It’s not out for iOS
Generally speaking, iOS updates are slower because they need to pass Apple's review.
Posts by FlyOverAsia
-
-
i can't fly a350
same problem, i try restart the game still same problem
I have the same problem
Same problem here…. Wtf?
Update the Aerofly to v01.05.01.08. The problem is solved.
-
This problem has now been fixed in a recent update, v01.05.01.03. The APU is able to supply power normally. The engine can be started.
-
I have updated to version 01.05.01.02. When I was relearning the A380, I found that my APU could not reach the "Avail" state. In my impression, N1 should reach 100 (In AFS2023), but now it is stuck at 95. I looked through some other video tutorials. But I still don't know what the problem is. Hope someone can help me.
-
Thanks for pointing this out. We will look into this issue, it's likely a fault on our side with the airport files itself.
There seem to be many airports around the world with this problem. Some airports have raised areas around them (Or the airport is sunk in the ground). Some airports have raised areas between their runways and taxiways.
For example: ZPPP
-
Yes. We now have challenges in a dedicated menu and you can fly these challenges and complete them.
But I found a problem. In the challenge "Park Visual Approach", if we follow the flight guide, we will crash into the mountain. Also, I think the A319 is a better choice here than the A320.
-
Alright, thanks for the feedback.
And to our beta testers: How are the new challenges working for you?
"New mission"? Can I understand it as the "challenge" content of the new update? If so, I think it's a great feature that would allow us to discover more interesting places on the map.
-
Ok, I could reproduce this problem.
Content moved to "Conversation"...
-
the log file you attached in your previous post was generated by Aerofly FS 4 content converter not Aerofly FS 2 content converter, you must install Aerofly FS 2 content converter version. You can download it from here: https://www.aerofly-sim.de/aerofly_fs_2_sdk
There still seems to be a problem
-
First, you have to use the Aerofly FS 2 converter not FS 4.
And did you put all the textures into the folder?
Yes, I put all the textures in. I used the converter you provided (https://www.aerofly.com/community/inde…entconvert-zip/) .
-
Tutorial: How to make the tgi-file and tmb and ttx-files for Aerofly models
Sorry to bother you, I encountered a problem when using converter to convert TGI files. This is the error report. Do you know how to solve it? Thank you!
-
Really exciting! Can't wait to fly the plateau route! It must be amazing to fly among the white snowy mountains.，
-
Tutorial: How to make the tgi-file and tmb and ttx-files for Aerofly models
Great! I think I have regained confidence in creating some buildings for Aerofly FS.
-
Oh no, so my 1h 47min from Innsbruck to Farrenberg doesn't count then?
And I assume only flights in Aerofly FS count, right? hahahaHope to see you upload your glider flying video on YouTube, it is much more interesting than in the Aerofly FS! It is also a very useful tutorial!
-
I can (unfortunately) only design airports and sceneries for FS 4, i.e. the PC version. I don't know to what extent it is possible to transfer them to the mobile versions. I think that there is a user who can do a lot for Android devices. For iOS devices, as far as I know, this is only possible through IPACS.
I can move the part that depends on Aerofly FS generic model library to Android/IOS. Just give me the tap. For Android, I have tutorials for installing the final files, but I don't use iOS and need someone else to edit the tutorials. For the other models, I think IPACS is needed because they don't provide any tools. We will just generate wrong files.
-
As we mentioned before, we intend to update our navigation database and we never said we will go only for a specific solution neither did we say we will discard other ones. But it's not a matter that can be decided right away, it requires careful planning and we want to ensure we reach as many users as possible.
Thank you for your reply. As you can see, many users want you to update the navigation data. I think this might be a valuable reply.
But there also a question and suggestion:
On the maps in the game interface "Locations" and "Navigation", the display of airports seems to rely on navigation data. If the ICAO code of an old airport is used by a new airport, the new and old airports will be displayed on the map. But in fact there is only one of the airports, the other is nothingness. From this I speculate that on that map, the navigation data will provide the airport's runway and location information. But if the navigation data is wrong, the airport display will also be wrong. Can something be done to improve this problem? If it's difficult, just pretend I didn't say it.
A txt file about Aerofly FS Global has been sent to your email, please check it, thank you for your hard work.
-
As I tried to explain, Navigraph is not a solution for all our users because it leaves 95% of all customers behind and would also drive up cost significantly.
But Aerofly FS is obviously lagging behind in terms of navigation data. And according to my observation, the positioning of the airport on the map in the "Location" and "Navigation" interfaces in the game does not only rely on the runway data in the airport file. It also relies on navigation data. Navigation data also appears to provide some information about the airport. This results in that if the ICAO code of an old airport is used by a new airport, the new and old airports will be displayed on the map. But in fact there is only one of the airports, the other is nothingness. This is indeed an aspect that needs to be addressed.
-
Please read these posts I made here which contain valuable information on how to definitively resolve the Aerofly's outdated airac problem. You will understand in a simple and practical way how Navigraph support works. FlyOverAsia
okay, thank you.
-
That's not what I said.
We still need to find a navigation database that we can purchase that doesn't cost us millions and raises the app price by 100$...
The rest of the process is somewhat easy, we already did all that with our current database so the process is already known.I see. Where did you get your navigation data before? Because Aerofly FS now has real navigation data from previous versions.
-
I think you still don't quite understand. We need to do the process anyway. So why should we add additional work for us to enable you to work do the same but with extra hurdles? Renewing the database is only possible if it is affordable and accessible.
You will do the work. That's the best. Because you have been putting off dealing with the navigation data issue until now. As before, basic functions are worth paying more attention to than more flashy aircraft.
