It seems as if a lot of major airports are still missing “pushback” starting positions.
Some in the United States include Phoenix, Newark, New York LGA, Salt Lake City, San Diego, Ontario, Orange County, Burbank, Reno, Baltimore, and more.
It seems as if a lot of major airports are still missing “pushback” starting positions.
Some in the United States include Phoenix, Newark, New York LGA, Salt Lake City, San Diego, Ontario, Orange County, Burbank, Reno, Baltimore, and more.
Aerofly only posts teasers when the product is nearly finished/in testing fase so I think it will come out in a maximum of 1-2 months probably earlier I hope
Not necessarily. Aerofly posted full pictures of the 737 MAX 9 in June 2023 and it didn't get released until February 2024.
I would hope the A321 is coming a lot sooner though.
Display MoreJet-Pack (IPACS) (Not trying to be a pest with this one)
I’m a bit upset that there is no A330 on the horizon, but I’m extremely impressed with the quality so far. I’m especially happy given the engine choice within the A321.
I have questions that I’d like to be addressed:1) If possible, could the Delta A321 be registered as N112DN? I’ve flown on this airframe multiple times by chance (first during its second week of service in 2021!) and this airframe holds many memories for me. If possible, can this livery be made? (I wish I could fly it to a 3D KMSP )
2) Since IAE engines are possible, can a QantasLink A320 be made?
3) PLEASE ANSWER THIS ONE: for the A321, pretty please, with a cherry on top, can new Air France, Swiss, and Jetstar A321s be made?
Again, great work with this new development. I hope to hear from you shortly regarding these slight things.
I can assure you, you’re not a pest. I don’t believe you’re getting the developers’ attention. You’ve only posted that 3 times within the 24 hours, you should post it more. Maybe by the 10th time, they’ll notice.
There's a very big opportunity to add more U.S. airlines here.
JetBlue already confirmed, hopefully Frontier and Spirit are next.
And more European airlines is a must, like Wizz, Iberia, Jet2, Finnair (please), and Vueling
Wow, the A321 looks amazing!
Great to see another U.S. operator with JetBlue!
Hopefully Spirit and Frontier next?
Portland, Oregon KPDX airport's control tower view is not displaying correctly.
Such a statistic would be heavily biased towards planes that are already in the base product and aren't an in app purchase.
Really? I’m surprised the majority of users aren’t purchasing the aircraft bundle
I had (still have) the same issue from a few months ago: Why was there a pole on the runway?
I thought the devs said St. Maarten and St. Barths will get custom updates eventually
It could be that the spoilers are deployed too early, perhaps I can change that easily.
That could solve it. A lot of times the main gear is halfway from fully touching down and then the spoilers force it down roughly
Does anyone else feel the 777's spoilers are too "aggressive" when landing? When you land, it could be a smooth touchdown, but then the spoilers deploy and it forces the 777 onto the ground harshly, which isn't very realistic.
Can this be fixed or adjusted Jet-Pack (IPACS) admin ?
Did Madeira get HD scenery?
Do you need any other information admin? I landed in Hong Kong again, and another pole causing my aircraft to crash. There's a pole at the end of every runway.
What do you both think, Jet-Pack (IPACS) and admin?
There’s already 6 liveries in Aerofly that were never flown in real-life (4 of which are on the 737-500), so surely it wouldn’t hurt to add 3 more on the 737-900/MAX 9, perhaps temporarily until the 737-800/MAX 8 comes out? (If/when that happens).
You may get a few complaints or jokes, but if you want, a good solution would be noting in the Aerofly livery selector that they aren’t real-life liveries. It doesn’t hurt anyone as they don’t have to fly those liveries, but adding the liveries would massively benefit users.
Please consider this.
Yes, perhaps we should remove the fake Q400 repaint to be more consistent. It was made by one of the designers for fun and wasn't actually supposed to be released.
There are other liveries in Aerofly that never existed in real life:
- Cathay Pacific A320
- American West 737-500
- Delta 737-500
- Sun Country 737-500
- Southwest "California One" 737-500
Why were these added to Aerofly if they never existed? Most notably here, there are many 737-500 liveries that never existed. Could this not apply to allowing the Southwest, Ryanair, and American liveries on the 737-900 or MAX 9?
Let your designers have fun and give us these major operators. It feels like a massive waste not to be able to fly them on Aerofly's amazing new 737s.
Unless of course, you do plan to add the 737 MAX 8 or -800 in the near future. Otherwise adding these "fake" liveries to the -900 and MAX 9 can serve as a solution in the short term.
Thekingbuji333 Can you not hijack my topic? You’ve made a ton of posts and topics in other places asking for those liveries and other requests. Just go make a new topic for those items and delete your posts here.
We limit the liveries to those that actually exist in the real world. None of the airlines that you mentioned flies the 737 MAX 9 or -900ER.
But Air New Zealand never flew the Q400 and it was added to Aerofly a few months ago.
I’m sure the community wouldn’t mind having a few “fake” liveries since these airlines are so large?