Firstly the efb shows -273c even tho that was never inputted. Secondly the wind can't be changed for an odd reason, it resets everytime you leave. This next one may just be my lack of knowledge on the aircrafts systems but the vref+5 speed calculated by the efb is lower than the FMC vref speeds
Posts by bormine enthusiast
-
-
A few weeks ago I made a report on vulkan rendering issues where buildings kept flickering as you move around, even worse than fs2023 tbh, I'm running opengl and unfortunately it's worse if anything, buildings literally don't render above a certain altitude they get merged with the ground it seems, picture taken at 3k meters
-
Good evening, I've been facing some issues on the vulkan renderer. My device is a Xiaomi 15t pro which supports vulkan 1.3. The game runs well at over 40 FPS on max settings however I've noticed some issues: firstly the flickering buildings, I've heard about this in the forum here and assumed it was resolved yet i still see it in noticeable amounts, secondly the game defaults to opengl everytime I open the game even if vulkan was selected beforehand.
-
The sound is suppressed by our assistance intentionally. If you haven't taken action after a few seconds of the takeoff configuration warning it's unlikely that you understand what it means and it would just be annoying for you for the rest of the takeoff. If you disable the assistance for auto warnings it might continue a bit longer.
All my assistance is off
-
The takeoff config alarm turns off too soon on the 787, not sure how it is exactly in the sim if it's a time manner or speed but irl it turns off after v1 or 5 degrees pitch, it's incorrect on fs2023 however not sure about global
TikTok · mfahadnaimb5749 likes, 555 comments. “Air India AI171 (B787) crash has sparked debate about flap settings. 🛬 The 787’s DCAF system screams warnings,sirens, lights, EICAS…vt.tiktok.com -
Doesn’t necessarily mean it materially impacts performance, which it doesn’t feel like it does
It's not about what you feel like, look at engine displays, the 787 has great engines and is relatively light, it can even taxi on idle if it's light enough, look at n1 values at the same airport before and after choosing a derate, it tells you the takeoff n1 with the derate you chose on the top right of the thrust lim page, then click toga on takeoff, then compare n1s before and after derate, you're not going to hear much of a difference, or even feel much considering you're looking at -10 percent n1 in most cases, normal is 90 percent n1, n1 is what's often used to gauge the thrust or how much of the engine you're using, you can time your takeoff to see if it's affecting it, what wouldn't be normal however is having the same times for both derate and no derate
-
Whatever I change these to it doesn’t seem to make any difference to thrust, unlike with the 777, 747 or 737 where it is noticable.
I have also tried increasing the flex temp and it didn’t make any difference to thrust.
This aircraft tends to accelerate very quickly on full thrust and it would be helpful to have derate settings that slow it down to make it more controllable.Are you checking n1? I'm on 2023 ATM and 5 and 10 percent derate values work fine, and when I set a flex temp of 80(obviously extreme) n1 goes to 84, first 2 engine displays on the mfd
-
There is no trailer video yet but we have shown teaser screenshots of the A350 and A380 with working EFB / OIS.
Ah I see, I love the efb it seems really detailed, may I ask if the a320 could use a similar efb with some tweaks or would it be completely different ?
-
Did you forget about the A380 in the A350 trailer?
There's a trailer ?
-
Will the efb from the a350 be added to the a380 aswell ?considering both rely heavily on the efb in real world operations, could a similar efb be added to the a320 plus minus a few things to make it suit the aircraft ?
-
Is there any way to transfer a mod from pc to mobile, say I modified a region with the SDK, is there any way to copy the files to the mobile version or is it not compatible, I say this in general as I'd like to add a bunch of small and quality of life things to my sim
-
Are there any plans for improved non official add-on support ?scenery graphics planes etc, would be lovely to have
-
Display More
Well that's comparing apples and oranges.
One of these add-on aircraft costs more than the entire sim with 35 aircraft.
That said, I don't want to brag for my own work but the 737 and 777 are quite high quality, especially considering they are just one of many default aircraft in the sim. The 737 is a pretty good representation of the real aircraft with lots of system depth. The 777 is also quite good.
Please check out the product pages of the two aircraft to get an idea what they feature.
Of course, the price difference is rather large, and that's actually why I'm asking, I'm not the highest end user so I don't really see any difference, would a pilot see a difference in the products, also may I ask will the community a330 be available on mobile if its completed ?
-
Yes, for sure, but developing an aircraft takes a long time. And we are doing this in our free time, since we are still students.
Don't be inpatient
Ah no, I was just curious to see if it was still doing, of course it's fan made so it won't be as consistent, take your time
-
Is the project still going ?cuz no posts in 10 days
-
For those of you who've tried the pmdg 737 or newly released 777, how does the aerofly aircraft compare ?
-
-
Can people on android devices download scenery, or are MOST of the scenery files only for pc
-
An opaque layer of stratus would be nice, only the top and bottom would need texture.
What if you fly through it ?
-
Are we going to get better clouds, nearly every single flight sim in the past 15 years has better clouds than aerofly's repetitive identical 2d clouds, as lighting and shadows are improved I strongly believe clouds should follow along and not remain the same like they have in the past 4 years
