Yes it would be great to be able to disable it on mobile.
Agreed
Yes it would be great to be able to disable it on mobile.
Agreed
Don't file a flight plan 🤫
I'm still waiting for UH60 interiors....
we are always here talking about civilian planes and fighter jets, but wouldn't it be a bad idea getting a functional cargo plane? (C5 galaxy, an124 and others like beluga or dreamlifter) and adding missions to transport cargo? or even fire fighting planes, beachcrafts, and others.
AN225...💔
I have the same problem on android, and also with the rudder controls. It just seems to jump to neutral when sliding to the left or to the right.
Same on Android(not beta)..
Throttle and rudder issues after new update
Antonov AN-225🥺💔
My vote is for Sikorsky S92 and Chinook CH47!
It is a throttle fuel flow or cut switch, forward is full fuel flow, back is restricted fuel flow. It does not seem to be implemented.
Yes!
Today I learnt about that switch from MSFS Ju52 guide..😄
It's called Normalgas.
(Throttle ON: Full throttle available, Throttle Stop: reduced throttle)
Pdf link: https://flightsimulator.azureedge.net/wp-content/upl…Ju52_Manual.pdf
Thank you, Ipacs! ❤️
But, I was asking about this switch..👇
Someone please explain these two switches I found:
1. Switch labelled FT on the electrical panel.
2. Switch in front of Throttle Levers.
Are we getting anything in the next 5 months..? I know a 737 is coming, but what about anything else *new*...? I hate to say this but I'm starting to lose faith. *sigh*
As always we might get preview by end of the year!!
Are we getting anything in the next 5 months..? I know a 737 is coming, but what about anything else *new*...? I hate to say this but I'm starting to lose faith. *sigh*
There will be another 1 or 2 new aircrafts/helis I guess 😄
Display MoreI wached this video:
Tutorial VTOL Procedures EC 135 V5
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.This is where the 120 ft decision height really comes into play. I'm not very good at English, but I think this refers to the stoppage of only one engine, not two. Land below 120 ft, continue the flight above it in one engine mode.
I think this because every helicopter has a height/velocity diagram, on which the areas where a safe landing is not guaranteed are marked. I couldn't find the EC135 anywhere on the internet, maybe because it has two engines. That's why I'm uploading a diagram with a single engine, the EC135 can be almost similar without an engine. This shows the approximate altitude from which you can land safely without an engine starting from a horizontal speed of 0 kt.
Here is the article:
Try to watch some autorotation videos..
You'll get to know how much energy a helicopter will be having even after engines are failed..
Even after trading altitude for speed and while slowing to 0 knots, we should be able to hover (by increasing collective)..
Display MoreI wached this video:
Tutorial VTOL Procedures EC 135 V5
External Content youtu.beContent embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.This is where the 120 ft decision height really comes into play. I'm not very good at English, but I think this refers to the stoppage of only one engine, not two. Land below 120 ft, continue the flight above it in one engine mode.
I think this because every helicopter has a height/velocity diagram, on which the areas where a safe landing is not guaranteed are marked. I couldn't find the EC135 anywhere on the internet, maybe because it has two engines. That's why I'm uploading a diagram with a single engine, the EC135 can be almost similar without an engine. This shows the approximate altitude from which you can land safely without an engine starting from a horizontal speed of 0 kt.
Here is the article:
Yes, you can try autorotation from 500ft.
You won't succeed landing this thing.
Is there any description of this take off procedure?
Watch rotorsimxp for detailed ec135 procedures:
I understand. But if I like to do the maneuver, although complicated in the UH60 but it is possible.
Yes, autorotations with forward speed can be achieved and it is also not realistic.
What's wrong with them?
Energy management is not correctly modelled...
You cannot get any speed by losing altitude when engine fails...
If you want to know what I mean follow these for ec135:
1. Takeoff like a real helicopter does(Takeoff backwards keeping an eye on helipad... Takeoff decision point for ec135 is 120ft AGL).
2. Fail both engines at 120ft.
3. TRY to land in helipad which is in front of you.
The autorotation maneuver is somewhat complicated in the UH60 Black hawk since the rotor blades lose energy even if the nose is turned down. But it is possible with practice. Instead the R22 and EC 135 is easy. I love helicopters. What do you think?
Autorotations are not implemented correctly...