Ok, there is an issue with the images on one of our servers, we will fix this as soon as possible.
I have the same problem as well.
Ok, there is an issue with the images on one of our servers, we will fix this as soon as possible.
I have the same problem as well.
A moving map on screen would be nice but I see no benefit in having the old shortcut button to just see the map full screen.
It seems like you don’t want to script it… Don’t get me wrong but this is really useful.
There are many cargo airlines that fly the 744 passenger variant. So it has the grand upper deck and you don’t have to model anything.
hello, I would like to ask if you were thinking to add multiplayer with a subscription of course to do the crazy stunts, and airshows like WT or infinite flight
Global subscription should include the multiplayer subscription.
As I am an iOS User my only sources are Videos to get to know anything about the new version. All aroundbthe globe, there are 3d buildings especially near the airport but I noticed that these 3d buildings are all the same… For example in San Fransisco there aren’t the famous skyscrapers anymore. Instead, there are copy and pasted skycrapers. So the sights are missing. Why is that so? Performance? Or does it look weird? I’d love to see the 3d buildings of AF2023 mixed with the new copy and paste buildings. Because it’s a shame for VFR e. g.
Dear IPACS,
Is it possible to spend that time needed for making airports by you around the wolrd, instead to make a SDK to submit airports made by users with already existing 3d strutures, and finally you coud approve those airports ? It wound be better way and much faster tho
A map editor on pc (at least) for the mobile aerofly version (fs global) would be need, indeed. The same goes for liveries. Like free developing in general which has to be approved by Ipacs so the quality remains on a high level and it won’t be displayed as third party.
From toilets, I imagined the inside of a plane, and from that, I imagined the cabin...
So can IPACS add a cabin view?
It's like the window view, but when you turn around, you cam see the cabin.
The cabin will only be rendered when the view is selected, saving performance.
Actually, I’d love to see a camera view out of a window. You don’t have to be able to look around. Just looking out a window instead of looking out of nothing would be such an improvement to the realism.
The drop tanks under the wing were removed, yes. We added physics to them and they caused drag, just like in the real world. So in order to make the plane fly faster we had to "drop" them.
Once again I’d love to see different variants of planes in aerofly: like you can choose if you want to fly the a320 with or without the sharklets or if you would want to fly the f15 with or without. These small differences don’t take a lot of effort especially if they were already ingame.
P.C. Aerofly FS Aare river.
What about a low resolution outer coast line for easier storage and strongly gradient blur the transition from existing shore line texture to a new more realistic directional deep water texture? It could also be patchy to simulate broken cloud between the sun and the water reflection location, that could save more storage. It need not take into account the selected sim cloud cover as the lighting actions would take place many miles away. A sort of autogen could define the patches of reflective deep water.
Lakes and reservoirs being quite small could have more detailed textured water without a big storage penalty. The largest rivers could have intermittent occasional texture as if under broken cloud. The river Aare west of Zurich in P.C. FS has a stretch of that.
I can’t be the only one that actually prefers the satellite water.
Can aerofly say what the state of things is,
We can't wait any longer for iOS.
Only the AppStore itself could tell us. They approve the game there’s nothing Aerofly can do right now. That’s why they don’t tell us any specific date. It was the same with Aerofly FS2023.
nah i think its more likely edited in
Most likely yeah, pretty weird tho since this guy isn’t editing his videos.
I watched a few videos of a specific YouTuber and in his videos there were like radio communication sounds in the 737. I wonder if that’s a thing?
(Minute 07:12 as an example)
I would ask for the E190 (with KLM, Helvetic, BA Cityflyer, Airfrance, SAS, and Azul liveries)
I cant repeat myself that often but WE NEED BINTER CANARIAS. And I’d like to see another turboprop. My on top wish is the ATR-72-600.
I hope it's done soon.
Does data cache after 1 flight? So if I fly from EHAM-LSGG, can I fly that route offline later?
I hope this data cache doesn’t affect my storage too much. Like I don’t wanna imagine how much GB it saves after flying 5 different long haul routes for around 10 hours… I hope it deletes itself after reaching a specific maximum.
good evening ipacs team Spain is one of the countries with the most flights in the world, could you add your two flag airlines, Iberia and Vueling please... to make countless flights from Spain to the whole world and also Rynair although it is not from Spain it is an iconic airline of the 737
Everything except Ryanair. Ryanair doesn’t operate the 739. They only operate the 738 and one 737 for vip flights (which is quite crazy).
I keep refreshing the page for it to be released lmao
You are not the only one
A330 is better in my opinion
Same, and it’s most likely easier as well since it shares many technical systems the a320 has.
why lesson bro? could you answer
He means that it’s a lesson to the other flight sims that they are too overpriced and their value is way less than AF.
Hamburg Finkenwerder,EDHI, Tower is missing.
By the way, are all 3d modeled airports of AF2023 in FS Global?
uh okay. hate to break it to you, but i aint from that side of the pond. also appreciate you relaxing on the sarcasm a bit.
thanks
All day every day