Posts by Criticalairline

  • Thank you Aerofly and happy New year 2026

    To those who make our dreams fly,

    If you are reading these lines, then please know one thing first: this message comes from the heart.

    I wanted to take a moment to say thank you. Thank you to the entire Aerofly team for the incredible work you have done this year. Every update, every aircraft, every improvement, every detail shows something very rare today: true passion. Thanks to you, Aerofly is not just a simulator, it is a place where many of us learn, grow, and dream bigger.

    Personally, Aerofly has helped me get closer to aviation, understand procedures, train seriously, and nurture a dream that I hope will one day become reality. And I know I am not the only one.

    I would also like to address everyone on the forum. Even if I do not know you personally, even if we have never spoken, I want to say something sincere: I love you all. Your messages, advice, discussions, and kindness are what keep this community alive. You are like brothers, united by the same passion.

    I wish you all a long life filled with health, success, and peace. Please continue to keep this unique spirit, respect, and mutual support that make Aerofly different from everything else.

    Thank you to the developers for your dedication.

    Thank you to the community for your humanity.

    And thank you to Aerofly for allowing us, every day, to take off a little higher.

    Happy New Year 2026 to all of you.

    May it be filled with success, happiness, and many unforgettable flights ✈️

    With all my respect and affection,

    An aviation enthusiast

  • Development Teasers

    Quote from 747

    The B789 and the A20N have together over 90 liveries. Liveries are currently IPACS's bottleneck, so if they would have done more, this would have hindered other aircraft from receiving liveries and being released. 35 for the B789 and 55 for the A20N are enough. They had to draw the line somewhere.

    juste 2 BRO ???.?

  • Development Teasers

    Quote from AHD

    Can you all stop crying about a few liveries.

    :


    I’m simply making an important request — that’s all. If I don’t mention it, the developers might never consider adding it. It feels like some people here are only saying this because they are not personally interested in the livery, but whether I complain or not has absolutely no impact on your lives. You can just ignore my message if it doesn’t concern you.

    The developer himself will decide if he’s tired of hearing about it or not.

    Again, this is just a request. I only posted two messages and I don’t plan on posting more. I’m sure the developers will see what I wrote anyway.

  • Development Teasers

    Quote from Eduardo190

    Enough already, this has gotten out of control. Stop spamming people with the same requests... the developers will surely add them in a future update... stop

    I have absolutely no problem with what the developers have done — it’s incredible work and truly impressive. It’s just that with this whole update, I was also really looking forward to seeing this airline added. It honestly surprised me and threw me off, because I don’t understand why it wasn’t included when it seemed like such an obvious addition to the simulator. But as you said, we’ll see if they decide to add it later.


    🛑

  • Development Teasers

    First of all, I want to say that I truly appreciate all the hard work you put into Aerofly FS. The simulator is fantastic, and the recent previews are very promising.

    However, I need to express a serious disappointment regarding the liveries selection.

    It is very surprising — and honestly difficult to understand — that Aerofly FS includes liveries from very small or barely known airlines, yet major international carriers like Air France and Transavia are completely missing.

    These two airlines are not minor companies.

    They are among the most important operators in Europe, and Air France is one of the most recognizable airlines in the world. Not including them feels completely illogical, especially when the aircraft they operate (such as the Boeing 787 and the A320 family) are already in the simulator.

    I respect your work immensely, but at some point this becomes extremely frustrating for players who fly realistically. It breaks immersion and, for many of us, almost ruins the experience — because it simply doesn’t make sense.

    I strongly ask you to please reconsider adding:

    • Air France livery for the Boeing 787, and
    • Transavia livery for the A320/A320neo.

    ‼️‼️‼️☹️☹️☹️

    These are essential airlines, not optional ones.

    Including them would fix a major inconsistency and make the simulator feel complete and coherent.

    Thank you for your attention.

    Best regards,

  • Development Teasers

    I would like to raise an important concern regarding liveries in Aerofly FS.

    Right now, some major international airlines are missing from the simulator, especially Air France and Transavia. These two companies are not only widely recognized worldwide, but they also operate aircraft that are already present in the simulator.

    Because of this, it feels illogical and incomplete to have aircraft like the Boeing 787 or the Airbus A320 family without offering the liveries of such essential European carriers.

    For many players — especially those who fly realistic routes in Europe and France — the absence of these two major airlines breaks immersion and removes a lot of the realism that Aerofly FS aims to deliver.

    I strongly encourage you to consider adding:

    • Air France livery for the Boeing 787
    • Transavia livery for the A320/A320neo


    These additions would greatly enhance the experience for the community and bring more authenticity to the simulator.

    Thank you for your attention.

  • Development Teasers

    TRANSAVIA BROO WTFFFFF MAN

  • Development Teasers

    AIR FRANCE ?????????????????????????????????????

  • Development Teasers

    Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

    The sliders in the menu allow you to set any weight that you want and it's loaded instantly.

    Thanks a lot Jan for the clarification.

    I only meant to ask about a possible link between the new Weight & Fuel menu and future ground features.

    The new system is very detailed (EMPTY, OEW, MTOW, payload sliders, etc.), which made me wonder whether the weight defined in the menu could eventually be physically reflected by ground operations (fuel truck, baggage loaders, passenger boarding, etc.).

    I understand that for now the weight is applied instantly — that part is clear.

    My question was only whether the new weight system was designed in a way that would allow future ground features to load the same values defined in the menu.

    Thanks again for your time and explanations.

  • Development Teasers

    Quote from Necthash

    Yeah, that's alr confirmed..

    Just to clarify what I meant earlier:

    I was referring specifically to the new Fuel & Load menu where we can set the aircraft’s weight (EMPTY, OEW, MTOW, etc.).

    My question was whether this new system is connected to upcoming ground services.

    For example:

    If we set a certain payload or fuel amount in the menu, will the ground vehicles (fuel truck, baggage loaders, passenger boarding, etc.) load the same amount into the aircraft automatically when starting a flight?

    In other words, will the weight we choose in the menu be physically “loaded” into the aircraft by ground services?

  • Development Teasers

    The A380 image showing “EMPTY” and “MTOW” really suggests that a new weight and balance system is coming.

    If that’s the case, it could also mean we’ll finally be able to load passengers, cargo or fuel in a more realistic way.

    Going from an empty aircraft to MTOW implies some kind of dynamic loading — which would be an amazing addition to Aerofly.

    ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️