Posts by bormine enthusiast

    Of course, the price difference is rather large, and that's actually why I'm asking, I'm not the highest end user so I don't really see any difference, would a pilot see a difference in the products, also may I ask will the community a330 be available on mobile if its completed ?

    Shouldn't we then aim for improving the A380 MFD instead of avoiding it? Just saying...

    AFAIK the A350 MFD got experimental touch screens in the real world, so it would be more realistic even.

    Does this mean you guys are prioritising airport maps? Or are you guys doing maps and aircraft’s? Because as a member that has played since 2018 I believe it’s almost the same sortve aircraft each year? And I’m glad that the new max planes have come out but would like to know if there is gonna be more airbus related commercial planes or even other commercial? It would be cool if we could maybe do a c17 globe master which is Boeing obviously ? But would be cool to see more commercial planes and what not I know it takes ages to develop but would be nice to see more craft. But apart from that I love the sim

    You have to understand that, the Devs are responsible for literally everything in the game, little to no add-on Devs, so the workload is completely on them, unlike xplane and msfs

    Ive also noticed some other areas are super low resolution like the low quality scenery from fs2023, the trees and buildings are superb but looking left you'll see a mess with bad lighting effects

    Habe ich auch gesehen,aber ob das die Globale FS4 Version ist,oder die PC Version mit einem DLC??????

    Sieht auf jeden fall besser aus, hoffe das Dubai in der PC Version auch bald so schön aussieht!!!!!!!!!!!!!:thumbup::):):):)

    Ich wünsche mir, da kommt noch was schönes auf uns zu.;):):):)

    Jet-Pack (IPACS)
    February 16, 2024 at 4:48 PM

    You added my joke 😄😄

    Mine is

    A330

    A350

    A340 600

    Working gates

    Transparent windows on airports or at least make the glass mirrors instead of the 2d pictures on windows

    Weather system or at least rain with volumetric clouds

    Obviously icing is pretty nice and some quality of life features

    Weight and fuel system

    Using af 2023 for reference( I don't know when I'll get fs global) I get 32 FPS in a king air and a320, 34 FPS in the crj and 24 FPS in the 787, all of these tests were done outside of the cockpit, inside the cockpit the king air gets around 31 FPS, a320 30 FPS, crj 32fps and 787 22 FPS at ksfo, just wondering if this is fixed in af glob as I don't know whether my device will be able to run it even tho it is high end

    ive adjusted my resolution to fhd, and get about 28-30 fps in ksfo but only 22 at klax, i dont think ill be able to run fs global at high with 100 percent pixel density.

    does pixel density have a greater effect than resolution, or are they both the same considering reducing either one of them will reduce the amount of pixels being displayed

    please help admin

    Morning, I wonder if my device is capable of running aerofly fs global , it's a mi 12 pro with an 8g1 CPU adreno 730 and 12 gigs of ram, I know people who have way slower devices run the sim well, my doubt stems from the fact I can barely run aerofly fs 2023 at 20 FPS at max graphics qhd at SFO . I know someone who has a dimensity 1080(which is considerably slower than a Snapdragon 8g1) run the sim at max graphics at 30 FPS which seems very odd relative to my CPU

    Are we going to get better clouds, nearly every single flight sim in the past 15 years has better clouds than aerofly's repetitive identical 2d clouds, as lighting and shadows are improved I strongly believe clouds should follow along and not remain the same like they have in the past 4 years