Can I ask if full navigation databases will be implemented in the next version of Aerofly? I.e not just VORs/NDBs but actual waypoints and airways we can program our FMS/MCDU with.
Posts by andyminhho
-
-
Display More
The IRS alignment time is shorter than in the real world intentionally. This is optional in my developer build already.
The engines that you have also not yet what I already have in my developer build. These will be updated in the future.
IRS alignment time is a parameter in the tmd file that you can change easily. So are the display self test times.
We're already working on holdings but this is not an A320 only feature, we obviously want this to be available for all aircraft.
What other MCDU features would you like to see?
The MCDU can currently not be changed from the outside.
Oh that's great. I managed to fix the IRS alignment and engines myself so far, by digging through the files. I'm currently working on a more realistic IRS simulation - the ON BATT light appears. Any chance I could get my hands on that developer build?
-
Most systems in our A320 are already implemented and yes you could modify the aircraft tmd file to add in new systems.
Okay thanks, had some doubts because the folder size was kind of small
-
What exactly do you want to modify?
Because I spent dozens of hours making the FBW as realistic as possible.
And the 737 doesn't even have a fly by wire, so what does that have to do with it?
For a start, I have noticed that the engine start times and IRS align times are quite unrealistic, also there is functionality missing in the MCDU, like holds. Would It be possible to change/implement these things as a mod?
-
Is it possible for the A320's systems to be modified in order to create something similar to the FBW A320 in MSFS or Zibo 737 in X-Plane? I'd really like to know before I start digging. Or may I borrow the 3D model for the cockpit and exterior to make my own aircraft mod?
