Recently saw someone posting A380 with 2 tilted landing gears. Is this the sign of getting A330 in sim soon? 
Posts by sherdil
-
-
I don’t think so. But do you have such a statistic now?
what does base product means i didnt understand that ?
-
Aerofly communities outside the forum are hard to find, or simply don't exist at all. How would you all feel if I created a Discord server where we could share pictures and videos of our flights and talk about the sim in a more open setting, since you're not able to do that on the forum? If you're interested, I'll create it.
There is a group on facebook thats the only major community of Aerofly after forum
-
I think its weather systems and i hope we get realtime weather and other features
-
Display More
In my case it's funny because ingame stats doesn't reflect the reality, only the real time AF has been open and active while flying them. Not the total times you used a plane.
In my case it use to be some of these depending on what I want to do. I'd also would represent a logical path or series of normal flights:
LEARJET: All that comes to mind, plus trying to fly from and to areas normally suiited for smaller airplanes.
CONCORDE: Pretty much anything that comes to mind, challenges I set myself, and also emulating "real" routes.
737 NG: Comercial flights and specially when coming or leaving Canary Islands or europe comercial airports.
KING AIR: "Bush" landing and smaller routes from difficult areas to some bigger airports.
F15: Looking for new areas and try to do some difficult things like flying slow with high angle of attack, reaching max altitudes, landing or taking off on smallest air strips etc.
Helicopter EC135: Helipads, etc. Specially on montainous areas such as Lukla to Everest basecamp, also cities, and trying to land on top of the most ridiculous things. Also some difficult piloting through narrow passages through mountains come to mind.
Some tlme ago, and still sometimes I also fly 747,777 300-ER, A320, 787, F18, CESSNA.
"Logical" flight routes I sometimes do.
I could for example represent as close as reality how a flight from some big airport into the Everest would look like starting with either a private jet to a big airport in India or a commercial flight. Then a turboprop such as the BARON or the King Air to Lukla since we don't have the planes that actually flight groups there. In some ocassions I use CESSNA to make it slower or Learjet if I fancy a challenge. From there I take a helicopter to basecamp up the hill.. And then reverse the route all the way to point of origin.
The screenshot is from the 2nd helipad (not the closest I was referring to) where I stopped on my way down to "pick up" some passengers before returning to LUKLA. You can tell how deeply detailing the scenarios IPACS has been. What an amazing job guys.
This poll is about 3 most flown and fav aircraft of users. Obviously i do fly all of them and most of us do the same but we always have fav airliners that we fly most this post is about that
Display MoreI'd say that my top 5 are:
1) B747-400
2) B737-500
3) B737-900ER
4) A320-200
5) Dash 8 Q400
I'm looking to seeing a middle-of-market aircraft soon! (B757/767/A330/A340, etc.)
Your " middle of market " aircraft list is quit a lot i think it would take ages to launch these aircrafts which you have mentioned 😀
My fav airliners:
^ A320
^ B77W
^ B78X
-
Fav Airliner of Aerofly Global FS Users
-
MAX GS you can achieve with 777 is 550 kts ( WITH FULL WINDS ) which is less cuz i have seen it flying around 600kts GS which is due to winds
-
Can devs add more windspeed? Right know it goes up to 39kts only and long haul routes depends on airspeed ( specially travelling from west to east ) I dont think its a big deal to just increase speed in sim
-
Display More
Why?
I recon most people in other sims are not just because 1 model of airplane.
Most of the time the main factors are:
- Able to fly worldwide
- Realism
- Weather & ATC
- Airplanes
If not in that order, quite similar. Maybe I'm forgetting something but you get the point. And by that logic you can agree partially at least. Why? Imagine a "sim" with all the planes in the world... no realism, you can only fly in a region, and there is no weather or ATC... Nobody would join there. All things considered... if people jump into a different sim something really great needs to be flagged on the alternative or else they wouldn't (price + equal sim quality is 1 reason, but not all: If they for ex invested a lot in a different sim and they need to re-invest... Which is also not the case here).
Imho once this sim has ATC plus weather... then adding planes and more airports would be logical, but not the other way around business wise.
Able to fly world wide is both same for sims. But aerofly doesn't have fake satellit images at least. About realism both sims are same.Weather is definitely plus point for that sim but ATC and multiplayer isnt too great ive played that couldn't find anyother player. Aircrafts are outstanding in aerofly Each and every aircraft has almost full cockpit switches working ( except FMC) + liveries, number of GA Aircrafts and helicopters its far more better than other sim. Its funny when i tried playing 777 there it was horrible no cockpit interaction except for few buttons. Plus you need to pay for navigraph otherwise fmc is of no use at all and you cant make proper routes.Aerofly uses older airac but navigation works perfect. And at last is the price which can go up to 18 euros a month which isnt worth it at all in my opinion. Aerofly lacks some features but the rapid development of the sim considering the fact its been just 6 months sim is launched . And we have so many 3d airports and some minor improvements
-
Tbh if aerofly introduces Any airbus it would be quit astonishing cuz they recently released max. Any updates regarding weather and atc would be great. If they released A330 i bet number of users of competitor simulator will decrease by alot 💀
-
I have been playing Aerofly FS Global for a long time and I have been just ignoring the physics. The physics are worst then Microsoft flight simulator. I'm just saying the Physics should be like almost X-Plane 12 sort of. I really like Aerofly FS Global Mobile but that is just the one problem. It needs better physics.
You wont get msfs or xplane 12 kind of physics in mobile cuz after all its a phone as developers dont want our phones to explode but physics of aerofly is much better than other simulators out there
-
I hope we see some major change in sim
-
The 737 Max has only become so well known through the accidents
Boeing should give up on max and try improving NG and 78X cuz max has too many problems each of them line up like traffic on Heathrow. max will cost them tooo much
-
I forgot about the Max incident almost every week a very certain someone kept on making threads on when the max was comming
A330 is far more popular than max ( in my opinion)
-
Is it even officially stated?
All we can do is hope...
Cuz they try to keep future developments private
-
I'd be fine with an A350-900 (NOT 1000- we have too many stretched variants and none have been converted into "regular" versions yet) if it had KLM/Delta/Air France/Swiss liveries (some are future operators).
Also, since we have been told that the reason for selecting large variants is to shrink them eventually, I'm hoping to eventually see the A319 (or A321 which has different flaps), B777-200LR, B787-8/9, B737-700, B737 MAX 8, CRJ700, etc.
I would like to see A320 neo and 333 or 359. This sim really needs a medium-long haul airliner
-
I think we should let Ipacs focus on upcoming aircraft (333) only so we dont get delays in that
-
I don't think it's that easy to convert an airliner from an RC game into a realistic flight simulation.
But we’ll see what Ipacs will “gift” us in the near future:)
HOPING for An Airbus
-
this airport includes in free scenery ( north america region ) ?
I think this airport is visible due to satellite scenery but not modelled by IPACS -
Holding looks absolutely Perfect just like if it has been done through FMC
✈
