Posts by BoeingIFY_8

Quote from Criticalairline

Since I’m experiencing performance issues with Aerofly FS on my iPad 2022 (4 GB RAM), I wanted to ask for your advice.

Which iPad model would you recommend to get the best possible performance, smooth experience, and full 3D buildings in the simulator — including clouds, lights, and complex aircraft like the A350 — without any lag?

Thank you in advance for your help!

Best regards

11th gen if you are tight in budget. after all, my budget iPad 8 gen still runs better without any issues only issues I have is in high airport density areas where it randomly crashes (understandable since it’s 3gb ram). I’m going to change to A16 in the coming months (more or less performs similar to IPhone 15.)

If you have more bucks to buy, go for (iPad Air M series ). M3/M2 is smth like pc should never disappoint your choice.

Quote from 777Driver

Understood. But it still appears when flying manually FD's on at 50ft, am wondering what the FD's are commanding. I'll bury my head in the fcom for a bit. Thanks for your help.

Same, but I get what IPACS said.

Actually, the A320s flare at 30ft but at first i thought to flare when fcom says to flare.

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

No this is modeled accurately. The flare mode engages at 50ft and then starts with the flare at around 30-20ft. You can look at the flight director guidance if you want but it's not recommended to use it for manual landings. Your eyes should be outside at that point.

Oh I see, I got confused with the toliss showing on 30ft in it’s fcom. (Manual landing)

Hello everyone,

Why is the flare in A320 saying to initiate at 50ft? Irl the flare (according to the airbus manual) it says to initiate at 30ft.

But, in Aerofly’s A320, the FCOM is saying to do it at 50ft.

Is it a bug?

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

Engine view

Will we get the realistic XWB sounds? Or is it planned for the future?

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

The hydraulic system in the A320 is experimental and might be ripped out completely and be replaced with something different entirely. Doing the same for more aircraft than just the A320 family would be a waste of time right now. It's on the list for future expansions but not just for one aircraft, we need a solution for hydraulics that works on all aircraft.

So will we have realistic hydraulics in the future? For every aircrafts like a350,a320 and others?

Will we have realistic IRS aligning time at least in the A350?

Or, is it planned for the future?

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

This is what the A350 front panel currently looks like in the developer build. There are a lot of new features shown here and I hope we can include all of them in the initial release but keep in mind that they are work in progress. Some things like the rendering of the airport tarmacs on the map may not be included in the initial release.

So, that airport maps spawns after touchdown? Or is it going To be static?

你能说英文吗？

Your spec?

For me it’s working well being a 8gen ipad user

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

Finally some teaser screenshots from inside the flightdeck of the A350 in Aerofly FS!

Looks promising, can’t wait for the release

will it have airport maps? Like I mean this: (my personal favourite feature in airbus)

It appears after touchdown in real life.

Quote from VolerSuisse333

The 787-8 has fewer flap positions, so some cockpit elements would need to be reworked.

Really? Don’t they look the same?

Edit: yes I can see their differences in numbers. The 9 and 10 seems to be the same but, why is 8 different? It’s because for better takeoff performance?

Quote from ThomK

Maybe IPACS removed the moon to improve performance. Personally, it annoys me that things we already had are secretly removed again, just like the taxi light

What does moon have to do with performance?

I can agree for buildings, aircraft and texture quality. But, what does it do for performance issues?

Quote from ZK Aviation

No it was definitely bigger that 2023's version

Mm i think it should be a little bit larger. But anyways it looks good

But, why does it look like lunar eclipse?. I’ve noticed that moon colour looks a bit reddish.

Quote from A330NEO

After the A350 releases we will have a chance to those 5 aircraft! Now please be patient!

Maybe 737-800, max 8, 787-8,9 or why not 747-8? My fav Boeing 747.

And yes, it does have similar cockpit as the 747-400. I don’t think e2 or A220 will be coming in the next update. They need to make it from scratch.

One possibility for Airbus would be - NEO.

Quote from ZK Aviation

...and the moon

It’s same after the update. Maybe we need a new reworked skies so we can see the realistic moon.

If I remember the default moon in af looks a bit small and dull.

Quote from admin

We are currently sending a new beta version ( Version 1.4.15 ) to Apple for you to test. It should be available within the next 24h. The link to install the beta version is here.

Please note: Ensure before testing, that it's version 1.4.15 and not the previous one 1.4.14.

iPad 8th gen, city lights are back!

Thanks for the fix but, why is the moon missing?

Quote from Hellomyaviator

Hi, are there any news concerning the missing Airport/ city lights?

No, I miss those beautiful looking lights

Quote from AHD

Is it possible to add a replay mode where we can replay the whole flight not just a few minutes?

Maybe possible for PC but, not for mobile. Because, mobile can’t render most of the things in replay or it will end up crashing the game.

Quote from eliozo

UPDATE

Our A330 is now a flying aircraft in Aerofly.

Teaser:

Hope to see them in the future. Looks great.