The entire UK has been available for quite a while on flight-sim.org Check out the files from IZOJUB over there.
Thanks for the info, I know that one, it’s a great work. But I’d still expect UK scenery with customized 3D buildings and high-quality airports modeling.
We have been coveting the UK scenery for PC for months. 
Can we expect to see it by this summer? 
It is by far not a 60$ product anymore when you have bought almost every dlc that was available as I did. I started 4 years ago with Aerofly FS which brought me back to flight simulation after a longer pause and because of VR. I expected more evolvement in 4 years to be honest.
I started using Aerofly PC in 2017 and had bought nearly all the addons but to be honest I would appreciate a little bit more progress in four years as well.
Display MoreDas kann doch nicht Ihr ernst sein,haben Sie das DLC mal genauer angeschaut (VFR AIRPORT PACK über Steam)??
Solche DLC hatte ich nicht einmal bei Microsoft 2004,und da waren es Standard Flughäfen.
Sie haben eine Falsche einstellung,was nützen Ihnen schlechte DLC..wenn es keinen gefällt, da gehen die Leute dahin wo es besser ist.
Das nützt hier keinen!!!!
Tut mir leid,aber mit sowas kann man keine Leute überzeugen zu wechseln.
I checked it. LFPG now has ground texture and looks much better than before. There’s issue regarding mesh but I’m sure it’s not a big problem and they can fix it soon. I can’t see why you’re so disgruntled about this update.
Wer um himmels willen,erstellt solche schlechten DLC (auch wenn es kostenlos ist)?????????????????
Wenn das die DLC sind (wie Just Flight Hawk) und jetzt das für Aerofly FS 2 im Jahr 2021..werde ich mich bald von hier zurück ziehen.
Und wieder dahin gehen wo meine Wurzeln sind, und ich 98 das erste mal mit Flugsimulation angefangen habe.
Tut mir Leid.
I don’t understand why you have such comment. The cityscape in this DLC is great. Airports were bad but here they are making up for them. The price is reasonable. I don’t think there’s anything to complain. Furthermore, we should be thankful that there’re still developers paying attention to Aerofly. Please don’t start this year in this forum with passive attitude.
Is this problem gonna to be repaired when UK comes to PC? orbx uses aerial images as well and they don’t have problem like this. Happy to pay extra money because this really influence experience.
But this is very difficult as we need a partner in China that handles all this for us. It is something the chinese government has introduced recently, it affects all apps and we are afraid a lot of apps will be missing in the store real soon.
This is sickness. The government is collaborating with those big companies such as Tencent and Netease. On the one hand they do what they called “Entertainment product import regulation” to control what its citizens can see and read. One the other hand they use this to bring trouble to foreign developers to force them to cooperate with those domestic companies and share profits. The Chinese AppStore is literally a junkyard now and is occupied by those agent products, harming consumers and developers, benefiting the government and big companies.
But what’s really unexpected is they are even extending their claws to flight simulators. I mean, what can a flight simulator does harm to the governmental propaganda? The Microsoft flight simulator is banned in China because they use bing map??? What the f**k??? Anyway, I’m sorry this complexed political factor brings trouble to your business. Tens of thousands of Chinese players would really love to see FS2021 on Chinese AppStore and I wish you good luck. BUT DO NOT SUCCUMB TO THOSE AGENT COMPANIES!!! As Aerofly is the last few clean water in the dirty AppStore mainstream.
This is amazing, great job! So various are those planes, there is even an Lufthansa A350. Hopefully one day IPACS can finish their ATC to work with these aircrafts.
Hi, can we still expect to see an upgrade to the Boston DLC? The Logan airport is still cursory, many tall buildings in downtown still have bad textures.
I hope IPACS can release PNW this Christmas
They just finished a big update, give them a break.
Flying without landing lights is perfectly possible, it is part of real world training. Do you think a landing light bulb failing is a deadly fault?
Then let’s rename Aerofly FS to “Broken light emergency training FS”.
1.It is called flight simulator, not aircraft failure simulator
2.A320 is now providing GPWS, and it’s better than any default models in XP11, P3D etc.
3.Many of the aircrafts provide option to start cold and dark and engine can certainty be turned off.
4.I’m sure you know very little about what aerodynamics mean. Whatever you preferred as a real “flight simulator” doesn’t provide aerodynamics better than Aerofly in a perceivable scale by non-professional users.
5.Don’t blame your hard landing to the sim, blame your maneuvering. In fact the high frame rate in Aerofly gives you better control of the aircraft when it comes to subtle control. You certainly can’t perform a beautiful landing in a 20fps- orbx TE KSEA in XP11.
It’s solved, thanks.
Hi,
This has been a problem for quite some time (so it has nothing to do with the alpha update).
I thought it will vanish with the next update, but it doesn’t. Any idea how to solve this issue?
What I have watched happen is that new users come on board and are ecstatic (like me in January 2017). Over time these users become frustrated with the lack of progress and drift away, to be replaced by a new group who are in turn ecstatic, who then repeat the process. This has happened several times.
And time after time there are always “users” trying to defend IPACS and criticize those who show their concerns, their worries, and misinterpret it as “a way to ask for what themselves demand”.
Perhaps they are agents sent by Laminar Research or Lockheed to blind our developers and control the forum, so as to prevent Aerofly from true progress.
Almost every time I start up Aerofly FS2 - I choose Steam "Offline Mode". What does it mean in this context?
As long as Aerofly FS2 does not have Multiplayer - "players online" is not very relevant. What matters - is whether IPACS is comfortable with the financial statements (income vs. expenses). My impression from the outside is that they have good control. And I support quality over quantity - even though I know that quality is time consuming.
Steam has default settings of starting in online mode, most people won’t intentionally start offline. Even if many players launch Aerofly in offline mode, let’s thus multiply the number by 3, it still has only two digits. While the online player number for FSX and XP11 is usually between 1000-2000, I believe there’ll be quite a number of going offline so the number can be even larger, according to your theory, which still far outnumber ours.
There might be quite some number of mobile players, which on the other hand makes IPACS “comfortable with their financial statement”, I guess. But don’t you afraid the PC version of Aerofly eventually turn into an HD mobile version? (That’s also what I hear from many simmers why they refuse to try Aerofly). And that’s what seems to be happening. I’m afraid this will lead PC version into a dead end because one day when the VR and frame rate advantages are caught up by other sims, what can drive IPACS to keep paying attention to PC considering their mobile version is so profitable while PC version has so few users?
If you think that FSX / FSX-SE, P3D, X-Plane, etc. are better for you - then switch over.
While we all want to see more users to switch to Aerofly, you tell the (already small) player group to switch over? Aerofly doesn’t have the privilege to be so arrogant as the player number is already pity. Each time I get access to steamdb, I’ll get shocked and frustrated because Aerofly is always the game with least players online on the list. Usually no more than 50 globally. GLOBALLY!!!
Don’t reduce the circle any further, please. I would miss IPACS’s steak one day and by that day there may be no chance anymore.
Is the “when possible” only applied to Aerofly or all three platforms? (My question also got deleted with Jetjockey10’s thread). The slight difference can be informative.
Do not be like rats lining up for a run at the hawse hole, but be supportive and encourage one another here. This is a good sim with a good group of developers and users. My thanks to all.
We are constantly supporting Aerofly and the group, we defend Aerofly from insults from players of other sims and try to propagandize it to bring our sim more user, we buy nearly all addons even if some of them might actually not interest us to support the developers. However, blindly comforting the developers and suppressing different voice as you did is not favored, from my point of view.
The team is small, I agree
The works are hard, I agree
There’re some intrinsic coding problems that cause some features hard to implement, I agree
......
But so many years of no big features such as weather, ATC? Two years since they release any new scenery? The update now seems to become only once a year? And you now tell the users to shut up and keep the developers in some comfortable zone? I can sincerely tell you that being noisy is being supportive, because we are still interested, and we worry. You might be happy when one day this forum is silent, don’t you? And I favor the users to bring some stress to the devs, it’s a critical time in FS history, you being sluggish, you will be out of the game. No matter how many excuses you have.
And I really hope IPACS can slap in my face and show me how naive and stupid those words are one day using their new product, maybe a brand new, powerful and beautiful Aerofly FS 3
.
