Posts by Juan507Antonio

  • B747 more updt

    Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

    Building the -200 would take many months because the entire cockpit would have to be redone from scratch. I don't see this as a viable option, it's too much work. If we were to invest this much time we're already half way to a brand new aircraft.

    The 747-8 has entirely new wings and engines, this also would take months, though a bit less than the cockpit. It can be done but it's still a lot of work.

    Something that would be much easier actually is a 747-400F.

    You haveYes, I would like a 747-8 but you are right in what you say.

    It is better that if they add it, it is calm and that they take their time as they have done with other aircraft.

    What I would like more important is that they update the Boeing 747-400 which is already in the simulator

    The 747-400 that's in the simulator as far as I know hasn't been touched since it was released for the first versions of Aerofly.

    The red belly beacon light is misplaced, the tilt of the wing landing gear has more inclination on the real plane and retracting it will retract it at high speed, Updating the sounds of the plane as they did with the a350 and other aircraft, more liveries and as you say a cargo version would not be bad at all.

  • More 747 Liveries and more liveries in general

    Quote from FlyWorld

    I completely agree with you. Besides the new paint scheme, the 747-400 also needs a complete overhaul of its structure and appearance, which are currently very outdated. It would also be interesting to add a new variant like the 747-8F, which was the last and most recent model manufactured by Boeing.

    Yes, that's exactly what I've been saying. The Boeing 747-400 should receive an update, especially regarding the sounds in general, just like they did with the Boeing 737-500, A320, A380, 777-300ER, and other aircraft. The engine sounds date back to the initial release of Aerofly's FS and FS2 versions. They need to update the engine sounds, add APU sounds, flap sounds, etc., as well as make adjustments to the landing gear suspension. They also need to fix the lighting issue, as I've been saying that the red beacon light on the belly is poorly positioned. And they need more liveries like those of Thai Airways, Qantas, Atlas Air, and many others. It's an aircraft I really like, and there isn't much else to update besides what I've already mentioned.

    The 747-400's landing gear upgrade is that the tilt of the landing gear of the wings should be more tilted as seen in the image of a real 747.

    On the 747-400 you can see that the wing landing gear lacks a little more inclination.

    In the image below you can see that the beacon light is poorly located, well rather the flash.

    In the following images we see that here the real 747-400 aircraft has the Beacon Light of belly bread where I said:

    By the way, the Beacon Lights on both the belly and the roof do not reflect Its flash neither on the ground nor on the plane, which is what is missing as well.

    In short, as I said it is an aircraft that already needs to be updated in: New engine sounds, Apu, flaps, that is, as they did with the other aircraft and also more liveries.

  • SkyModz MD11F Development

    Quote from caiofirmo

    And it will release on mobile?I

    love this plane and I would like it to appear on mobiles

    But unfortunately the creator of this aircraft said that it can only be flown as long as they have the Aerofly FS 4 that is, PC.

    So it is almost nil that we will see this aircraft in Aerofly FS Global mobile version, unless ipacks develop it. And an airplane takes 6 months to a year to create from scratch.

  • I have a little problem with the Boeing 737.

    Hello virtual pilots of Aerofly FS Global.

    I have a problem with the 737 models: Boeing 737 Max9, 737-900er, 737-800, 737-500 classic.

    What happens is that when I fly normally, I take off and reach cruising altitude and begin to descend, everything happens normally.

    The problem occurs when I want the plane to land by itself using autoland.

    I have seen the virtual pilot tutorials on PC, obviously in another simulator, obviously with the same plane. I follow the steps they say and when I enter my simulator and when I fly or practice, It seems that the plane detects the glide path but does not start to descend automatically, instead I do the same procedure in the triple 7 both cargo and passengers, in the 747, in the 787 And everything works perfectly fine.

    How can I make the plane land by itself, by the way I don't mean activate the autopilot that makes the plane take off and land and make the whole flight without me doing anything, I mean To manipulate the autopilot yourself and make the plane land. How do I do it?

  • Ever find aerofly boring. Do the following

    You are right in what you say.

    My solution for making transatlantic or transcontinental flights of 10 or 12 hours and which I could recommend to players who want to make flights of this magnitude, It is to start the flight when they are already going to sleep, after 10 or 11 hours of flight depending on what time they get up in the morning, they would have more or less two hours maximum to reach their destination. This is what I do when I want to fly from Europe to America, from Europe to Asia for example:

    Zurich - Bangkok 11hours

    San Francisco - London 10 Hours

    Panama city - Amsterdam 10 Hours

    Etc😂

    By the way! I almost forgot! To prevent your phones from suffering during the attempt or during the flight, which will obviously overheat, I recommend purchasing a phone cooler.

    With a cooler like this your phone will hardly suffer at all since this model, which I have by the way, keeps the phone cool during my transoceanic or transcontinental flights of 10 or 12 hours.

  • New plane Lockheed TriStar

    Quote from Fab001

    It’s a very interesting aircraft and very revolutionary as well… but in a flight simulator I don’t really see a reason to add it. It doesn’t operate anymore in reallife and it’s quite unknown. Only a few people would actually fly this aircraft, same with the Concorde even tho these are magnificent pieces of engineering. Even its competitor would be a better option because of its notoriety, the DC11. It also still operates as a freighter.

    All in all tho, I’m not a fan of adding aircrafts that aren’t in service anymore or just very rare. The time costly development seems kinda wasted and there are much better alternatives apart of Boeing and Airbus… Aren’t you also waiting for Embraer, Gulfstream, Twin Otter, Pilatus or ATR to get finally added to Aerofly?

    It wouldn't be a bad idea to add the Lockheed L 10-11 tristar, The drawback that you will see is that it is an analog airplane in the sense of the cabin, that is to say like the 737-500, that is to say there are no liquid crystal screens, and it would be somewhat complicated to develop but not Impossible.

    I agree with what they say about McDonnell Douglas MD-11, It would be somewhat easier to develop since it has a liquid crystal display, and it's obviously an aircraft that more airlines have had.

    I also already told the developers that this would be one of the planes that I would like to see implemented or added to the simulator in the not too distant future.

  • Future Airports 3D Central America

    Greetings. Here's a 3D list of airports in Central America for future updates.

    Costa Rica:

    MRLB: Daniel Oduber Quirós International Airport

    MRPV Tobías Bolaños International Airport

    MROC Juan Santamaría International Airport

    Panamá:

    MPDA Enrique Malek International Airport

    MPTO Tocumen International Airport

    MPMG Marcos A Gelarbert Airport

    MPSM Scarlett Martínez International Airport

    MPEJ Enrique Adolfo Jiménez International Airport

    MPBO José Ezequiel Hall International Airport

    MPPA Panamá Pacífico International Airport

    Honduras:

    MHPR Palmerola International Airport

    El Salvador:

    MSLP San Óscar Arnulfo Romero y Galdámez International Airport

    Guatemala:

    MGGT La Aurora International Airport

    For now I would like to see these airports in 3D in a future update.

  • 737-800 What Happened

    Quote from Jet blast of A350 1000

    Hello Aerofly Users,as you may remember AFS made a behind the scenes video with the 737-800NG in it what happened did I miss something?Anyway I think this should be the next Aircraft

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.





    https://www.boeing.com/commercial/737ng

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_Next_Generation

    The one I show on the cover of the video and the model they have is a Boeing 737 Max 8. The one in the image you provided is an 800 Next Generation.

  • Free cam for mobile devices.

    Quote from Flyish

    So you’re telling me another mobile flight simulator, which is a pretty low quality one, managed to do something IPACS can’t? Doubt it.

    This might get deleted, but here’s the other mobile flight simulator. As you can see, they overlayed the free camera controls on top of the flight controls.

    https://youtu.be/hHjqoW_1UHI?si=1NrQmmN2IZQ-PRd0

    It's quite annoying that they're comparing simulators with very different philosophies. Aerofly FS Global and Infinity Flight are completely different simulators. Just because Infinity Flight has implemented tons of cameras and free camera doesn't mean it can be done in Aerofly FS Global as well. It all depends on various factors, depending on the graphics engine they're using, and it's obvious that the graphics engine Infinity Flight uses is very different from the one Aerofly FS Global uses. Only the developers will know when they'll be able to implement that camera, and if they say it's not possible for now, they'll know why. We should be grateful for having one of the best simulators on mobile.

    I'd also like that free camera, as it would allow you to record a video of aircraft spotting, but the developers haven't said anything about whether they'll implement it or not, and if they haven't, they have their reasons. The same goes for the taxi camera, which is used on the Airbus A380 and Airbus A350, which I'd like to use when taxiing to the runway or to the airport terminal gate. The developers have already given their reasons for not implementing it yet, as it would consume more resources.

    It's one thing to politely ask if there's any possibility of implementing a free camera, and that's acceptable. But to come and demand that developers implement something they can't yet implement or haven't said they'll implement on mobile devices, and even worse, to compare them with other simulators, that's out of order.

  • A350’s HUD

    Since the Airbus A350 came out, I didn't notice this until my last flight from Kumamoto to Shanghai. The HUD does flicker and looks a bit unstable.

    Although the Airbus A350's HUD flickers and is a bit unstable, it can be used, for example, at night for landing. If they fix that bug, it would be better. But the plane is incredible.