In Aerofly FS we have tmd files and at the very top of the file the camera positions are defined.
But I still don't understand which camera is missing in the B777??
In Aerofly FS we have tmd files and at the very top of the file the camera positions are defined.
But I still don't understand which camera is missing in the B777??
Hi Matt,
We're investigating if we can create a repaint kit for the A320. The textures are not as well organized, e.g. the fuselage is cut into several pieces on the texture so that it's not easy to write text on the fuselage. I think we had an Aer Lingus livery at some point during the development but I'm not sure if that is still up to date and could be published or not. We're evaluating this as well.
The B777 has three wing views, which one would you like to see? Left/right? In the front looking at the engine or from the rear looking forward at the wing?
The view that you've shown us in the B747 is only possible in the B747 because it has an upper deck. The B777 doesn't have that and therefor a view from that high up would be pretty unrealistic.
Yes exactly...also the 777 does this weird thing where in when you push the slider back from the brakes to provide thrust it automatically retracts the speedbrakes...
Well yes but the real aircraft does that too. How much did you move the slider up and how fast were you traveling and are you on the ground?
The C90GTx, Q400 and LJ45 all have an autopilot that can capture and fly a VOR radial
The participants were those that were already familiar with navigraph and certainly already in the community to have heard about this survey. They don't represent the entire market they represent part of the existing customer group. The results for "how long have you been playing flight simulators" shows how few new people participated.
So there are probably a lot more people that fall into the category "have nothing to do with aviation" and "are not yet visiting a flight school in real life" than the represented figure of 80% or so of those that participated.
Since the survey had such a select group of people participating the number of users is not really representative for the entire user base.
More interesting are the results for how much money users are investing per year, how much time they have and what aircraft they choose to fly because of that. I would have liked to see a map where users actually fly on the virtual globe, what their destinations are.
The reversers are deployed only when you pull the slider down and when you are above 70kts on the ground.
You can click the yellow airplane symbol in the location menu on the airport diagram to teleport into the final approach, ready for landing. If you set up a route to land on that same runway you'll also get autotuning in most airliners.
The reversers are only used to about 70kts. Below that speed it would not be safe to operate them and therefore they are not used when you pull the throttle slider back into the brake area.
It's currently not possible to load two aircraft. You can only create a basic ui in game when it's part of the aircraft. But the UI would be part of the virtual cockpit and not an actual interface.
What do you want to with the interface
I think this area counts as overrun area which at the end of the runway would be yellow arrows up until the threshold.
But it's probably a question for the aviation stack exchange
The HUD in the a380 hasn't been programmed yet.
unusual power consumption by the app on iPad Pro , hope developer will fix it
Did you change the graphics frame rate by any chance? If you set the frame rate to limited it should draw a bit less power.
Looks like vulkan crashed. Does it also crash if you fly with default scenery only?
Great aircraft and I would love to fly it in Aerofly FS but two of our competitors also have this or a similar TBM in their sim I think. The 1000+ man hours for such a project are probably better invested on a different aircraft. We're not ruling it out though, if we see that this creates a popular demand then we'll be happy to add this cool single engine turboprop which is in a class of it's own.
Eventually probably yes but I have no idea when or in which time frame.