Posts by Juan507Antonio

  • 737-800 What Happened

    Quote from Jet blast of A350 1000

    Hello Aerofly Users,as you may remember AFS made a behind the scenes video with the 737-800NG in it what happened did I miss something?Anyway I think this should be the next Aircraft

    External Content www.youtube.com
    Content embedded from external sources will not be displayed without your consent.
    Through the activation of external content, you agree that personal data may be transferred to third party platforms. We have provided more information on this in our privacy policy.





    https://www.boeing.com/commercial/737ng

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_Next_Generation

    The one I show on the cover of the video and the model they have is a Boeing 737 Max 8. The one in the image you provided is an 800 Next Generation.

  • Free cam for mobile devices.

    Quote from Flyish

    So you’re telling me another mobile flight simulator, which is a pretty low quality one, managed to do something IPACS can’t? Doubt it.

    This might get deleted, but here’s the other mobile flight simulator. As you can see, they overlayed the free camera controls on top of the flight controls.

    https://youtu.be/hHjqoW_1UHI?si=1NrQmmN2IZQ-PRd0

    It's quite annoying that they're comparing simulators with very different philosophies. Aerofly FS Global and Infinity Flight are completely different simulators. Just because Infinity Flight has implemented tons of cameras and free camera doesn't mean it can be done in Aerofly FS Global as well. It all depends on various factors, depending on the graphics engine they're using, and it's obvious that the graphics engine Infinity Flight uses is very different from the one Aerofly FS Global uses. Only the developers will know when they'll be able to implement that camera, and if they say it's not possible for now, they'll know why. We should be grateful for having one of the best simulators on mobile.

    I'd also like that free camera, as it would allow you to record a video of aircraft spotting, but the developers haven't said anything about whether they'll implement it or not, and if they haven't, they have their reasons. The same goes for the taxi camera, which is used on the Airbus A380 and Airbus A350, which I'd like to use when taxiing to the runway or to the airport terminal gate. The developers have already given their reasons for not implementing it yet, as it would consume more resources.

    It's one thing to politely ask if there's any possibility of implementing a free camera, and that's acceptable. But to come and demand that developers implement something they can't yet implement or haven't said they'll implement on mobile devices, and even worse, to compare them with other simulators, that's out of order.

  • A350’s HUD

    Since the Airbus A350 came out, I didn't notice this until my last flight from Kumamoto to Shanghai. The HUD does flicker and looks a bit unstable.

    Although the Airbus A350's HUD flickers and is a bit unstable, it can be used, for example, at night for landing. If they fix that bug, it would be better. But the plane is incredible.

  • Bug fixes

    It seems so. And from what I'm seeing, it must be because I don't have an acceptable internet speed and the map is taking a while to load. Also, when it updates, I have to download all the planes again. Why do I have to download the planes again when there's a new update?

  • Bug fixes

    Hello Aerofly FS Global developers.

    In the latest update they released, I came to report this error on the ground.

    I am a beta tester and so that is the error I get in the field.

    The simulator performance is excellent, that's not the problem.

  • Frage an ipacs

    Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

    Wir haben auch beim A350 ein 3D Modell gekauft und haben am Ende dieses nicht verwendet sondern unser eigenes erstellt, damit die Qualität stimmt. Jedes komplexe Flugzeug kostet Monate an Arbeit. Eine 757 bringt wahrscheinlich nicht genug Neukunden, um den Preis für diese Arbeit zu rechtfertigen und nur eine Frachtversion schon erst Recht nicht. (Wir reden hier von Größenordnung wie Jahresgehälter mehrerer Personen). Wahrscheinlicher sind Frachtversionen von bestehenden Flugzeugen, siehe 777F.

    Hello Aerofly developers.

    I'm curious, and based on that curiosity, I have a question.

    Looking closely at the Boeing 737-500, I see that it is almost identical to the Boeing 737-200 Advance.

    Would it be possible to create the Boeing 737-200 Advance using the existing 737-500 as a base? I've been looking at it closely and I see that they are almost identical, only the engines are different. The 737-200 Advance uses JT8D engines, and the 500 uses CFM 56 engines.

    What I have noticed looking at photos is that the cockpit of the 500 is different from the 200 Advance, since the 500 has the first liquid crystal screens and the engine parameters I think are also different.


    Boeing 737-200 Advance

    Boeing 737-500

  • Frage an ipacs

    Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

    Wir haben auch beim A350 ein 3D Modell gekauft und haben am Ende dieses nicht verwendet sondern unser eigenes erstellt, damit die Qualität stimmt. Jedes komplexe Flugzeug kostet Monate an Arbeit. Eine 757 bringt wahrscheinlich nicht genug Neukunden, um den Preis für diese Arbeit zu rechtfertigen und nur eine Frachtversion schon erst Recht nicht. (Wir reden hier von Größenordnung wie Jahresgehälter mehrerer Personen). Wahrscheinlicher sind Frachtversionen von bestehenden Flugzeugen, siehe 777F.

    I completely agree, and I've said it several times before: an airplane isn't created overnight; it takes many months, depending on the quality the developer wants to offer. In my case, I'd like the McDonnels Douglas MD11, but it doesn't matter if it's an MD11, a Boeing 757, a 767, etc., an airplane isn't created overnight. While the developers are busy with the Airbus A350, we can calmly enjoy the planes already available. Let's wait calmly until the launch announcement. Only they will know when they're going to launch it.

  • can you add a md-11

    I would also like the MD11 in Aerofly FS Global in the future.

    As I've said time and again, an airplane isn't developed overnight; it takes from six months to almost a year, depending on the quality the developer wants to offer.

    I suggested the McDonnels Douglas MD11 because the remote-controlled version of Aerofly RC includes an MD11. But I've been told that to create it properly, they have to do it from scratch.

    The McDonnels Douglas MD11 is an improved version of the Douglas Commercial DC10.

    And it would be an excellent aircraft to add in the not-too-distant future.

  • Dogfight missions

    Quote from ThomK

    There are flight simulators and there are air combat games. This one is a flight simulator. If someone here wants IPACS to add a combat simulation, I'm against it. I don't want to see that here

    I agree with you: if you want something similar to a combat mission, create a flight plan and perform flights with extreme maneuvers. Now, if you want the simulator to have real or realistic combat missions, I don't think they'll implement that in the future. Besides, there are other simulators with that game mode. This is a flight simulator, not an air combat simulator.👋

  • More new airports not listed in the new update? (Developers please answer)

    There are new airports in Argentina, there are one or two in Peru, in Brazil there are a handful of airports too, in Colombia I haven't seen any, the airport in Mexico and another They are close and others a little further away, you just have to look for them.

    In short, there are several airports between Argentina, Peru, Brazil, and Mexico. You just have to search carefully, as they are scattered, and Have the updated simulator or the beta version.

    They already appear to me since I am obviously a beta tester.