Adding the Cessna G1000 would also be a big deal for Aerofly.
Posts by FlyWorld
-
-
I confirm that they are missing on the Baron and the C-172, unlike with AFS2 as mentioned by Armitage
However, there are still some GA models, with either a somewhat basic map or a complete GPS but all functional.
DR-400
Extra330
Pitts14
Tomahawk PA38
Then they also exist on other optional models.
C152
D027
Duchesse76
PA38
Piper III
Piper IV
and Tecnam
However, I don't know why IPACS skipped these two models for FS4?
Your post is very good. I really liked.👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼
-
I confirm that they are missing on the Baron and the C-172, unlike with AFS2 as mentioned by Armitage
However, there are still some GA models, with either a somewhat basic map or a complete GPS but all functional.
DR-400
Extra330
Pitts14
Tomahawk PA38
Then they also exist on other optional models.
C152
D027
Duchesse76
PA38
Piper III
Piper IV
and Tecnam
However, I don't know why IPACS skipped these two models for FS4?
The right thing to do now would be for the IPACS team to work on adding GPS to the Baron and Cessna instead of bringing three more gliders, which I think is a waste of time. Furthermore things like ATC, real weather, weight and balance in addition to multiplayer deserved better attention.
-
I am happy that there will be more gliders, including self-propelled ones.
Few people like gliders.
I meant the screenshots, not the videos. And I am pretty sure it was a GPS in the Duchess (screenshot 4) and Bonanza, as well as a moving map in the C172 (picture 8), because these were the planes I have been flying back than.
I've never seen GPS on Aerofly's general aviation planes.
-
I’m not complaining about the a321 but I gotta agree with you on that, gliders are not it we need what the community asked for😀
Motorized aircraft are always welcome. I thought it was super cool to know that the team is working on the A321. Now as for gliders, it's a pure waste of time. There is no need to bring two gliders right away as almost no one likes this type of aircraft. The time spent developing these two gliders could be invested in implementing GPS on the Baron and Cessna 172 in addition to other much more important features that I mentioned in previous comments.
-
IPACS should focus on implementing GPS on the Baron and Cessna instead of bringing in two more gliders. Almost no one flies gliders and I think it's a waste of time.
Personally, I don't like gliders. I don't know about other people, but I hate this type of aircraft because it is very bad to fly in flight simulators. As I mentioned in the previous comment, I consider it a waste of time to bring more gliders to Aerofly FS. The focus should be on features highly requested by the community such as multiplayer, ATC, fuel consumption, weight and balance, rain, among others.
Actually for FS 2 there were DLC aircrafts with a GPS unit (scroll the screenshots).
And there was a moving map in the C172 in FS2 (also scroll the screenshots), as far as I remember. It used the regular map data, without any additional interactivity.
I was unable to identify the existence of GPS on these Aerofly FS2 planes that appear in the video. Are you sure these planes had GPS?
-
There used to be
This GPS was not functional. It was just a still image.
-
He should add the Garmin G1000 avionics at a Baron B58 & The Cessna 172
I agree. The GPS is sorely missed on these two aircraft.
-
Is it planned to add Garmin GPS to the Baron 58 and Cessna 172? Jet-Pack (IPACS)
-
I was really pleased to know that the A321 will soon arrive at Aerofly FS Global but it would also be great to add Garmin GPS to the Baron 58 and Cessna 172 as these planes only fly via VOR and NDB.
-
I believe there is no interest from the Aerofly developers in bringing this support to the simulator.
-
Please keep this topic about the potential for American/Southwest/Ryanair on the 737-900 or MAX 9. If you want to request real liveries, make your own topic.
I don't see any problem with that, after all this topic talks about paintings. If no restrictions were established by the moderators, then everything is fine.
-
-
Jet-Pack (IPACS) Why don't the high-resolution images of the Canary Islands appear here for me? The terrain of all these islands remains blurry and in low resolution.
Please try to clear your app cache.
I cleared the cache as you suggested but the problem persists.
-
I want to buy this game but problem is that there is no tutorial. I have watched videos of aero fly global but when I am taking off from one airport to another destination, my plane don't reached to the destination. I don't know what is the issue . Can any one make a good tutorial from cold start to end.
You are probably making mistakes in operating the aircraft. For this reason you cannot reach your destination.
-
Please try to clear your app cache.
Your suggestion didn't work here. The entire terrain of the Canary Islands is blurred and out of focus. Are you sure you have released high-resolution terrain images to all users?
-
It was announced on the blog that high resolution images of the Canary Islands and surrounding areas had been added but what I noticed was a blurred and low resolution terrain as you can see in the screenshots below.
-
There are no parking spaces for aircraft. Furthermore, this airport looks very beautiful in 3D.
-
This airport looks very beautiful in 3D. Congratulations to IPACS for another excellent job.
-
I never tire of repeating that this is a magnificent work by IPACS. Everyone is to be congratulated.