Posts by Messerschmitt

Hello everyone

I‘m planing on buying the throttle from Honeycomp.

Does anyone have experience with the device ?

How is the workmanship and is it good for Aerofly?

Quote from W.B.

Please stop making wish on new aircraft’s, otherwise this sim will never grow.

IMHO, the sim needs more need actual novelties in the simulation features to improve the immersion and realism of the sim:

World and Scenery:

* More complex weather system.
* Water masking and rendering.
* Road masking and live ground traffic (we used to have them in the old AFS2 Florida scenery but somehow don’t see any progress for years).
* Better (more accurate and various) building autogen. The current autogen model style looks good in some European countries like Germany, but as the map is extending to the whole world, those autogens can look strange. In addition, there are many incorrectly placed buildings or trees around the airport which look very strange.
* Terrain in the airports: bumps are everywhere between runways and taxiways in many major airports around the globe.
* More realistic lights (runway, runway threshold, taxiway, street)

System Depth (add to existing aircraft）

* Fuel and payload.
* ATC and radio system.
* More functional FMC.

Details that add immersions

* Particle effects.
* Better visual or auditory effects, e.g, touchdown feedback, sound of the gears and aircraft body shacking when the plane is moving on the ground. More realistic vibrations at the wing tips etc.

I understand that many of these features take massive resources to research and could be much more difficult to achieve comparing with making a shorter variation of the A320. And I understand that the focus of Aerofly is on the mobile end and some of these features can be to demanding. But I really enjoy the easy flying experience in Aerofly and hope to continue enjoying it but with a bit more immersion.

Display More

I can only agree with that

Quote from stavka

Exactly, this flight sim have already enough aircraft. What we need is features to the core to make it a real competitor to other flight sims.

Another aircraft is only to hhave another aircraft that we can't have rain, real weather, atc, configuration of load/fuel, fuel consuption (yes, a shame to want another aircraft, another aircraft another aircraft, when even the core aircraft have infinite fuel).

This could be an amazing flight sim that could be another option against the real flight sims, and still be an arcade flight sim like a mobile app to use vr.

Its really sad because even the current included aircraft mix is better than any other flight sims, all the other features are worst....

We need:

ATC (even rudimentary, promissed since afs2 for years)

real weather from metar (including rain)

navigraph database updates compatability

Aircraft feature that can change fuel and cargo/pax with real fuel consuming.

THAT features improves all current aircraft and future ones to a new level, and not another half backed aircraft to the already enough aircraft hangar where you can't have rain, atc etc.

Sorry, all this rant, but i trully want to love afs4 as my nr1 sim, but now its getting dust and rust because if i want a flight sim experience others provide better, even having vr...

Display More

I can only agree, please no more aircraft but a future development with more depth.There are so many things missing to become a simulation. Afs4 has the chance to become a really big player on the market but only if they make the effort to Programm thinks like ATC,real weather,more realistic airfields, movements on the ground and so on.Unfortunately the current development is leading in a completely wrong direction, constantly creating new aircraft without paying attention to those that pay more attention to realism is, in my opinion,the completely wrong approach.Afs4 is a really great simulation and it’s a shame that there hasn’t been much development in terms of realism’s in recent years.

Dear developers, I would be happy if the upcoming things weren’t just airplanes.

I can only agree that without ATC and weather a big part is simply missing, only this creates more realism in the simulation.

Otherwise it is a great simulation

Hello IPACS

Like all of your aircraft, the new A321 is once again a great success.

You have proven many times that you are a great team and that you can program really realistically.

Unfortunately, the weather,ATC and movements on the bottom are missing for a real simulation.

Maybe others can join this post to add a little more realism to the simulation.

Please don’t misunderstand these lines, I appreciate your simulation, but it is very quiet in the cockpit without ATC and

Without weather an important part is missing.

Thanks for your good work