Posts by Sparriet


    can anyone send me a folder with the files needed to add our own objects ? The command prompt keeps giving me a configuration error.

    Thank you all,

    Ester .

    Have you gone through the Developer Blogs here in the Forum? about Developing Add-On Stuffs for Aerofly. I think you will find a Solution to the Problem.

    If still nothing Happens or Happened let the Moderators know about it. :)

    I may be wrong or Right.. :/ But does the PC and Mobile Version share the same Base Source Code?

    Well, if Yes then being so easy why Dear IPACS Team do not add them by only Changing some files from Mobile? ( Is this tough from their End or they need to get the Textures, Polygons, VULKAN Texture Mapping and other stuffs on line and up to standards for PC Platform? ) or Is there some other Story? as seeing that our beloved Community Member is so easily getting the features to come to PC that we desperately need, which we all expect that the Developer IPACS team will add but they aren't is making me feel very very Disappointed. :(:( ( I am keeping Faith in IPACS Team that they will bring out nice things with perfection at some point but seeing all these I am Struggling to keep my faith over our beloved IPACS Team ).

    Sir Jet-Pack (IPACS)  admin , Can you please Clarify the reason why you are not adding those features in PC but a single person is easily doing it?? X/ :?:

    It is really getting hard for me to keep my patience. I really love Aerofly FS and IPACS but seeing all these :| . :!: Please do not Hurt my feelings for this Team ;(

    Generally I fly Long-Haul to Medium-Haul flights in Aerofly FS 2 with IFR . But, recently for the past 1 week I am flying VFR with Cessna-172 and fly-past in the Canyon with F-18.

    I noticed that in upper skies the Wind Conditions that I set in the menu for the flight flows and behaves accurately as that of real life when above 4000ft . But, now as I am flying in VFR at low-Altitudes in between Mountains the Wind does not behave accurately. I mean the wind flow do not care about obstacles in its path and flows uniformly. I tested a lot but I cannot feel the streams ANABATIC and KATABATIC winds (that develop between the Mountain Slopes). They are much harder to handle in mountains if strong winds above 20knts are blowing over mountains. I mean FOEN in the Alps Mountains. These winds are not simulated in Aerofly but I found this wind in MSFS.

    Sir Jet-Pack (IPACS) , Is it possible to get it in Aerofly? It will be very helpful so as to practice mountain Flying accurately. ""If you need to check what I mean make a VFR Flight to Innsbruck with Winds set to medium and direction set to East and thermals set to medium then you will feel that the wind flow is uniform everywhere the mountains do not block the flow nor create the FOEN winds.""

    I hope you will look to this matter :)

    Flying in falling snow is seriously attention grabbing, not for the faint hearted.

    I really wish the Team members at some point might make some plans to bring a complete overhaul to their Graphics Engine with a brand new Environment Modelling System that can easily bring up Volumetric Clouds, Particle Effects, light Scattering... and lot more with Next-Gen Lighting model not the Static Lighting model.

    I really hope that we will get to see it at some point. but, its like " You Pulled out a Bucket of water from Ocean ". So, very very leeesssss Chances of coming in near future. But, i have faith that one day we will fly with an upgraded Engine of Aerofly :)^^

    if i have an xbox controller will the controls disappear or not?

    No, the control icons will still be visible on screen but with some quite changes. But, no worries you can easily make it hide by the process that was mentioned by Sir Lucas Bravo in this thread

    Documents > Aerofly FS2 folder > main.mcf open this file with Notepad ++ search for "Fade_controls" and change from "false" to "true"!

    This will easily fix the issue you are Facing :)

    Using a keyboard and mouse to control aircraft in this flight simulator is not a good idea, this is made to be used with joysticks and throttle quadrants,

    Yes, you are right.. But, if anyone can't afford those for any reason then the solution is to get VJOYSTICK installed in his/her PC. By this they can get the feel of Yoke through their Mouse.

    1. I am pasting the link in here to Download it. --

    2. How to use it, he/she can visit YouTube for it and if unable to figure out I will help :)

    Hope this helps for those who currently don't have a Yoke. I personally used it for 5+ months until I bought a Yoke and it's really helpful and easy to use. :)

    any cleared reason for this?by IPACS

    You can hope that your requested 747-8 may come to Aerofly Series after more 3-4 Years Later.. Maybe 8o . Who Knows?

    Well, the reason maybe as they are working on other stuffs for Aerofly and already if I am not wrong they already have some Aircrafts in their Waiting List.. So, the Answer is Maybe in Future... :D

    I tried to look for it with the developer camera and I didn't find it, developer camera moves so fast and the plane would be so small to find.

    I went to the exact location and it was empty.

    I also looked into tm.log file and I'm not sure it even loaded it, because I searched ''dc10'' from there and it didn't find it.

    Exactly! Same for me as well. I searched Every Direction of the specified Location but Failed to Spot the Tanker.. :(

    Hello aerosimmers,

    I saw some A320 liveries to download for the sharklets model, but I dont have any A320 with sharklets on my Aerofly FS 2 (PC). Its already available and not working here?

    Thank you

    No Sir, Unfortunately the Sharklet version of A320 is not officially available for PC version but one of our Beloved and Talented Member of this Growing Community successfully ported the A320 Sharklet version from Mobile to PC. His User Name is P L A Y You can DM him and Chat for further Information :)

    The tricky bit would be simulating the docking of the nozzle and the weight transfer. Because obviously we want the other aircraft to have proper physics when we can interact with them.

    Aircraft carrier, push back, aerial refueling etc. all require a new system to load models with physics which we haven't gotten around to programming yet. In my opinion it's just a matter.

    Exactly what I thought... :D:D . But No Spooking about "Animated Physical Water System".