Joyeux Noël à tous 🌲🎄🎄!
Posts by Joshua 80(A)
-
-
best phone to run aerofly in max(res) under 270USD,20k INR, 240 euros?
In that pricing. Hmph, try samsung phones. How much a A52 cost that is adreno 618 GPU. It can run well
-
Some more asian liveries :
Air asia:
Scoot airlines
Eva air
Jetstar (Viet)
-
That's more of a copyright thing than an Easter egg. The original A320 model was brought from Aerosoft and we've made many many changes since then.
I love their airbus aircrafts too. But for aerosoft in pc flight simulator games like fsx/p3dv5 fslabs beats the system realastism of aerosoft a320 professional/extended. But the aeroflys a320 is quite improved compared to aerosoft. I hope a330 will soon come for this simulator
-
…or the „aerosoft Airbus X“ label on the folding table of the A320…
Dude ipacs is aerosoft partner
-
Or a lack of fuel 😜
Failure options. That would add some more realastism. What i meant is, they can add maintenance realastism for aircrafts. Suppose if u do a tailstrike with boeing heavies like 747. There should be a real damage mark shown in the airplane. I know c172 had a realastic crash. I hope all aircrafts get it soon.
-
Would like to see that feature. We can also have engine failure options too due to lack of maintenance
-
Hello ipacs
Today just now i did my forest flight in crj 900 from Zurich to paris. When i entered the departure waypoints, i got a (INCPT) waypoint. Normally you can replace that incpt waypoint with the next waypoint for example: wurriel. But when I want to replace that incpt waypoint, i am getting a message like this: (not implemented). Is there any fix for flight discontinuity waypoints?
Waiting for your reply
J.a
-
To me known:
A320
737
777 (idk didn't test that)
787(cannot)
Crj900 (not sure)
Dash 8 (cannot)
Cessna (maybe)
King air and baron g58 has a missing door handle animation. If they add it you can open them also.
A380 (didn't test)
747 (cannot)
Learjet 45 (cannot)
Other that these aircrafts i didn't test the remaining ones with doors.
-
2022 and it's worth than 2020 nor 2021.
-
Display More
Hello fellow Captains
I've been reading the forums tonight and there are a few posts which I thought were overly negative.
Sure, there are bugs in this initial release - but this is a complex application and I'm sure they will get fixed over the coming weeks.
The new lighting model and new clouds are beautiful - actually stunning and very GPU demanding. I'd recommend you try this latest generation of Aerofly on iOS devices with an A11 soc or later with minimum 3GB RAM.
Flying a KLM 787 Dreamliner over Amsterdam at sundown is, simply put - amazing.
Who else is enjoying Aerofly FS 2022?
Me worth try than af 2021. Regretted that purchase but loved this af 2022.
-
One thing I'm Clear that both iOS and Android has its own limits. All mobile phones aren't PC computers to add every features such as buildings,trees,hd 4k sceneries. First of all adding them will have a impact on the following:
Fps, device storage will decrease.
Considering this, yes I agree we missed London 3d buildings and not only them. Swiss area also i noticed there are some buildings missing. They will fix it in future. But remember this may or may not come for android due to performance issues. You can implement many features for iOS and Android. But think that iOS also has its own limits. You can't stuff many things on iOS just like that. It's like eating a burger a day. If you stuff many things a day you'll get fat right? The same applies for android and iOS. Not everything can be implemented on iOS and Android just like that. Maybe they will consider it in future. If it is streamable scenery you will get all features like buildings,crops,4k scenery,real landscapes and more..... it will no longer impact the storage and load time
Supporting your point, we don't have Eiffel tower in Paris the great dissapointment is that. Another thing is that the Italy Pisa tower is also missing. So i hope they add this in future. They can do one thing is that (streaming the scenery via cloud). But again that requires subscription not to mention them. Just giving a idea.
-
Landings have to be on a runway in order to count. Not before the runway, not sideways of the runway and it could be that bounces are not counted correctly.
Where did you land, maybe there is a mistake in the airport?
Maybe you should add a option to record the landing while landing on grass. Because there are some grass airports in west countries.
-
Aerofly FS 2022, less than 12 GB (all included)
Totally how much storage it takes with all sceneries downloaded for ipad? Just asking because i didn't test yet those sceneries. Im flying with base app for a while.
-
I have limited space on my Ipad and I need to know what to expect
Just download 1 region if you can. Otherwise, enjoy with the base app. More or less airports and scenery quality difference. Nothing else is new.
-
What about the Concorde
what about United concept supersonic jet?
-
What about sr-71?
-
As for system requirements on iOS: They are slightly higher than FS 2021, e.g. especially the memory footprint is higher and the CPU is doing more work. An iPhone SE ( version 1 ) might no longer be a good solution, the current iPhone SE however is just fine. All new and currently available iPhone devices are just fine also, e.g. iPhone 12/13. Also all new and currently available iPad devices are just fine. Expect more performance optimizations once we get more user feedback in certain scenarios.
Some airports are very detailed, for example Frankfurt, so this might be a little too much detail for some devices.
What about ipad 8th gen?
-
Review used to take 2 hours, now 72 or thereabouts. Remember it’s the weekend too so a release will probably be Tuesday or Wednesday depending on how fast apple approve AF2022 after the weekend break. Only another few days, don’t lose your mind over it
Im also checking my app store when will it get published 😅😅
-
When will it be released for android?
End of December dont worry. Im happy that i luckily having ipad to test the af 2022
