The most popular and most requested is the 737-800
I I remember correctly it was the a350 and a330 since aerofly fs 2020
Posts by Quichenic
-
-
Should the devs add the a220 (airbaltic) to aerofly 2023?
They most likely won't since there are other aircrafts that are needed more and requested more like the a350 and the a330
-
Is there a way to set up things like engines or instruments set to fail after a certain time interval?
No but what I like to do is turn 1 or both engines of to simulate an engine failure
-
You are spot on! Any sort or form of communication on this by the Ipacs team would greatly appreciated. ILS that actually align you with the runway, A320 that doesn’t crash after a flight once you shut down engines with apu running, taxiway bridges that you can cross without falling into the ground, F18 with controllable air brakes, f18 where the baro altimeter works again, …. It’s September and everybody talks about 2023 version… before 2022 is fixed…..??? Really
We talk about fs 2023 because when fs 2023 comes out most of these bug will already be fixed and the fs2022 version won't get alot of updates anymore
-
@ashwad: Thank you for your feedback, it motivates us a lot. There will be quite a few exciting updates coming this year, so stay tuned for more content and features.
Hopefully there will be e few exciting updates for mobile too
-
We have also thought about a walkaround and I think this is a really great idea. I'm not sure when this will be added.
Creating a new aircraft like the F16 is quite a bit of work and personally I have the feeling that we already have quite a selection of fighter jets and that maybe a different aircraft category should get more attention. Military aircraft documentation is also usually not as easy to come by on the internet, which adds another challenge for us.
I hope the walk around feature gets added to fs 2023 and I hope that there will be an f-16 in the future since its my fav aircraft
-
Well there are over 2000+ airports, which ones did you try?
It's not an airport bug the MCDU of the a320 automatically puts the BARO at - 1440 it doesn't matter at what airport it does it at all airports and if I put every airport I tried it would be like 80+ airports
-
The issue is probably in the airport elevation data not in the a320. That's why I would like to know if it's just UK airports for example or only European airports or if the cheat code returns -1440 ft regardless of airport.
It does it at every airport I tried us, Europe, UK
-
What does the yellow MM stand for? When I was landing at edde I saw it flashing
-
Will we get more features for the 777 in aerofly fs 2023? I think it lacks alot of features compared to other aircrafts, I can also make a list of things that can be added for the 777 if it's needed.
-
Just tell what airport the -1440 BARO bug occurs.
Like I said it happens at all airports
-
Yes but why do you put a negative sign in there? Only two or three airports that we model are actually below sea level and the barometric minimum is at least 100ft above that so the lowest realistic value is -20ft or so and not -1000. I'm not sure the MCDU even allows values that far negative in the real world.
When I tap on the baro it automatically makes it - 1440
-
Please tell us which airports this affects.
All of them when I put in the baro the - will be inside the O
-
Hopefully in aerofly fs 2023 what airport is that?
-
Also the Miami region should be added back and the London city buildings
-
Display More
737-800, 747-8, 757-200 or 300, 767-300 or 400, 777-200, 787-8
————————————————————
-Multiplayer, price could be $0.99 a month or $4.99 a month $9.99 a year?
-Pushback
-more airlines and liveries
-More of USA, Europe, Australia, China, Korea
-Free camera
-Drone camera
-Dash camera
Here is the problem aerofly creates a new game every year so if you want multi-player by your rules thats a 1 time 10 dollars and you don't have to pay anymore since a new version is already coming meaning a monthly subscription is more likely to be added instead of a yearly subscription
-
More FMC functions on 777
More 777 features are needed in general its pretty much the only aircraft without a proper engine startup sound
-
There is a 60% chance that I will not get an answer to this question, but still: Jet-Pack (IPACS) , can you at least share some news about the development of the next version?
-
Please replace the (at) with the normal @.
I mailed it
-
@Quichenic: If it's less than 10MB, you may send it to us by email at mail(at)ipacs.de
When I type in the email it says that the email is not valid
