Posts by BoeingIFY_8

  • Why the E190 would be awesome on mobile

    Most importantly than airplanes and others there’s some things I’ve noticed Aerofly FS could attract more users rather than just a “profit” word:


    Many people asked about VATSIM compatibility from outside Aerofly community

    Real weather (I personally like how the fog is kinda like semi real in Aerofly than other sims like x plane which gets too foggy for 5-6km visibility approaches. They should also implement volumetric clouds (at least for PC) and also rain effects, snow and heat effects (if possible for mobile)

    And of course, Skycolors which look good but, it looks a bit outdated to today’s standards

    Better roads and railways (in night it kinda gives more natural irl feeling but, if Aerofly can add roads and rails (at least for the PC version) imagine, it would surpass many sims away

    Immersion packs : (what I mean is that, giving existing aircrafts to match like irl procedures. You can add even a fee for this as I understand, getting a a320 for example to work like IRL takes more time and money to do it. But, would be worth if they can add “Study Level” Immersion packs for A320, 737 at first, then go with A350s and 777s,787s.)

    Better Water (I feel the water is just copied from the Map source. It would be good if it’s done some alterations with correct boundaries for each region to stimulate beaches and waves)


    Touchdown smoke (at least for the PC)


    So, there are many things just if I remember somewhere IPACS even said that (they got lots of things to do before even if we can see Aerofly FS 5). It’s not just aircrafts which could make the aim profitable , it’s the overall content that Aerofly can deliver for the users.

  • Why the E190 would be awesome on mobile

    Quote from Tomfa

    Everyone has their own point of view on aviation; perhaps we're not of the same generation? ;)

    Regarding the Me262, it's an extraordinary model and one that fascinates me greatly. I rather think it would have been profitable if it had been sold.

    Because currently, no simulator offers it for free, or rather yes, if you want a cloned model, MSFS20 offers one. However, it's nothing like this model here, which has such realism, and I've always been fascinated by the smallest details.

    However, I find that we're missing a lot of older models, if we're talking only about commercial jet models, such as old Briscares, Comet, Caravelle, B727 or -707, then Coronado, DC-8, DC-9, and even DC-10. These are some older generation models that fascinated me, and personally, I think that it would be much more profitable in the long run than this new generation of aircraft that all look the same, and which, basically, are no longer pure programming models. It's getting monotonous.

    However, I know that we have to move with the times, but it's a rather nostalgic choice.

    Please include also A300 and A310. Why people hate A300s so badly? Was it a wrong plane made by Airbus?

    To me, it’s something that should have been flying instead of XLRs and LRs in A321 (I’d it would had got neo).

  • Airbus A321 Flare Logic

    Hello Everyone,


    I’ve noticed that, the A321 in Aerofly while flaring goes upto degree 5 pitch but, when I demonstrate this in a stimulator it’s floating when I flare after 30 ft slowly to 5 degrees (perhaps, it works when I flare to pitch 3). Can anyone explain me whether the flare in Aerofly’s A321 is going according to real A321 logic or is it using the A320 one?

    I didn’t have issues landing A320, A350. They were able to pitch upto pitch 5 for smooth landing. But, when I do this in Aerofly it does work but, I don’t Think it’s stimulated realistic for A321. Or can I get some help regarding this bird? I’m totally confused.

  • SkyModz MD11F Development

    Wow! Slowly Aerofly is getting more attention for making new 3rd party aircrafts. Good luck!!

    One wish i have: can you make Airbus A300-600 after MD-11? (Just asking as, this is the backbone for airbus success and also, many airlines who are operating A330s have owned this majesty previously and the A310. NGL, it also does a rocket climb due to its engines.)

  • A330 thread #7

    Quote from fares

    so I did post a thread regarding the a333 yesterday , yet jetpack did indeed almost trash it so

    although I know that the message was clear regarding the fact that the a330 wasn't in development currently, we need at least to know

    when would we expect the development to start, cause I feel that its a bit odd to say that areofly won't be updating new aircrafts anymore

    So, please jet-pack, feel free to discuss the issue with us, inorder for all of us to be aware of all future plans

    and, thanks in advance

    Firstly, I don’t think a330 needs to be developed from IPACS for a while. Since, there is someone who is already making a A333 for FS4 (probably, since he mentioned it’s not for mobile at the first)

    Secondly, do you realise making aircraft isn’t easier? If you cannot understand, go look at x plane 12 how much time those devs take to make a study level aircrafts for that sim. The same amount of time is used by IPACS to build new aircrafts (IPACS seem to be actually faster than those x plane snail payware devs like FF) in my opinion

    Be patient and you will get great new contents/ aircrafts for Aerofly in the future. Another thing, just because devs are reluctant to reply about the specified aircraft doesn’t mean they won’t make that. Capt Boeing please stop assuming Things incorrectly. They would add in the future depending on the aircraft poll. how did a350 came to IPACS attention for the next aircraft? It’s because it got lots of votes somewhere in some poll which was already created long time ago.

    Until we wait for new aircrafts, why don’t we enjoy with the existing ones? We still have a lot Aerofly fs 4/ mobile needs to be improved to come at least to the level of x plane. (Apologies if I’m bringing other sims here.) we need

    - new graphics ( newly natural looking sky colours ( default ones look dated and fsxish)

    - Immersion packs. (If possible IPACS can make for a320,777,787 which would come as a true study level for pc ) my opinion

    - better aerial detailed water (around the globe)

    - better touchdown physics

    - need new more 3D real life airports (which I believe IPACS is developing behind the scenes for each updates.. I personally like their approach on implementing these irl looking airports through streaming tech instead of downloading all which would make our storage burst in pc and it won’t be possible in mobile)

    - crash animations ( or maybe failures would be better than crash animations as they take more resources in mobile to stimulate them)

    So, yes we have more things that Aerofly yet to implement to make it stand at its place of competition. Let’s just leave the remaining to the dev. I understand being here for 6 yrs in Aerofly community how IPACS develops all aircrafts as they take time to make perfect aircrafts like a350, which for me looked miles better than FF a359 which, looks clunky to fly in XP 12.

  • Inaccurate papi lights?

    Quote from nofuelwx

    hey all, i was casually landing a 737-800 when i found the papi lights to (imo) be extremely innacurate. is this really too high..? not even one red? or am i actually too high..

    screenshot was taken at 69 feet (nice) ground altitude.

    You must focus papi as a reference not as your ideal touchdown area. After 200ft, focus those large 2 bars to touchdown on or after those bars.

    I usually do that after 200ft. I aim at landing at those big white bars. That’s how my landings are successful in recent times.

  • Development Teaser: A350 work in progress

    Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

    The hydraulic system in the A320 is experimental and might be ripped out completely and be replaced with something different entirely. Doing the same for more aircraft than just the A320 family would be a waste of time right now. It's on the list for future expansions but not just for one aircraft, we need a solution for hydraulics that works on all aircraft.

    So will we have realistic hydraulics in the future? For every aircrafts like a350,a320 and others?