The 7000 airports globally were developed with an algorithm and we can just expand this code to add mode features for all airports at once. Of course we may also cherry pick a few airports and manually design highly detailed buildings and more.
Can you add Lukla airport to Aerofly please? Thanks.
1) yes youre 98% right i still dont know what the hell im doing with the new 737
2) i got a dev response already, your entire post there was totally unnecessary. i see your overprotective attitude towards the sim still hasn't gone yet.
edit: get up to 35,000, set 267 knots indicated on the MCP, then stick it in the CRZ thrust/N1 limit and tell me if the airspeed starts bleeding back.
I defend what is right. As I mentioned in the previous answer I did a complete flight on the 737-900ER and didn't encounter any bugs. I support the sim because I see that the developers' work is great. Of course, there is nothing perfect in this life and there are flaws. Despite this, the simulator will be better worked on over the months as guaranteed by the developers.
None of the airports in this area of the map have parking gates or cold and dark, and some of them look wrong.
Doesn't the eastern part of the map belong to the world? I bought this version again so that I could fly in these regions. If I didn't I would still have Aerofly 2023 installed instead. And you want to get paid for this every month, right?
Fuel and cargo loading for aircraft are included in all simulations. What kind of separation do you have?
Do you think it is easy to work in each of the more than 7 thousand airports that exist in Aerofly FS Global? This is something that takes time and money. It is not something that can be done overnight given the high workload of adding 3D terminals and general aviation hangars at airports that are incomplete. Be patient as the developers have already clarified that they will gradually add terminals to these airports.
okay so i appreciate that weight and balance is a big thing to implement, but that means that every aircraft is programmed to handle a certain way. yesterday i took the new 737 out, 33,000 feet, in the CRZ thrust limit, and while it did take a lot longer to climb, it seemed happy at altitude. no idea if i'm doing something wrong, but at flight level 350, 267 knots indicated (M.785) in the CRZ thrust detent, the speed just gradually creeps back, like it's too heavy to sustain flight at altitude. have to leave it in CLB 1 to keep my speed or else it will eventually stall out. same for the 747; anything over 35 or 36,000 it seems too heavy to be able to cope with the altitude. 35,000 shouldnt be a big ask for the 739 but it seems with this one that it is. is it because i upped the V/S just beforehand just to get it to climb quicker and didnt climb slower like i did before?
what kind of altitudes and speeds do you guys cruise at with it? do you ever touch the thrust limits once it's in cruise or leave it in CLB, CLB 1, etc
Edit: the autobrakes on the 739 dont seem to automatically disable from RTO after takeoff as well unlike every other Boeing in the sim
This allegation is unfounded. I just took a flight on the Boeing 737-900ER and everything went smoothly without any problems. You are probably making mistakes when piloting the aircraft. There's nothing wrong with the plane. There is no bug that could compromise the flight on the 737-900ER.
Display MoreDear Jet-Pack (IPACS),
as you may have noticed right now I am doing many flights with the learjet 45 for my so called Project Earth.
I experienced two bugs during my flights so far:
1. The navigation display for longer distances to the next waypoint it shows the wrong arrival time. The hours are missing, it only shows the minutes so if you do longer flights you have no clue how many hours are left to the next waypoint.
And second of all, the distance to the next waypoint when it’s far away it gets displayed above the NM sign.
2. If you are on flaps 8 and you want to put them in flaps 0 by using the buttons it doesn’t work. It only works in the cockpit manually.
These three bugs you mentioned also occur to me when I fly on the Learjet.
In the past, when simulating on X-Plane mobile, I used Navigraph support a lot to update airac. In the case of X-Plane mobile, this support was paid for by the users themselves. As far as I know, the developers of X-Plane mobile did not pay for the airac update with Navigraph. The monthly cost of the Navigraph subscription is not very high these days.
Unfortunately a new navigation database is too expensive currently. The database we currently use was at an acceptable price back then. Nowadays the prices are too high for a completely new database but we will keep looking for an affordable option. Keep in mind we need to be able to redistribute this database, modify it and it needs to run offline without any additional user account from a third party software.
What about Navigraph support? This would be the best way to solve this outdated airac problem. Those who would pay for the monthly or annual subscription to update airac would be the users themselves. Or would IPACS have to pay Navigraph just to bring it to Aerofly? How does this issue work?
Merry Christmas devs! Whenever you are all back from the holidays, can you add a lock to horizon slider for the cockpit cameras? That will add so much more to the realistic factor!
Is the IPACS team on vacation? I wasn't aware of that.
Me too. Specially Lukla. That's second first thing I checked after looking at the new plane.
It would be good to have it. A lot or fun taking off and landing there with different planes.
Just like you, I really want to see Lukla airport in this new Aerofly.
I was preparing for a flight on the Boeing 747-400 when I noticed several overhead switches with a strange light gray texture that gave the impression of being transparent. Previously, these switches had a light brown color that is predominant throughout the aircraft cockpit. I ask that you please return the previous texture of these switches as it is exactly the one that matches the real aircraft. I'm avoiding some screenshots that show the switches in a color that doesn't match reality.
I also noticed this strange color on the switches on the Boeing 787 and 777👇🏽👇🏽
In this other screenshot we see the true color of the Boeing 747-400 overhead switches on the Aerofly FS 2023. I'm not sure but it appears to be a dark brown color👇🏽👇🏽
???
I meant he's AustinBug's son. That's why he doesn't know how to interpret a text. Note: don't ask me who AustinBug is😂😂😂
The two games use completely different game engines, and can you really not see the modeling quality of xplane? ? ? Are the two comparable? If aerofly had used the same rendering engine as xplane, the lighting problem would have been solved more than 4 years ago
Firstly, X-Plane mobile and Aerofly are flight simulators and not games. Secondly, I'm talking about Navigraph support (airac update) and not the graphical quality of the two simulators. You will learn to interpret a text by your son from Austin Bug.
Loading all waypoints and data at once would already be more than most iOS devices can handle. That's why only some tiles are loaded and not the whole world. But of course we can perhaps add some database lookup request which doesn't need to load all data at the same time.
My cell phone is Android. Citing another simulator as an example, X-Plane mobile has a Boeing 737 that carries all the waypoints and airways around the world in the FMC, whether short or long routes. Not only on this 737, but all aircraft have FMC/GPS that carry any waypoint in the world's airspace. In addition, Navigraph support is present, making it possible to update airac and the FMC and aircraft GPS database. And this Navigraph support has little impact on the memory footprint of devices, whether iOS or Android.
At the moment only waypoints in the nearby loaded tiles can be inserted in the FMC. This is a limitation of the route and unfortunately I do not have access to the code to fix it, we'll have to wait for the route developer to fix this.
If you see the waypoint on the navigation display you should be able to insert it as well.
I have two suggestions for a solution to this problem: one is to integrate all global map waypoints into the FMC or bring Navigraph support to the simulator. Speaking of Navigraph, are there any plans by the team to bring it to Aerofly? In this case, users would be responsible for paying the subscription for this support for the airac update, which is largely outdated. Several procedures are at odds with air navigation charts.
At the moment only waypoints in the nearby loaded tiles can be inserted in the FMC. This is a limitation of the route and unfortunately I do not have access to the code to fix it, we'll have to wait for the route developer to fix this.
If you see the waypoint on the navigation display you should be able to insert it as well.
When this failure occurs I can only insert the waypoint in the navigation menu. I hope you can fix this bug as soon as possible. Thank you for your clarification.
this problem also occurs on my device.
The FMC database does not match what is in the navigation menu. Several waypoints are missing. I try to insert a certain waypoint and it always gives an error in the FMC. I simply cannot load a complete route directly into FMC without an error appearing. This occurs since Aerofly 2022.
I discovered a flaw in the FMC. Several waypoints simply won't load. Initially the FMC even loads some waypoints but then an error message (format error) appears when I try to insert some more waypoints. There appears to be a disconnect between the FMC database and the fixes on the global map. To get around this error, I go back to the navigation menu and insert the missing waypoints of the route I want to take between airport A and B.
Hello developers, I'm wondering why the Lukla, Saba, and St. Barts airports are not in the global? Maybe you guys are working on hand modeling them😉. I would just like to see them soon. Thanks.
Just like you, I also really want to see these airports on Aerofly FS Global.
I've seen it and there were no interruptions and it was the same on the last flight
Another situation that may have occurred is the following: the Boeing 737-500 does not fly by RNAV but only by VOR and NDB. It is an aircraft of old design, incorporating almost none of the navigation that more modern aircraft use. As you selected an RNAV approach, your aircraft ended up leaving the route due to not having the appropriate instruments for this type of navigation. To resolve any doubts, I suggest you take this same route with the RNAV approach on the Boeing 777, 737-900ER, 787 or 747 as these are aircraft that can easily fly via RNAV. When your aircraft is on final approach, check whether it will leave the route just like the 737-500.
When I selected the RNAV approach procedure in the navigation menu and used vertical navigation for the final approach, the aircraft lost navigation in the last 1 nautical mile or so and went seriously off course. The previous flight was scheduled to land at Dubai Airport but veered to the left. This time, the plane veered to the right as it landed at Princess Juliana International Airport
You have to check if there are any discontinuities on your route. Because, if there is, your aircraft will no longer follow the route previously created in the navigation menu and will start flying aimlessly. Do you have any screenshots that show your complete route to Dubai? In the navigation menu you can see if there is any discontinuity in the route.
