pad Pro Snapdragon 8/3 12GB RAM expandable to 24GB. This tablet has been my best investment for Android (€380).
-
Nubia Pad Pro Snapdragon 8/3 12GB RAM expandable to 24GB. This tablet has been my best investment for Android (€380).
similar specs i also have a 8 gen 3 phone w me
-
The performance difference has little to do with city lights. City lights use static lighting and have very low rendering requirements. If you turn off all the external lights on the aircraft, you will find that the frame rate magically improves a bit. It’s hard to imagine that the frame rate difference between Vulkan 1.3 and 1.1 is not that big
-
The performance difference has little to do with city lights. City lights use static lighting and have very low rendering requirements. If you turn off all the external lights on the aircraft, you will find that the frame rate magically improves a bit. It’s hard to imagine that the frame rate difference between Vulkan 1.3 and 1.1 is not that big
You can see the difference city lights make I've tested this extensively and found the same results multiple times this is with OGL kept the game paused you can see its the same position. with aircraft lights on looking away from the city lights increase frame rate by a lot. another example is looking at less populated lights. 37FPS less populated lights,29FPS on dense lights,59 looking at the sky.
-
You ignored the buildings. You're flying so low that building rendering consumes a large amount of FPS
-
-
