Please forgive me for what must be a newb question, but I can't get any of the user created cultivation to show up. Third party software like Orbx or Aerosoft shows the cultivation in those packages, but user created cultivation such as Rodeo's Venice or my own is not appearing. I put it in the Documents/Aerofly FS 2/addons/scenery/ directory as directed, but no joy.
What stupid thing am I doing or not going?
Bill
They will have my money as soon as it is released.
Some form of realistic looking weather has been my number one request since day one. It doesn't have to change, it doesn't have to reflect the current real world, just multiple cloud layers that reach the horizon and wind that varies by altitude would make a huge difference for me.
No I have not. I will give Chicago a try.
I have been playing around with the Oculus S and Aerofly. There is really no need to upgrade to the S if you have the original Oculus. I also feel like the lack of base stations makes the S slightly less "stable", although only slightly.
I'm sure I will get an Index sooner rather than later. I am an evangelist for VR 
Maybe you had a user folder link defined via
<[string8][extra_user_folder][H:\ipacs]>
(that's mine) in main.mcf and this entry got lost either when you deleted the file youself or it was replaced by an update?
Kind regards, Michael
Yes, that is probably it. I will have a look!
Actually, my cultivation is inside airport files. The map.toc file is in the folder, and is referenced at the end of the .tsc document.
Is that not how it should work these days? The airports themselves show up just fine.
After returning from my six month break, all of my home-made cultivation seems to be missing. Is there some change that has to be made in the location of the files? I hope it is something simple!
Bill
It already was set for motion smoothing, so that won't help.
Oldar, have you considered trying motion smoothing? It sets everything to 45 fps but sends in a filler image and imitates 90 fps thus allowing you to turn a few settings up higher. I find it great for flight sims.
Is that setting found in the ViveVR menu or is it part of Aerofly FS2?
Does it maintain a truly smooth frame rate even in dense areas at 120 fps? I have a Vive Pro, and even with a 2080 TI and an 8700K at 4.7 I have to turn down the over sampling to 1.0 to maintain 90 fps.
The landing lights do not and have never illuminated the ground. They are well aware of the problem and will no doubt enable that feature some day.
Oh c'mon, I can give you link of the video ( A320 EGPWS TCAS and warns) .
Just copy the sounds ..
They are absolute sticklers on copyright issues.
Where is Jeff? Have the moderators mellowed? 
Everyone who has been on this site for a long time is familiar with my Cassandra-like laments that sooner or later FS2 will get over-taken by one of the big-boys, and all of their fabulous work will have been for naught. It is something that makes me genuinely sad. But Ipacs can only move at their own pace, and complaining gets us nowhere. Of course we still have to make our voices heard. Just don't expect it to make any difference in the end.
I can't believe they haven't erased this thread. They certainly would have six months ago.
Many of us have been waiting for and asking for these things for well over two years now. You can really only enjoy the program if you stop waiting for the stuff you want. Otherwise you will drive yourself nuts.
Oh yes, I remember that every update would disable the D400 and the cold & dark Cessna mod!
Thank you delfinpm! That site is indeed very interesting!
Looks like I picked the right week to come back!
Floating houses (Warning: Pet peeve) in mountainous terrain in sims is pretty much the most common thing ever. Years ago I proposed making all houses have "sub basements", which meant essentially containing structure that went down maybe about three floors below ground level so that when a house found itself on a steep slope, it would not end up hanging in the air, defying gravity.
Microsoft Flight apparently had the same idea, and is the only sim I know that ran with the concept, ending the issue of dangling houses. I proposed it here again a long time ago as Aerofly was a new sim at the time and it seemed a good idea to implement such a concept at the very beginning, but again the idea was lost (sigh)
Maybe the concept will have its day, on some sim or the other.
[Blocked Image: http://imagizer.imageshack.com/img924/3373/8IS8Rj.jpg]
I reported that problem years ago too. I guess it must be harder to fix than it seems.
I see that this is still a place where we disagree over stuff! Thanks again for the input.
I just got the latest version of the corded Oculus, so today I will make sure that I have the beta version of Aerofly on Steam and see how well everything is doing in VR. I always was of the opinion that it was the VR experience that made FS2 most worthwhile.
