Is it possible to make it lock it in place so I don’t accidentally apply brakes
I guess what you want is to be able to control the braking and thrust separately, right?
Is it possible to make it lock it in place so I don’t accidentally apply brakes
I guess what you want is to be able to control the braking and thrust separately, right?
I’m sure IPACS already knows the constant requests for free cam on mobile, and this thread is to hopefully provide a sort of push for players wanting this feature. A large portion of aerofly users are mobile, and free cam is available on PC but not for mobile. This feature is highly requested by the community, so I was sort of shocked to see it not included in this update. If IPACS were to see this thread, could you please give us reason on why free cam isn’t already added on mobile or why it couldn’t get added?
It's not what you think. IPACS has not actually promised to develop a free camera on the mobile phone, but the forum has been calling for it. I think this is more like the illusion of players. Of course, I also hope to have this function, because it is really interesting.
The PAPIs have been shown to be about 40% true size ages and ages ago. They must be too much trouble to fix.
I see. I hope it can be optimized later.
Is there any good solution to improve the resolution of the runway in the long-term situation in the game?In the visual approach flight, because the runway is too vague, it seems a little difficult to establish a suitable visual reference to aim at the runway and glide slope, and it is hoped to be repaired.
Also i found some issue of the update slow rendering on building s and night lights slow loading in aircraft selection ,so yeah sorry for the change topic
Perhaps it has something to do with the optimized rendering mechanism. Previously, IPACS said that it would optimize the rendering distance and area in exchange for a stable frame rate.
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-2YG_S…ew?usp=drivesdk The previous link is a video of a Boeing 737 landing from a player I got from other platforms. This video is the most realistic video I have ever heard of engine sound sampling. Please put on headphones for IPACS to enjoy.It's not clear how IPACS processes the engine sound sampling of the model and installs it in the corresponding folder, but I hope the IPACS team can adopt this video example.The reason is that this is very close to the roaring sound of the engine of the Boeing 737 model I have sat in in reality. The low frequency at idle speed and low speed is rich and noiseless, and the sound at medium and high speed is loud and sharp but not harsh, and the recognition is extremely high.Of course, this is just a suggestion. If possible, I hope the IPACS team will adopt and update the existing 737 engine sound sampling.
The idle sound in the last few seconds is the bright spot, very vigorous, low and magnetic.
I forgot to add that the sound quality of the small version updated today has improved on my device. The reason why the previous comments said this is based on the fact that before the update, someone lost his mind. Just watch him go crazy quietly and respect the fate of others.
The sound has indeed changed. I think it should be used directly after recording, so I speculate that the file was modified. The sound of the flaps has changed noticeably compared to reality.
The high-frequency chainsaw-like sound of the engine is quite noticeable, but I haven’t had time to listen carefully to the other sounds yet.
The high frequency is fine, but the low frequency is completely in a daze. You can't tell what is ringing by listening to the sound outside the cabin. You should do noise reduction. The sound field of the flap when it is deployed and retracted is far away. Maybe it was really intercepted from a video and installed ...
The sound of the flaps doesn't need modulation; it can be used directly as recorded. Regardless of the situation—whether the flaps are set to position 1, position 2, or fully extended—the sound they produce remains the same.
I saw through the translator that you said that the sound of the flap was out of tune, and I also felt that the audio was out of line and stuck in the game, so I said it might be an audio sampling problem.Secondly, I feel that the sound sampling of the engine of 350 seems to explode the level. When the volume is amplified to a certain extent but not the maximum, the audio quality seems to be burnt out.
I’m not saying there’s a reason for it to be on any plane, but until it gets remodeled or rain/snow gets added there’s no purpose besides just for a useless quality of life feature.
I don't understand what you want to express. There is no meteorological system now. I don't know what standard you use to define which games have rain and snow functions and which don't.Even if the weather system comes out, according to your logic, other planes don't deserve wipers? As long as the meteorological system comes out, it will be a matter of time before wipers are popularized, right?Of course, I just suggested this from beginning to end, because not everyone is an Airbus fan, and Boeing also has classic aircraft modelsmodels.I think this is a very normal demand.
I mean they could but to what use would it be if there is no rain or snow in the sim currently?
I think you're mistaken. You didn't develop this function just for its usefulness. According to you, there is no meteorological function at present, so what's the use of installing wipers on the 350? I think every plane should be complete.
⑥When opening or closing the flaps, the sound is a bit strange, seems a little off-key.
⑦After the plane takes off, the main landing gear quickly returns to an angle parallel to the fuselage, but the Aerofly A350 needs to wait about 5 seconds.
I guess it's the problem of audio sampling, which may be directly through a recorded audio sampling and forcibly using the audio editing function, so as to achieve the effect of falling tone, so it's unnatural.I tested monitor headphones wearing an iron triangle in the game, and many audio of 350 had great flaws.
First of all, I am very grateful to IPACS for carefully preparing the 350-1000 for nearly a year. I have to say that it is a good model, but I am a Boeing enthusiast. Can you consider adding wipers to Boeing's full range and have the same functions as Airbus in modeling?
Display MoreHello developers, here is a suggestion for improvement for aerofly Global on both platforms:
- the simulator is demanding a lot of battery usage
- improve the pushback control (it is almost impossible to use it to make turns to align the aircraft in taxi
NOTE: When I said that the simulator is demanding a lot of battery, I speak for myself.
Example: my cell phone is at 100% battery, after 10 minutes playing in the simulator, my cell phone is already at half battery, that is, 50% battery. My cell phone is new, it is not even 2 months old and has 5000 amps.
My smartphone model: Motorola Moto G 5g
The power problem, I think you may need a new mobile phone.
This function greatly improves my visual field of reference when performing visual approach.
Yes, this function is too nostalgic. I hope to have this function, and I think most people do, too, because it can improve the game experience.
The 767 unfortunately isn’t a very popular plane which would give IPACS less of a reason to add it. I wish it could get added aswell. But they probably wouldn’t risk spending many months developing a plane just for it not to bring that much more attention.
We are paid players, and it is reasonable to make some requests. Whether there is a chance to make 767 in the future is another matter.
If you zoom in or look around, does this change how the screens appear?
Yes, looking around will trigger it with a high probability, and zooming in sometimes will.
What device do you use and how long do you need to fly before this occurs?
I'm not sure whether it has anything to do with the flight time, because it appears completely randomly, so I can't find the law of its appearance. Sometimes it will be triggered by gently moving the screen a little, and then the whole cockpit will become like a bar or KTV singing hall, flashing around. . . .
Try to not accidentally swipe the glass screen selection knobs.
I'm talking about the screen flashing black at random frequency, and there is no solution. My Boeing 787 has failed.