Well since I live in asia, I would say Hong Kong,Taipei,Singapore and Jakarta or Bali.
If you like short - med trips you can fly for HKG-TPE or HND or TPE-SIN/PVG if you like exploring Asia
Or SIN-LAX maybe in a 787-9 or A35K.
Maybe if you like to explore South East Asia- go for SIN-BKK, CGK or KUL/SIN-DPS
Or maybe Middle East - go with DXB-DEL or DXB-IST
I suspect this might be a compatibility issue between our device and the game’s new version, as it mostly occurs on Chinese‑made phones like Xiaomi and vivo. When I roll back to the previous version, the game runs fine, but updating to the latest build causes a white screen, followed by the message “Please check that Google Play Services is enabled (as shown below).” In fact, my Google services are working properly. I hope this can be fixed soon, since I still have several months left on my subscription.😭😭😭
Check whether play protect is enabled. Some Chinese phones don’t have it or, did you install custom rom? (Very common in custom roms)
Looks’s brilliant! If possible, I’d love to help create some liveries!
In my country, Japan, there is a company called Skymark that operated A330-300 as Japan’s sole carrier for 7.5 months, approx. 229 days until it went bankrupt around 2014. Please let me create the Skymark livery! After that, I’d be happy to help with other airlines’ liveries too!PHOTO: Tadayuki YOSHIKAWA/Aviation Wire
And sadly that was the last Japanese a330 operator 😥 while ANA and JAL favored 767 And 777 more.
Thanks for your quick reply.
The main strenght of this sim seems to me is the reliability and smoothness.
I am getting hooked on this very fast loading and smooth operating simulator. Just yesterday I was looking forward to loading it up (instant!) when arriving home to do a quick little bush flight over some mountains. But there lies the question, as I am slowly getting addicted to this quick fix of flight as opposed to loading times of X-Plane with all of it's mods, for how long can we expect the Global scenery streaming to be available to us? I don't want to wake up one day realizing the online component is turned off and I get no buildings or textures outside the base game and dlc areas.
So if there exists some sort of guarantee of always being able to stream the scenery, my question then becomes irrelevant.
If they have bought the license or is using the license under the agreed terms with map providers like I think EOX is what Aerofly is using, then there won’t be issues in its usage.
If it’s like the case of Autoortho (which simmers use mostly in x plane 12.) (Which doesn’t have any official statement of usage) (I am not comparing flight sims here IPACS so please don’t delete) then maybe the providers may block the servers from streaming.
Since IPACS and EOX are based on Europe I don’t think they will have issues with the legal usage unless EOX has a specific rule stating clearly that it should be used under limited terms.
It’s out for apple please check
A minute of silence for the people who died in a massive air crash at SDF- R.I.P UPS 2976 😭🕯️
Ｗow! Finally it got its tail done. Will it include pax variant or is it “cargo only” for now?
Next preview: tail added.
Wings are added
Looks good. Can’t wait for the tail to prove it as MD-11.
Wow! Slowly Aerofly is getting more attention for making new 3rd party aircrafts. Good luck!!
One wish i have: can you make Airbus A300-600 after MD-11? (Just asking as, this is the backbone for airbus success and also, many airlines who are operating A330s have owned this majesty previously and the A310. NGL, it also does a rocket climb due to its engines.)
The new wings of the A330-300 are working properly! Thank you LarryLynx!
Looks wonderful! I wish I can paint my VA airlines livery for that A330 since, IRL it operates A330 with Trent700 engines.
Is it going to be a freeware or a payware. I don’t mind if I need to spend. Till now there’s no reliable A330s which I could fly in any sim, apart from toliss Neo.
Understood. But it still appears when flying manually FD's on at 50ft, am wondering what the FD's are commanding. I'll bury my head in the fcom for a bit. Thanks for your help.
Same, but I get what IPACS said.
Actually, the A320s flare at 30ft but at first i thought to flare when fcom says to flare.
No this is modeled accurately. The flare mode engages at 50ft and then starts with the flare at around 30-20ft. You can look at the flight director guidance if you want but it's not recommended to use it for manual landings. Your eyes should be outside at that point.
Oh I see, I got confused with the toliss showing on 30ft in it’s fcom. (Manual landing)
Hello everyone,
Why is the flare in A320 saying to initiate at 50ft? Irl the flare (according to the airbus manual) it says to initiate at 30ft.
But, in Aerofly’s A320, the FCOM is saying to do it at 50ft.
Is it a bug?
Your spec?
For me it’s working well being a 8gen ipad user
UPDATE
Our A330 is now a flying aircraft in Aerofly.
Teaser:
Hope to see them in the future. Looks great.
Only thing I want rn from af is: payload and weight optional (so it feels to fly like a real aircraft like x plane). and reworked modern graphics style (unlike x plane 12 natural looking graphics). I know it takes time to develop them. It will be a gem to see them for both AF4 and mobile.
But, still I enjoy flying this sim. At least , I can fly a legal 737 max than a illegal 737 max in x plane in the name of Walter white.
Will it be possible to be added for mobile tho?
It would be theoretically yes, but practically it depends on the polycount and the texture resolution. For example: you can render 8k textures or 4K textures easily in PC with powerful Graphics cards. But, you can’t do them in mobiles (especially android (even with a powerful chipsets). IOS doesn’t have much problem to this)
