Posts by Tomfa

    Even with full frame rates my R22 is unresponsive and falsely pseudo-stabilised. I fly it with horrible exaggerated inputs and it gives me pilot induced oscillations from soft and delayed control response. It is truly awful and completely unacceptable.

    M1 iPad pro 8 GB.

    If you're interested, go take a little spin on FS4 with an A350 or 380 and do a simple little approach at LSGG and LSZH and tell me again about your FPS experience. I think there is a serious general problem, but I don't know what they think about it in Tubingen?

    Maybe they have changed the rendering setting for each profile. Possibly you can change it manually by editing the config text file. Just need to know the correct line.

    After testing by reducing the quality to medium, it works normally, however this must not be a sufficient reason, because if I make different approaches in France, Germany, or Austria, all in Ultra mode, I do not notice this problem of trees. It seems to me that in Switzerland, the bad luck persists on several factors,, including that of a descent into hell of FPS with the A350 and 380, then the structure of certain Hangars destroyed, and now the trees. It is starting to be a lot.

    And If IPACS is reading this thread, it would be interesting to have your opinion, thanks!

    All in all, I don't think it's worth the effort; there would certainly be too many things to change.
    Personally, I can do without these two models. Because after all the hard work you, ApfelFlieger and chrispriv , have put at our disposal to beautify Switzerland, I'm not going to disable all these add-ons just for the A350 and A380, because all other IPACS models and those from krzysk work without any problems. Thanks again for everything! :)

    Thank you both, Michael and Pascal. This is the forum I was used to for many years, helpful, supportive.

    My findings: there are single swiss airfields that bring down the fps to 40 or less from 170. If I have all activated it kind of sums up and stays with 7-9 fps.

    Thanks to you too for your help Thomas! Yes, certainly there must be a lot of isolated airfields, but I think more with these bugs on the LSZH side.

    I like to look at the affected airfields, maybe the causes can be easily eliminated

    Here is my conclusion: all airfields work for me regarding LSGG. However, if I add, for example, (lshu_geneve_hospital_university_heliport), the problems start, and near this area, the image quality is jerky with a significant drop in FPS. However, I have not tested at LSZH, given the large number (hospital heliports, mountain landing sites, airfields, etc.). ApfelFlieger , if you can find a solution to this, it would be greatly appreciated, Thank you! But for the moment it is preferable for me not to use these two airports with the A350 and the A380 unlike with all the others of the Airbus or Boeing series which do not have this problem.

    Please check that your graphics card is actually being used and not your graphics chip on the processor. Go to the NVIDIA control panel and select the high performance graphics card for Aerofly FS 4.

    Thanks Jan for this solution, but it wasn't related to a processor or card problem, but as Thomas described, it came from the airfields. By disabling them, no more problems. :)

    Hi Thomas,

    I noticed this too, but it is not a problem of textures, cultivation, POI, or xref, it is the plane itself, the same for the A380 since the last update, depending on the airports. For example, in Dusseldorf or Frankfurt, I have no problems. Certainly, there's a slight drop in FPS, but no stuttering or crashing. I don't know where this problem could be coming from, except for something internal to these two models. Maybe IPACS will be able to see this.

    At the time it was mainly linked to a problem with the bolts of the reactors involved. Today Boeing has done little better in general with the 737max series, or even WORSE

    Completely agree for a DC-6 version and followed by the legendary DC-8-62 preferably. :)

    My opinion regarding airports: I think IPACS has nothing to be ashamed of compared to the current competition (paid add-ons). However, I remain particularly picky about the smallest details, but overall, these are magnificent 3D models. Not forgetting the hand-crafted ones, including the small airfields. Of course, there are always small details here and there, such as some missing name, particularly in Geneva, or the addition of road signs, but these are just small details.

    Personally, I think it would be preferable, as a priority, for IPACS to focus more on the coastal areas, with more accurate flattening of the terrain, not to mention better textures generated in HD.

    My wish would always be to hope that we will one day see some new small GA models on this platform. 8)
    Afterwards, everything will at the TOP!

    And to conclude this thread, after this BIG WAR (teaser and others...) on the A350, one some of this little world will remain calm and quiet for a while, I hope!

    This model is a marvel and a 100% success!!! :love: 👌👏👍

    Thanks to all IPACS for your work and have a great weekend!