Dear Ipacs,
Will an AFS4 application ever see the light of day at Nvidia?
As many games are already registered with Nvidia, including MSFS, it would be good and certainly more practical for most of us who have an Nvidia card if this application could be added to Nvidia Experience, this would avoid many settings problems or other performance, whether for PC or Notebook.
What do you think about IPACS?
Thanks Michael for the screen, I should have thought of that. 
Now let's see what's new? 
Great job Michael Thank you!
However you should move your thread here, so as not to cause confusion.
It's also a good way for players to answer and learn from each other at some point. You only need to open another ticket entry, and collect the problems that cannot be solved among players and hand them over to you to deal with. In Discord, the "TICKETS" robot is very useful.
In my opinion, I believe that Discord is not otherwise necessary, if you want to open a ticket here privately, you will also have the answer or help with whoever you are appealing.
Discord is other than a kind of WhatsApp community, in (AI) form nothing more. Everyone has their choice.
Reading on Trustpilot, the opinions are rather mixed or even very negative, especially concerning this security platform.
I have both FS2 and FS4. I probably still use FS2 more mainly because it has much better world coverage, esp. NA. It's a pity that there hasn't been more 3rd party support for FS4 DLC's like there was with FS2. I guess most of those previous FS2 developers have exclusively joined the msfs bandwagon. Too bad imho. Hopefully FS4 will get some additional coverage over time.
Regarding JustFlight, yes, they all left on MSFS, I can confirm that to you.
Hi aenbacka,
I was just wondering if there was anything new about this Cub?
Thank you
I do take airport requests and in future I will also make some airports in Africa.
Since we are in the proposals, I was also thinking of Tunisia, that of Djerba-Zarzis and Monastir. THANKS
The question is good!
In the meantime you can still already enjoy these textures at 15000 feet minimum but without cultivation. 
I'm not going to impose myself on the VR experience, I don't have it yet. Question of immersion, yes, FPS level, no, I run on average between 120 and 140 FPS, it all depends on your PC configuration, and you have to choose these addons carefully so as not to arrive in the descent into hell. Now concerning the cameras, it's just optional, the idea of squatting from the inside as well as from the outside and also taking stock of the finish. But everyone has their own piece of the pie.
Good evening
Thomas, it is clear that you cannot compare with this. (MSFS) For me, I don't even want to see that kind of picture above, and let's keep in mind that it's beautiful from the outside.
Display MoreHonestly guys from IPACS , I changed from FS 2 to FS 4 because I was expecting a lot lot more , so also that traffic , ground communication , whole weather profiles aso. was just normal that it is there in version 4 while asking already for years ( if u want to use it or not , its up to everyone ) , like as any other sim , I mean this is version 4 !! . and honestly I was expecting much much much more then that-- !! i mean we jumped up "2 " TWO full versions from V2 to V4 not from V2_1 to V2.1.0.5 .. but this is exactly the same sim , same horrible very old menu ,same stuff , got rid of that flighing school and put a new menu with challenges , honestly again ,even programming a flight route , this menu could have been written in DOS , so bad is the navigation to put some more VOR spots or change a route , not even saving or editing a saved own route is possible , and everything else there is not really something what changed what could justify that price for a whole new game (sim) !! , I mean if this would have been sold as an update from 2.0 to maybe 2.3 then I would accept that still nothing really changed . , but now .. like this , . its a shame for the money we spent !!! so for people who are not have spent that money yet , i propose waiting for version 27 , maybe then it makes sense to change !! thanks for spending money for nothing!!.
IPACS:
-new lighting engine - the word sounds good but in real it.s a joke those light changes
-Over 1200 hand made high quality airports , . u guys really joking !!, . most of all the airports still looking the same shit then v2 - some rectangular blocks putting together as like a sprite in commodore 64 , nothing else. In the year of 2023 this must be the lowest settings in graphic menu possible ) oh i forgot , there is no real graphic settings menu in this sim !
-scenery 3d buildings everywhere and trees , haha ,. I have to do a youtube video flying for 2 hours anywhere over some blocks , or so called mountains looks all like minecraft in lowest settings
-Air traffic -.. c-mon . , tell me , where is air traffic , . i mean somebody mensioned already - air traffic for ipacs means , some airplanes are starting and landing from nowhere to disappear in nowhere , no sense at all , . and air traffic is something else !! communication ,real TCAS aso.
Flight Missions is just a programmed route , flying a default setting .. Carrier Assistance and new Aircrafts .. wow again that sounds amazing , if it would have been sold as an Add-on .. but thats it , .. in real nothing what gives the customer anything to justify to buy a whole new game from V2 to v4 at all !.
thanks , thats my opinion about V4 (and many others to if u watch some youtubers starting to complain)
Just a question: I wonder how many new multiple nicknames, are found here on this forum??? I have the impression that it's already seen and heard. 
OOPS, sorry Thomas for my mistake, I hadn't paid attention to this VR mode, Jet-Pack (IPACS) should be able to give you the answer.
Hi Thomas,
You have the explanations on this thread, maybe it will help you, or if not send me a PM.
Good evening
One that I particularly like is this one
And I would add again, special thanks to some members of this community for all their efforts in making this SIM even better.
Scenery is pretty bad in overall. If I exclude a ton of buildings, and vegetation added, which is plus nonetheless, the most importantly, ortho imagery is just bad in colors and resolution. It's usable over 30k feet only. I mean I get it, IPACS used a free cloudless ZL13/14 source, but there should be a better solution, probably by using custom made EU ZL16 ortho. Will definitely try that. I have an amazing Switzerland HD for AFS2, and I don't have a clue can I use it in ASF4 and how (it's an addon from Steam).
Well seen! In my opinion it is this point you referred to which is the most important and which should be reviewed from the start, especially with an irregular mesh.
So please tell us which camera views you would like to see added?
Hello Jan, it would be really nice if you could add this view for A320, because unfortunately twice, my code file in the C:\ database that I had modified has been deleted? It's annoying to add it every time despite a backup.
So it would be nice if this additional camera was added by default. THANKS!
Thanks for this latest update, specially designed for airplanes and the addition of new cameras.
However, I see that nothing that was desired by part of the community since the beginning of the year has been corrected or added?
Flattening fix in some areas, or mesh fix, not even a new SDK for cultivation or even planes? Except that of the DR400.
Should we expect something new by the second semester?
Thanks for your reply
