Posts by alphasixx

    I think the main point the developers are trying to make is that at the moment, adding Simbrief simply won’t add any benefit to their target audience, which are casual simmers. And that’s fine - Aerofly is in itself, a casual sim, comparing it to the likes of say X-plane or MSFS (no offence is intended here, it’s just the reality!)

    To them adding simbrief or updating the nav base simply isn’t worth it as there is only a section of users who use this sim for more realistic purposes (which includes me)

    I’ve proposed updating the nav base many times here but the answer has remained the same from the developers for over a year now. I think it’s time we abandon this topic as it’s clearly not a priority by the developers, as much of a shame as it is.

    Hi, thank you!

    I suppose what you’re asking is to have Aerofly show the data from Abflug, am I right?
    There is no known method up until now to tell the Aerofly traffic where to go (at least, none on Mac). So for now we have to limit ourselves on what I can do with the server and what you can see in Rewinger.
    Was that the question?

    Best regards!

    Yes that was precisely my question, thanks for answering! All the best with this

    Really cool project! I have a question, the way I understand this is that the traffic will only be showed on the map, and not inside the game itself right? I was wondering is it possible to somehow tie this server to the in-game traffic feature, so we can see the traffic in the game itself through the simplified traffic models?


    Nonetheless I will be watching your project with great interest

    Dear IPACS, after requesting the Qatar A320 many times here on the forum and Jan telling me that unfortunately it cannot be added because of the mapping issue… I now present to you the Qatar A320neo! It was recently seen in its full livery in Toulouse after many delays.

    Hopefully we’ll get to see it in Aerofly in an update soon once we get the official Qatari registrations for these birds.


    Image credit: wingsview_tls on instagram

    The current A320 texture UV map currently does not allow us to add more repaints. We first have to re-do all of the existing ones with the new UV mapping like on the A319, A321 and A320neo before we can add new repaints or different engines. We prioritized releasing the A320neo and 787-9 this year, so the old A320 had to wait.

    Jan, I wanted to ask is there any plans to introduce Mac support for the Aerofly livery converter tool?

    I know Jan already said that there shouldn’t be a huge performance impact because of a new rendering technique they are using, but it would be nice if there was an option to disable the cabin in case the performance impact is too much on desktop.

    I've always believed FS4 is a niche type of SIM "IMO" and has a niche following (5,200 users) as posted recently in the forum. It's more geared to the casual simmer who wants a quick once around the block before work or when time allows. Of course "IMO". When 9 people in an office can pull off a smooth running glitch free SIM like FS4, compared to 500+ people like that other 800lb gorilla SIM that's constantly in a mess, something always going wrong update after update, I'd say that's pretty impressive. Why is that...:/......? Someone once said "Kiss" (keep it simple stupid). I tend to agree, simple is better, less is always more. Just my 2 cents. You see FS4 just works period, function over form. ;)

    You’re absolutely right that Aerofly is a niche sort of sim, and is fantastic for what it has, but you’re comparing apples to oranges, the ‘gorilla sim’ you mention has maybe 4 times the amount of features that Aerofly has and is far more complex in many aspects. The more complex features you have the more possibility for bugs…

    As soon as something is mentioned on a roadmap users expect that thing to be released within a month or so. But that is not how software development works. It sometimes takes years to finalize a feature because more important things come up and it's put on the back burner. Some large features are very complex and require a lot of restructuring which doesn't happen over night.

    Announcing a feature too early and then delaying it over and over is annoying and disappointing. Expectations also seem to rise the longer a feature has been announced and once it's released these false expectations pop like a bubble and the overall enjoyment is ruined.

    We constantly monitor the forum and other user feedback channels to see what users have issues with and what we can improve. And most of these bugs are actually fixed quite quickly unless there is a major update in the development as right now, which holds up those minor fixes.

    We get a good idea what users want but what they actually need might be a different story. We also have to evaluate what new features would make Aerofly FS more attractive and more enjoyable for more users in the long run.

    Just as an example: Users say they want real world and real time weather. But what they actually need is someone giving them a real challenge during the flight, which is engaging and enjoyable when it can be mastered by the user. So even fake weather or accurate historical weather would probably be as rewarding as seeing the raindrops on the windscreen in the sim when it's also raining outside your front door.

    Hi Jan, thanks for responding. At the end of the day, you guys are the team and you will make the end decisions you deem necessary. I completely understand where you’re coming from when it comes to announcing things and then people becoming stubborn, i’ve seen it happen with the A350. But the thing is, I dont think that you announcing features early is the point or problem here. The problem is the complete lack of information, we’ve been left now with genuinely no spoilers, no teasers, zero idea as to what you guys are currently working on.

    In my opinion, having the forum in silence and not giving any sorts of updates will only create more speculation as to what’s happening. If you have months pass with nothing to look forward to, I think the silence itself becomes its own source of disappointment, no?

    Ultimately, transparency builds trust. Even if features take a long time to make with potential delays etc, knowing why things are taking time makes the wait feel purposeful rather than uncertain. So I’m not proposing for a solid and confirmed roadmap, but rather just a bit more ongoing info into development so we feel informed rather than left guessing.

    Again I’m not one to tell you how to do your job, I’m simply stating my personal opinion which some other users seem to share as well.

    Evry development team is different. On mobile, Aerofly is the best flight simulator. It's not perfect, but nothing is perfect. Other competitors have way less detailed aircraft, Aerofly has no rain or crash physics. If you don't like Aerofly, you don't have to play it.

    I am mostly a PC user so I’m not very familiar with the mobile version, although I do have it on my iPad. I do agree with you that Aerofly is by far the best mobile simulator. But, like I said, this post is mostly directed towards the PC version

    In my language, this would be classed as "damning with faint praise".

    There is no reason why you, me, or anyone else who is not part of the IPACS Team, should be provided with commercially sensitive information such as proposed developments.
    All the points you are trying to raise yet again have been asked and answered many times in the past 5 years or so. Please learn how to search the forum and you will see how often the group I call the professional complainers have raised repeatedly the same issues.

    IPACS do quality work, and their updates just work - without any hotfixes to undo the damage done by the previous hotfix.
    If you want Aerofly to provide a clone of some other simulator, maybe you could provide them the same budget and resources that that other simulator has?

    Well, it seems your language and mine have some differences.

    I do not need you to teach me how to use this forum, I know very well. I just provided some feedback to IPACS, whether they want to take this into account is completely up to them. If they continue this way, they will get the same feedback again and again. Like I said, I am a loyal user to Aerofly and will continue to do so as I want the best for IPACS and their product, but I can post my thoughts on a forum that was precisely made for that purpose.