How do they deal with the AIRAC? Do users pay a subscription fee?
When you have a Navigraph subscription:
10 secondes.
97€/month
Playload is taken care of ?
Fuel consumption is taken care of ?
And to calculate all of this, SimBrief is taken care of using the latest AIRAC from Navigraph ?
1. I think Aerofly could implement rain and snow, giving the game a more realistic touch.
2. I know no one cares but they should make the clouds stay in the same position when moving the outside camera.3. Be mindful of the ground crew. You can have the pushback take the plane on its own without the hassle of having to do it by indicating which side you want the plane on.
4. You can add a parking indicator, have the plane open the baggage and passenger doors, and provide ground handling. Adding people is optional, except for the parking indicator.5. I talked about multiplayer and ATC on another occasion, and some people got offended when I mentioned it. I'm fine with the idea of implementing this into the game; it would make it a little more engaging, generate more downloads, and benefit the developers. I understand it can be complicated. Please don't get upset; I'm just giving my opinion.
I switched
The RNAV ends many miles away from the runway, whereas the today RNAV Z 08 transition ELMEM brings you to the threshold.
If I remember well, in Japan I used 2201 which was OK for routes but terrible for SID and STAR that seem to be from 1301.
Things are coming from 1301 and other, it is a kind of mix.
Unfortunately, in 1301, you will not have mordern RNAV that guide you to the runway threshold (like it is the case today at La Palma, Innsbruck, Aspen, Paro, etc.)
1301 especially in Europe.
Back too?
Not really. It’s now fully and totally impossible.
I’m keeping an eye here and there…
Or should I assign another axis for reverse thrust?
I do no longer remember. But, I think reverses simply work after my little tutorial. As you calibrate from idle to mid flex/toga, when using it going above idle for reverse, it should trigger the reverses.
I begin to forget seriously.
This is what I used to do when I was an Aerofly user:
In Aerofly, at the time of phase 1 of calibration, move the FLAPS and SPEED BRAKE levers in all their amplitude, but for the throttles do not go further than between FLEX and TOGA from IDLE:
Then, in phase 2 of the calibration, center FLAPS on 2 and SPEED BRAKE on 1/2 and THROTTLE on CLIMB (this phase actually seems to have no effect).
This method makes it possible to fully engage the CL trigger, but on the other hand makes it more delicate, but very correct, the engagement of the FLEX notch. However, it is less evil than losing the A/THR in mid-flight!
Hi. If I remember well, I used AIRAC 1301 which somewhat worked with Europe. 2201 was good for Japan but for SID and STAR was terrible. Regards
Isn’t it, how to flare?
Truman Show
This is it. That explains all.
which makes a very small difference for the actual flight
But today, there are RNAV approaches that bring you to the threshold of the runway (Aspen, Innsbruck, Madeira, ...).
The essential is to understand that Navigraph will never be embedded to Aerofly FS 4 and probably not to a future Aerofly FS 5.
The developers have just brought two excellent planes to Aerofly (Boeing 737-900ER and 737 Max 9). This is not the time to ask for more planes considering that this is very hard and difficult work. Let's at least let them breathe.
If it's not a new plane it will be something else. Not sure they take time to breath.
other simulators have done this if there is a will there is a way !
Or course there’s a way. But this way is probably not built in and would have to be done.
what about using 2203 airac of navigraph ?
Why not, but is it technically possible for Aerofly? Is it able to interpret external database?
I bet it is not (because the actual way of doing routes is probably a homemade solution)
Can you tell me how I can enjoy this game?
Calm down, I totally agree…
IPACS also say you will never get Navigraph 
because it would not cover all the users (only those who can afford to).
And once again, what if the actual system is not able to import external database without a deep rework (all FMS/MCDU, navigation menu, etc.).
I didn’t intend to be the once who showered your hopes. Sorry.
x plane can do it, why can't you?
What if the way the database is built is such a way that it is fully incompatible with external data like Navigraph?
Or what if Aerofly is unable to interpret external data (without a deep rework)?
The AIRAC is outdated so some may not exist. If I may ask, where were you flying?
in this case, you can prepare your flight plan with aerofly and it’s now waypoints. Delete it. Some will not be found in the MCDU.
