The P-51 is a good idea, but the bf109 for mobile and a horten229 would be also great.
Love the spiral on the bf109
Posts by Crane
-
-
Unfortunately we can't just assign one or two people to constantly work on maintaining a marketplace. This is a very time consuming task, validating user created content, pushing the external developers to publish updates and fixes when something breaks, forwarding support tickets to them and then there is the issue of copyright.
And once you charge money for it, it becomes a whole different story altogether. Then customers have certain expectations and hold us to a certain standard, basically demanding at least same quality from a third party aircraft as for default aircraft otherwise they complain to us. They expect that the purchased content works after each update or they release bad reviews for the app or sim platform (even though it's not our fault necessarily) so the entire work for maintaining the content falls on us all of the sudden. We simply do not have time for this, we're already busy enough to maintain our own aircraft, testing them before an update, managing the thousands of files that need changing so that the impact is as small as possible for the user.
Unfortunately history also has shown that even freeware high quality add-on aircraft are not being downloaded, e.g. our Q400 for Aerofly FS 2. And sales for payware add-on aircraft only reach a niche of customers so most add-on studios are jumping to the competition simulators where most customers are located, just to break even. That's not necessarily a bad thing for us, it means we can update things a lot faster without accidentally breaking things or slowing down the sim with legacy code support just for a handful of add-ons.
A marketplace would make sense if there are dozens of add-on studios developing content for your sim and it becomes too tedious for your customers to keep everything up to date. But we're not there yet, so I think our time is better spent on improving the core sim experience.
This doesn't mean users can't program their own market place, e.g. connect it to Github projects or Google drive downloads and so on.
Hello IPACS, i know this is an irrelevant question but would you “Sue” someone for using a paint kit?
-
I dont know about you but I’ve been saying this for a long time since we already have the 200 freighter and the 300 ER I think it’s time we get the passenger variant of the 200.
The Boeing 777-200ER "Extended Range" is a long-range, wide-body twinjet airliner, boasting a range of up to 8,889 miles 14,305km. And a typical seating capacity between 300 440 passengers, often in a 3-3-3 or 3-4-3 layout. First delivered in 1997 it features powerful GE90 or Rolls Royce & PW4000 engines with a 2-class Business & Economy or 3-class First,Business,Economy, configurations common.
I think it’ll be great to get the passenger variant of the 200 while it is the most popular 777 variant in the production line of the Boeing 777.
-
In my opinion we don't need a new 777 virant right now.
We already have the -300 and the -200 (the freighter).
Yeah I want the most popular 777-200ER Variant to be added.
-
A great person does not need to diminish another person to be better,
his worth is measured by the value he creates, not the competition he defeats.
Therefore:
A great product does not need to degrade another product to be better,
its worth is measured by the value it creates, not the competition it defeats.Naw bro IF gotta go they have a toxic fanbase bro they go around hating on AFS for literally no reason they think IF is better than every other flight sim AFS should be getting a higher up recognition it ACTUALLY deserves.
-
I want to see a sikorsky s-76
-
We don't see it on our devices. Please tell us your device type, operating system, version number and rendering API, in case you are on Android.
And my device is iPhone 15Plus 128 GB midnight black
-
We don't see it on our devices. Please tell us your device type, operating system, version number and rendering API, in case you are on Android.
This is on iOS. How do you guys not see this?
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy. -
So IPACS the windows are still sticking out on the A350 are you going to fix this? It’s really becoming an eyesore…. Like it looks weird.
Again JetPack if you look closely, you can see it
-
Do you have a screenshot of the issue?
Because the PFD has no map I'm not sure what you mean exactly...
I also cant activate the TERR on ND on the A320NEO
-
If you have IOS its Already out if you have android (Samsung) I think it is NOT out yet.
I dont see it yet.
-
Apart from the Transavia these repaints are available for the A320neo.
Whats on the 787 also?
-
Nah bruh, he teasing a teaser of a teaser while teasing a teaser for a teaser, you already said it brah
Da heel 😭
-
I hope the A320Neo cockpit windows won’t have those weird grey borders around them.
Yes it will have its own zoro mask
-
May be it’s a new plane 777-200 who knows ✈️
But I have also some different feeling that thew will add Embraer 190 or A220
Brotha we are getting 787-9 and a320neo what do you not get?
-
Before speculation gets out of hand...
We're planning to add two new planes in total with this massive update.
Hey, I have a question. Will The New 787 be up to A350 standards? Will it be as realistic as the A350?
-
Let’s not repeat what happened with the A350 threads.
-
JetPack where is Japan Airlines? Will it have JAL? Sorry im a JAL Fanboy lol
-
They have the 787-8, not 787-9
Yes they have the -9
-
I think the current A350 landing sound should be made more realistic and implemented on the Boeing 787-9. The ambient sounds inside the cockpit during taxiing should also be reproduced. Not only the sounds, but also the vibrations of the aircraft should be reproduced.
777 & 787-10 & 777F all need to have it
