Posts by Beto McFly

    Olá @ipacs, atualizei recentemente meu dispositivo do android 11 para o android 12 one ui4.1 e tenho enfrentado alguns problemas com o aerofly, como tremulação ao fazer panning no cockpit e na visão externa. O fps cai significativamente de 50-60 para abaixo de 10 em menos de um minuto após o lançamento de um voo quando a temperatura do telefone não está nem acima de 40°C (não é um problema de limitação térmica). Esse problema ocorre apenas no aerofly, todos os meus outros jogos estão funcionando sem problemas. Estou no programa beta executando o aerofly versão 20.23.01.38 e meu telefone é uma variante samsung s10 g973f exynos. Obrigado

    This problem is probably due to weak hardware on your device or an outdated operating system that is not reading the simulator correctly. For example here on my Samsung Galaxy S20 FE the simulator is running normally with FPS variations for more or less depending on the scenario since I run with the graphics at maximum and pixel density at 100%. Remembering that the fluidity of a flight simulator like Aerofly depends a lot on the quality of the smartphone's hardware. It's not the same as running other games. Flight simulators and games are two completely different things and it is not possible to draw an ideal performance comparison between the two.

    And you think developers work for free? Do you think satellite images are free? And are 3D modeling programs free? Only in your airhead to think that developers don't need resources to work on the simulator.

    The LNAV (lateral navigation) and VNAV (vertical navigation) that are functions of the aircraft's autopilot need information regarding the departure, arrival and approach procedures to function correctly. In this case, your plane started flying aimlessly because it did not have information for the LNAV to correctly guide the aircraft on its path between the airport of origin and the destination. With the information entered correctly in the FMC, the LNAV function will guide the aircraft to the destination. VNAV, on the other hand, needs information regarding the approach, as this function creates a vertical descent path (glide ramp). The VNAV function will act both in an RNAV and ILS approach.

    Acho que esse deve ser o verdadeiro motivo desse problema, obrigado por me ajudar 👍

    The problem with your plane flying aimlessly and getting lost on the way was due to the fact that you made mistakes in planning the flight from the departure phase through the arrival and approach. In the navigation menu, no departure, arrival, approach procedure is shown, in addition to not having any waypoints along the trajectory of the aircraft. Without this essential information for the flight, you will easily get lost. So this is not a bug.

    [attach='36099','nenhum','falso'][/attach]

    This flight plan is invalid because you have not selected any departure, arrival and approach procedures and you have not added any waypoints along the route. You have only selected your takeoff and landing runway. Without selecting any departure, arrival and approach procedures, the plane will fly adrift and without any direction. For this reason, your plane does not follow the correct path between the origin and destination airports.

    The correct thing would be for these two functions (VS and APP) to appear turned off when we place the aircraft in the final approach position for landing. I did the same test on the Boeing 787-10 and these two functions appear turned off in the MCP of that aircraft.

    I did some tests here and indeed the VS of the A320, Boeing 777 and 747 planes appears with a descent rate of -500 and with the approach function activated. But, even with these functions activated, they are not capable of interfering with the behavior of the aircraft when you place it in the landing position, since the autopilot appears off. With this, you can only control the aircraft manually without the VS and approach functions having interference since the autopilot is turned off. The only thing you have to do, in addition to controlling the aircraft manually until landing, is to turn off the autothrottle function to control the throttle stick manually. Despite that, I don't remember if the VS function (-500) and approach were already turned on before this last update in these three aircraft in case of putting them in a direct approach position for landing. As for changing the position of the flight controls on the screen, I didn't have any problems with this since they no longer obstruct the front camera lens of my Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G device.

    I see no need for more planes for the Aerofly fleet. From Airbus we already have the A320 and the A380. In addition, we have two models of the Boeing 737 that are on the way. But I would make an exception to add at least one more Airbus model. It could be the A330 or A350. With the A330 or the A350 being inserted in Aerofly, the aircraft fleet would be closed with a golden key.

    I don't understand why this problem is happening to you. Here for me the throttle lever normally obeys the braking commands when I give reverse thrust. I can apply as much reverse thrust as I want and the lever won't go back to idle.

    Lembro que também tenho um Galaxy S20 FE e que tenho esse problema o tempo todo

    Here on my device, I didn't find anything wrong with the aircraft's braking system or with the accelerator bar. After landing I can pull down normally without having to apply 100% thrust from the reverses.

    Em si, pode não ser um problema, mas pelo menos são algumas coisas que existem para alguns usuários. Todos nós usamos dispositivos diferentes aqui, então não é porque você não tem esse problema, é o mesmo em todos os lugares.

    His device is the same as mine, namely a Samsung Galaxy S20 FE. The difference is that my colleague's device is 4G while mine is 5G.

    Oi, pessoal! Quando freio com o acelerador, os freios voltam automaticamente para 0%. Este bug é muito perturbador. Já vi outras pessoas com esses problemas.

    This problem does not occur on my device. I can adjust the reverse thrust freely without lowering the throttle bar to 100%. In a test I was able to make the aircraft brake completely with only 37% of reverse thrust. In another test I was able to brake in the same way with 67% reverse thrust. When activating the reverses in the two tests using 37% and 67% of thrust the lever in no time escaped my thumb and did not return to the idle position. In my opinion, your claim is unfounded.

    This problem does not occur on my device. I can adjust the reverse thrust freely without lowering the throttle bar to 100%. In a test I was able to make the aircraft brake completely with only 37% of reverse thrust. In another test I was able to brake in the same way with 67% reverse thrust. When activating the reverses in the two tests using 37% and 67% of thrust the lever in no time escaped my thumb and did not return to the idle position. In my opinion, your claim is unfounded.

    Existem planos para adicionar uma pequena quantidade de árvores e grama (arbusto) no simulador?


    Talvez algumas árvores 2D e grama em uma área de aeroportos de 1 km × 1 km.


    A configuração pode ser ativada ou desativada para desempenho (e essas adições não são tão pesadas em telefones celulares).

    I see this as unnecessary at the moment as there are more important things for developers to work on like the new Boeing 737 and the pushback. Inserting vegetation in the scenarios in the simulator can consume many frames, which will certainly generate complaints among users.