Ok aber sie haben gesagt wenn jemand fragt wird der a350 verschoben das finde ich traurig es Fragen viele Leute weil sie den a350 in aerofly haben wollen dan hätten sie das Thema a350 gar nicht ansprechen sollten
Es wurde gesagt, dass dann die Teaser verschoben werden. Vom a350 selbst war nicht die Rede.
Do I understand correctly that it is about leaving the runway at a certain taxi way exit? Then the airports also have to adapt? Or am I misunderstanding this?
Correct. But airports don’t need to adapt in order for it to work.
It’s based on gps data.
It’s almost been a year now and it still hasn’t been fixed. Can we expect a fix soon?
We've published a small patch to fix the crashes when switching camera views when pushback is active.
Please report back if the issues are now fully resolved on your end. If not please explain in full detail which camera view assignments you used (i.e. the name of the function as assigned in the controls menu).
The fix has resolved it for me. Thanks
I finally have the time to respond.
I am using a Macbook Air M1 with 16 gb of ram.
Is strange how this thread is mark as resolve , when no one from Ipacs was bothering to give an answer
I don’t know how that happened 
Thanks for pointing it out, I‘ve now changed it back to unresolved.
I was disappointed by the update. What was changed?
There are still many problems (bugs)
On a single landing,, I noticed these problems:
-Full and uncontrolled pitch down movement on tilt devices when calibrated- ANNOYING
External Content www.youtube.comContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.
From the video you sent, it looks like you mean the pitch down input shortly before touchdown. This is actually normal behavior for the a320.
The a320 has a flare mode, which commands a nose down in, and as a pilot you would have to counteract, by commanding a slight pitch up command.
I would recommend to disengage the autopilot a little earlier so you would not be taken off guard by that system and this would also help you get a better feeling for the plane before you’re entering ground effect.
Whats also interesting is that the option.tmc file of the British Airways livery has "engine_iae" written in it. When using it in the sim, the spinning animation of engine number 1 is weird.
When removing it, everything is normal.
Could someone try to see if it's a general issue?
How about the sound?
(by the way, you kinda found an Easter egg. Congrats)
I didn't notice any difference in sound. Looks like it's still early development.
So the new engine exists or not? It would be incredible to have two engine options on each plane like in real life, the a320 has CFM56 and the IAE V2500 to have them on Airbus would be a dream
Not yet. But it looks like IPACS intents to add it in the future.
Display MoreI'm not in front of my computer (macOS).
What I would immediately try:
I'd make a copy of the engine_iae. I'd rename the copy as engine_cfm.
And I would copy the folder in ~/Appplication Support/Aerofly FS 4/Aircarfts/a320/engine_cfm
The files stored here take over the original ones in the installation folder (it's non destructive).
And I would try the A320 and listen to the sound.
If Aerofly crashes after that, you just have to delete the added folder engine_cfm
All the manipulations have to be done Aerofly application closed.
Results:
The gauges in the cockpit are also the ones from the CFM and not the IAE engines.
There are already new engines in Aerofly. Is it for the a320?
Yes, it's for the a320. Looks like the files have been added with the last update of Aerofly FS 4. They are still not usable but probably ready to be activated. Hopefully with the next big update.
Okay, now I'm excited.
I have noticed that the Lufthansa livery on the b747 has been replaced by the new one with the latest update. Is there a way to get the old one back? I have already tried going into the stable channel and copying the livery and pasting it into the normal version, but it only shows the KLM livery.
Since the latest update many airports don't have working taxiway lights anymore. (e.g. Frankfurt, London, Hamburg,...)
Furthermore all of the latest airports both generic and custom airports have no working runway and PAPI lights. ( e.g. Dubai, Tokyo, Sydney, Hong Kong)
Frankfurt:
Tokyo Haneda:
With the update today these problems have been fixed. Thanks.
Unfortunately though, the CRJ now has the same problems that the b777 and b787 had.
This bug report was probably forgotten as it was just before New Years Eve last year.
This is just a reminder, because it's still not fixed.
I have also noticed that the the flaps have changed. Was this done on purpose?
normal version:
:
beta version:
Your sceneries are incredible! I don’t know if you have a list of airports to do or if you take airport requests, but can you (or anyone who has experience in making sceneries for FS4) give the African continent a bit of love ?
GMTT Tangier airport in Morocco would be great as there is already good photoscenery for Morocco. https://flight-sim.org/filebase/index…-af-ma-morocco/
And it’s close to Europe which is almost completely covered by IPACS.
On the b777 and the b787 when only using reverse thrust on the right engine, you can see that the reverser doors are open but the engine still pulls the plane forward.
On the CRJ-900 only using reverse thrust on the left engine results in reverse thrust output in both engines even though the reverser doors on the right engine are not open. On the other hand using full reverse thrust on the right engine only results in idle reverse for that engine.
