Posts by Flyish
-
-
Yes, perhaps we should remove the fake Q400 repaint to be more consistent. It was made by one of the designers for fun and wasn't actually supposed to be released.
There are other liveries in Aerofly that never existed in real life:
- Cathay Pacific A320
- American West 737-500
- Delta 737-500
- Sun Country 737-500
- Southwest "California One" 737-500
Why were these added to Aerofly if they never existed? Most notably here, there are many 737-500 liveries that never existed. Could this not apply to allowing the Southwest, Ryanair, and American liveries on the 737-900 or MAX 9?
Let your designers have fun and give us these major operators. It feels like a massive waste not to be able to fly them on Aerofly's amazing new 737s.
Unless of course, you do plan to add the 737 MAX 8 or -800 in the near future. Otherwise adding these "fake" liveries to the -900 and MAX 9 can serve as a solution in the short term. -
Thekingbuji333 Can you not hijack my topic? You’ve made a ton of posts and topics in other places asking for those liveries and other requests. Just go make a new topic for those items and delete your posts here.
-
We limit the liveries to those that actually exist in the real world. None of the airlines that you mentioned flies the 737 MAX 9 or -900ER.
But Air New Zealand never flew the Q400 and it was added to Aerofly a few months ago.
I’m sure the community wouldn’t mind having a few “fake” liveries since these airlines are so large? -
My iPad doesn't have the new high resolution scenery.
I just installed Aerofly on my iPhone and it isn't there either. -
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Hear me out.
Obviously Southwest, Ryanair, and American do not fly the 737-900 and 737 MAX 9 in real life. There are only a few "unrealistic" liveries in Aerofly that have either been intentionally added or added by mistake (Air New Zealand Q400 for example).
However, I would like to see the developers add these 3 liveries to the 737-900 and/or 737 MAX 9. They are the largest Boeing 737 operators and it would be a shame not to have these liveries on Aerofly's fantastic 737-900/MAX 9. To me, it feels like a waste not being able to fully take advantage of Aerofly's large United States and Europe regions with these massive operators. They would unlock a multitude of real routes we could fly.
I do not believe the developers have said anything about adding the 737-800 or the MAX 8 in the near future, so as a more simple solution, wouldn't it make sense to add these 3 liveries onto the 737-900 and/or MAX 9?
What are your thoughts? -
Ever since FS Global came out, some airports lost their blue/green runway or taxi lights.
For example, Los Angeles and San Francisco no longer have the green runway lights that mark taxi paths or runway exits.
Will these be re-added later for airports that are missing these lights? -
Have you heard the max9 in the rea world ? it is more like 737-900 in this game
I have and it sounds very similar. There shouldn't be a loud buzzing sound with the MAX and Aerofly captured it.
-
I thought the MAX 9 engine is already realistic. What’s wrong with it?
-
What version are you using, please be detailed.
I'm on iOS 1.0.35
iPad Pro 2nd Generation -
I'm not sure how the algorithm works for clearing the approach but it probably requires a certain order in which data is loaded. If the device memory is already full and no additional data can be loaded this might cause an issue like this. I'm not sure though. admin any thoughts on why the algorithm sometimes fails to clear the approach?
Any update admin ? Just flew into Hong Kong again, another pole on the runway causing me to crash into the ground after a 2 hour flight.
The terminal wasn't fully loaded in as well, so I guess that's a memory/data issue? -
Would also be nice to have the new Alaska Airlines livery, despite the aircraft being retired.
Air Berlin too, considering there are a ton of static models at airports.
Luxair, LOT, AirBaltic as well.
-
Thanks admin Jet-Pack (IPACS) and the rest of the team for all these Asia airports lately!
Next up, South Korea? We’ve got 3 aircraft with Korean Air liveries (737-900, A380, 747) + Air Busan 737-500
-
It's not even a big deal, like it is so bad that it makes it so unbearable to fly with? Like no offence when something doesn't go the way you want you start screaming like an infant ?
I'm certainly not the only one that would like to see these errors fixed. No where did I say this was unbearable, but I and others have been waiting for over two years for this to be fixed.
And please feel free to point out where I'm screaming like an infant. -
Aerofly developers, I really appreciate all the updates and bug fixes. However, there's some errors that have been in Aerofly (including FS Global) for over two years now that I really wish to see fixed soon.
When Aerofly released the 787-10 over two years ago, the United Airlines livery had several errors that were never fixed. Here's a real-life picture: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/11078496
When you look at Aerofly's 787-10, the "UNITED" text is misplaced and not long enough. The "U" in UNITED should start behind the first window and the "D" should extend past the second door (when looking at the left side of the aircraft. On the right side of the aircraft, the U should start before the second door and the D should end before the first window: https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/10817298).
Additionally, the blue swoop towards the end of Aerofly's United 787-10 should not go above the horizontal stabilizer.
The registration should be placed next to the American flag and not below the windows.
Additionally, the EVA 787-10 in Aerofly could really use a color update to match the EVA 777.
Can these errors on 787 liveries finally be fixed after over two years? -
When the copilot is flying it needs to be able to set flaps and gear. That is intended behavior.
I’m confused, you just said it’s possible to disable it, but now the copilot must have auto flaps?
When I say Copilot, I mean manually entering the headings, altitude, and ascent/descent rate but not the automatic “follow the routing” with Copilot. I understand the follow the routing feature of Copilot must have auto flaps and gear -
Agree with Qantas and Virgin Atlantic, not sure about Atlas Air...
Atlas Air has no scheduled flights but does a bunch of random charters to military bases alongside sports charters. That would be a very cool addition. We don't really have any liveries in Aerofly that do something like that in real life.
-
Yes in the settings menu in assistance you can turn this off.
I'd recommend keeping the assistances auto brake and auto tuning enabled. If you are not familiar with the operation of the airliners in detail then keep auto cockpit, auto warnings and auto landing lights enabled as well.
I already have auto flaps disabled in the flight assistant, but the copilot still automatically sets the flaps. I guess it's a glitch then?
-
When flying with the copilot, once you reach around 5,000 ft on descent, the copilot will automatically extend the flaps. Is there a way to disable this? It's annoying because it doesn't correspond with the aircraft's speed, so many times the Copilot's flap extensions will push the aircraft downward.
-
Have the developers said why we can't do cold and dark or "before engine startup" when manually selecting a starting position on the ground instead of needing to rely on the provided positions?