Posts by FlyWorld

    Thank you for your extensive and painstaking work! I especially sincerely thank you for the Odesa airport (UKOO)!:love: I also wanted to offer the French Fort Boyard as an idea for new interesting places.

    I really liked these new airports. They created and added new airports to Africa, a continent that was lacking in this aspect. These new airports turned out perfect and very beautiful, in addition to the new monuments in the scenery, which also turned out beautiful and perfect. Simply fantastic.😃😃😃👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

    Hi, I was making an approach (B737-800) following the guidance correctly, I was at the FAF fix altitude, then I set the minimum altitude and followed the VNAV path/LNAV etc. However, when I was descending and tried to set the missed approach altitude, the aircraft strangely canceled the decision completely, even though it was supposed to continue the VNAV path. Did I do something wrong?

    In RNAV approaches, the Boeing 737-800 automatically creates a glide path on the PFD, very similar to an ILS. This indication remains on the PFD for almost the entire flight when VNAV and LNAV modes are activated. As you approach the destination airport, this glide path indication remains on the PFD and will initiate an automatic descent as you approach this path. Once you reach the minimum FAF altitude, observe the descending glide path indicator, and before reaching the final waypoint, engage the autopilot's approach mode (APP). The aircraft will then initiate an automatic descent upon reaching the glide path created by the activated VNAV and LNAV modes. It is mandatory that both VNAV and LNAV modes are activated, as they together create this descent path, allowing the approach mode to automatically descend the aircraft to the decision altitude where you can disengage the autopilot and perform a visual and manual landing.

    Hi, I was making an approach (B737-800) following the guidance correctly, I was at the FAF fix altitude, then I set the minimum altitude and followed the VNAV path/LNAV etc. However, when I was descending and tried to set the missed approach altitude, the aircraft strangely canceled the decision completely, even though it was supposed to continue the VNAV path. Did I do something wrong?

    What exactly were you trying to do? Did you attempt a precise RNAV approach with a safe landing, or did you abort the landing and initiate a missed approach procedure?

    To anyone that has access to the a321xlr does it burn fuel like the Cessna172?

    I bought the A321XLR, but it doesn't have fuel consumption. This means the fuel is unlimited, and you can fly for several hours in a row, even from New York to Tokyo, and the fuel will never run out. Currently, only the Cessna 172 has fuel consumption. All other aircraft have no fuel consumption, meaning it's absolutely unlimited.

    You bring paint schemes for the A350, but you don't do the most important thing, which is to darken the cockpit windows... Honestly, those overly "clear" windows look awful.

    This excessive transparency in the windows is really annoying, and I don't understand why they insist on this mistake before launching the plane. Not correcting this flaw will only increase user frustration and complaints here on the forum.

    Will you post a video? I'm curious to hear the sound. It's available on Android, but since I'll be buying it on my iPad, I haven't had the chance to check it out on Android yet.

    I don't usually post videos on YouTube, but I can guarantee that this is a top-quality aircraft where you can experience incredible flights with the highest level of realism possible. I bought this plane and I don't regret it. I'm very satisfied and have nothing to complain about regarding the A321XLR.

    I bought the A321XLR and found it to be an incredible, very docile, and wonderful plane to fly. The engine sound is spectacular, providing an unparalleled realistic and immersive experience. I really liked this new plane and have already flown it three times today. I only missed having more liveries, as it only came with 7 in total. I hope more liveries will be added to this spectacular aircraft.

    He said, that money is not the main problem.

    The biggest problem is, that taking care/ the administration of the webiste takes a lot of time. Each new Upload as to be checked and in the past few month there has been a lot of many uploads with limited description, and in general more uploads. He doesn't want to invest his time into flight-sim.org.

    Why he banned you, I can't tell, but for sure not of revenge or because he is very hostile and authoritarian. Maybe it is because you have only downloaded and didn't take part of any disscusion. Only taking, without being an active member for Flight-sim.org.

    I wasn't aware that the site was blocked for downloads because I hadn't accessed it in a while. I only discovered the download block recently when I tried to download some add-ons. I then closed the site because I saw that downloads were blocked. When I returned to make a monetary donation, I realized my account had been banned without me having done anything at all, since I didn't participate in the discussion forum. Therefore, I interpreted this ban as a hostile and authoritarian act, since this person also did this to other users. It seems like he's promoting a mass account ban on the site as a form of retaliation or revenge for users not making monetary donations. Or it could be a kind of blackmail to get what he wants. That's why I'm so irritated. It seems like this person banned me just because I went back to the site to make a donation.

    You're probably doing this to users (banning accounts) as a form of revenge or retaliation for not receiving donations to continue maintaining your site, which I find completely absurd. I was going to make a donation to help you continue maintaining the site, but since you banned my account without me having made any donation at all, as I only downloaded files without commenting on the forum, I won't do it anymore and I leave with an extremely bad impression of you because I see that you act in a hostile, aggressive and authoritarian way on the flight-sim.org site, banning the accounts of users like me who access the site only to download files without participating in the forum. I had a kind intention to help you continue with the site, but you don't seem to be someone trustworthy.

    I only use this site to download files, but the owner banned my account without me doing absolutely anything. I don't even participate in the discussion forum and only download add-on files, but the site owner started banning several accounts, including mine, without any apparent reason, in an extremely hostile, authoritarian, and aggressive manner, turning the site into a kind of dictatorship. I believe he must be doing this as revenge because users aren't financially supporting him with the site's costs. I was going to make a donation, but when I logged in, I discovered that my account had been banned, even though I only downloaded files occasionally and not very frequently.

    I understand that the site needs financial resources to continue operating, however your attitude of banning my account without me having done absolutely anything was extremely hostile, aggressive, rude, and authoritarian. I didn't even comment on the site, I only downloaded files, but you went and banned my account. You also did this to other users. Aren't you ashamed of yourself for doing this nonsense on the site and turning it into a dictatorship where you ban users' accounts? I was going to make a monetary donation to help the site, but you banned my account without me doing anything, and I became extremely angry with you. I wanted to openly insult you in this comment, but I won't do that out of respect for the IPACS moderators who own this forum and the users.

    What was the reason for the site's closure and deletion? The owner of this site simply blocked access to the files and began banning numerous accounts for no apparent reason, in a completely hostile and authoritarian manner.

    I also noticed several new paint schemes on some aircraft, such as the Atlas Air livery on the Boeing 777F and the KLM 100th anniversary livery on the Boeing 787-10. I thought that was fantastic. I really liked it.

    I simply loved this update. I liked absolutely everything that came in this update. One detail that really caught my attention is that the aircraft windshield wipers are now functional. I thought that was really cool.

    Do you know where the aircraft carrier is located? Is it in a fixed location or can it be moved? And how do you view the passenger cabin of the A350? Your feedback is excellent and rich in detail. Congratulations!👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼