That is z-fighting of the taxiway lines. When you fly closer to the ground it should disappear at some point.
Which side of the airport is this or does this happen on all taxiways in Denver?
Does this only happen in Denver or also at other airports?
What device are you using?
What is the tm.log error?
We're still experiencing issues with the store and this not really in our hands at this time. Sorry.
But we'll keep trying.
Imagine if Aerofly had a advanced interactive cockpit so you could turn off the plane after flight.
Well you already can for some aircraft. And we're working on improving that number 
You can edit all tmd files... Why do you want hem brighter?
It took a year because you are a small dev team. Don't take me wrong. I love Aerofly. It got me in to flight sim and it keeps me there because of vr. I just worry about the future cause things are slow and there are some big players at the horizon with VR promises coming up. You are a small dev team and you have your pace and I've bought everything from all third party devs and the community must be one of the best out there. But I still worry. Ipacs will survive but only because of mobile... Hope I'm wrong❤️
A lot of the time for the development was spent on evaluating different approaches and parameters with real world pilots and real world flight data. It's not easy to obtain real world flight data and was quite time consuming. I don't think a bigger company would be faster here unless they really throw a lot of money at it and buy new equipment for horrendous amounts of money to be able to do flight tests in parallel. But they still would have to wait for the right weather conditions and would for the pilots to have enough time (or spend even more money). One could also cut corners in the product quality to speed things up but this is clearly not what we are doing. We put quality first and we try to do all things for the long run.
E.g. our graphics engine is running so quickly because throughout the entire development process quality was prioritized. And with that I mean code that is well thought out for the long run, scale-able, efficient and using modern techniques. You can't just blow up an old graphics engine and then try to optimize it and expect to get the same results.
To draw a parallel to airplanes:
One tactic would be to build a brand new aircraft using only the latest materials, latest engines and airfoils. This allows you to do everything right this time. Already drill in holes where you need to add something later, even though it takes time to prepare for the future. This obviously is not cheap and takes a lot of time for development.
The other option would be to keep the old design and put new engines under it. This second method involves moving the engines forward and up because they don't fit under the wings because the landing gear was not designed with bigger engines in mind. But moving the engines and the huge cowlings has unwanted side effects when s*** get's real and it get's harder to recover from a stall. You could then add a new feature to try and patch that problem which may lead to unwanted side effects or even crashes because you may not have enough time left before the "release". Then you need to add another bug fix to fix the first bug fix. But you can't redesign too much or else you lose "backwards compatibility" and the pilots will need new training. Of course you too have to make the cockpit new and shiny and add all the latest features. It has to look like a major step forward and state of the art.
And it probably is alright and safe to fly this re-engined aircraft once the initial issues have been sorted out. I'd be happy to fly it for the first time. But in the end the new design is much more efficient and uses way less fuel, has better handling qualities and is probably more user friendly in many ways. From the clean cockpit interfaces to the wider passenger seats to the easier maintenance at much longer intervals.
(Sorry for the long post. )
it still to this day amazes me that a flight sim was released without a rotary aircraft. And now, this far down the line, we have only one.
I wonder how much longer we have to wait this year?
You do realize that the development of the R22 took almost a year? That's why we didn't delay the release for the entire flight sim and the other 20+? aircraft that it comes with. Outstanding helicopter flight physics are not implemented just like that.
There is no available setting for it.
It's not our first choice. We're limited to roughly 4GB app sizes by apple from what I have learned.
Welcome to the community
Some of our basic tutorials can be found on our website:
https://www.aerofly.com/tutorials/
E.g. check out the flight planning and instrument navigation
And the more in-depth step-by-step flight tutorials are over in our wiki:
A320 (also for beginners): https://www.aerofly.com/dokuwiki/doku.…aft:airbus_a320
Learjet 45: https://www.aerofly.com/dokuwiki/doku.…raft:learjet_45
We're expanding these over time and please ask questions, we're all here for you.
Can I ask a related question - does the ADF receiver in the Cessna work for navigating with DNBs?
For *NDBs... yes.
What device are you using?
When you lower your graphics quality settings is it possible to avoid the crash?
Things that should be fixed in the next updateDisplay More
1 plane should correct the reflection of the glass And silver in the engine section and a cockpit windows like pc version
1.1 b777 should fix the main gear Lower And the work of the main gear to be like the b777 in real, because now the expression is the same as the a330 and we only have cargo door on the right side of an airplane
1.2 a380 Solving the Hydraulic Behavior at the nose gear it should be longer And the curvature of the airplane wing
1.3 b747 Modified the look of the plane to look more realistic specially the face of the plane
1.4 b737 should fix the part of an airplane when it’s landing when the gears touching runway also a320 b777 Lear jet q400
1.5 q400 fix air break when the plane touching runway
2 Ground:
add a parking plane at the airport as the same you guys ever did it once so take it back again a lot of airplanes in airports makes it feel so alive and add more a new vision and more!!
thank you so much this is very important to make the games looks more realistic I know you can do! Please please
sorry for my English!!!
1 This is a limitation of the shaders on mobile but we can try and create a work around
1.1 Known issue we'll fix that
1.2 Please elaborate. The steering works great and the nose gear damper also works well. Not sure that should be solved here since it works as it should. What do you mean with wing curvature? Wing flex?
1.3 The B747 is based on many photos can you show us exactly what you mean? It looks very realistic to me.
1.4 What part?
1.5 The Q400 spoilers work realistically. They extend when you move the power levers into the beta range. They don't extend on their own after touch down as in real life. What exactly do you think needs fixing here?
2. Which airport is missing a parking position? What kind of new views would you like to have?
To recalibrate you can just press the back button and then resume the flight.
Or quickly flip your device upside down
But yeah, whenever the autopilot disengages or the copilot is turned off it would be good to recalibrate.
He was talking mainly about the reverser bug, which we can fix as soon as work resumes after the Christmas break.
Push back is a whole other topic.
Hi Lucas,
Yes you can do that and I think there already exists such a download on flight-sim.org
You can do all that with the tmd, yes. You can use the sound single for this or add a new event_edge to trigger a sound_event that plays your touch down sound. I wouldn't use the vertical speed since that instrument has a delay to it and doesn't represent the actual touch down rate. But you can get the compression of the main gear from the joints' ".Output" and then either trigger a sound when the deflection gets really large (larger than when you are on the ground stationary) or use a differentiator from that joint output to get the speed at which the gear is compressed (in m/s). You can then use that speed to change your gear sounds.
You also have the wheel .Load, .Skid and .Speed outputs that you can use. You could also differentiate the .Speed to get the acceleration of the wheels or differentiate the .Load to get a value for how quickly the load increases on the main tires.
There are loads and loads of physical values that you can use...
Just make sure to send them to the sound section via "output" object and receive them via "soundinput". Then you can mix them all together as you see fit.
I literally cannot fly that plane because of that problem. It's a gorgeous model but the total lack of any RPM/pitch change when you move the throttles or prop levers is just a killer.
Have you contacted the Just-Flight support on this matter?
Hi Kenneth,
Yes you can edit the tmd files to create pretty much any sound you want. You just have to create a mapping for each sound that is used to change its pitch and volume depending on the right factors.
E.g. you can use the rotation speed of the engine to change the pitch of sound to make the sound feel faster or slower.
Make a backup of your tmd files before you start!
- Jan
