Posts by poyraz_tr51

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

Every small hint is immediately seen as an announcement and then speculation escalates quickly as history has shown time and time again. Right now we're not seeing much speculations in our forums and instead we see a high number of users writing into the wishlist section.

We're continuing our development on many projects for Aerofly FS of course and we'll announce new features once they are very close to the actual release.

I understand the concern about speculation. That makes sense. But I think many players are simply looking for a small confirmation that development is active and moving forward. Even a general statement like “we are currently working on improvements and new features” once in a while could keep the community excited. Aerofly FS Global has a very passionate player base, and many of us just enjoy following the development of the simulator.

Quote from BoAsp

Yeah, you mean like a sign of life? some kind of devlog?

Yes, exactly. Something like a small devlog, a short message, or even a simple hint about what is currently being worked on. It doesn't have to be a promise or a release date. Just a small sign that development is active and what direction the simulator is going. I think this would make the community much more excited and patient while waiting for the next update.

Quote from BoAsp

I totally agree, but the devs not giving anything until release is better if that makes them more motivated to keep going, I figure getting insanely spammed and even correct me if am wrong probably close to death threats from some kids might make them loose motivation.

My friend, if they just gave us a simple answer like, "We're working on this, it may or may not work," that would be enough for us.

Some time ago it was mentioned that information about future updates is not shared because it can lead to speculation and unnecessary discussions. However, the current situation is actually creating the opposite effect. When there is no information at all, speculation grows even more because the community starts guessing what might be coming next. Most of us are not asking for promises or exact release dates. Even a small hint, a preview, or a simple roadmap about what is currently being worked on would already make the community very happy. Many long-time players have been flying with the same features for a long time now. Naturally people start to lose some excitement when they don’t know if something new is coming or what the future direction of the simulator is. Aerofly FS Global is one of the best mobile flight simulators and the community truly wants to see it grow. Sharing even a small amount of information about future updates would give players hope and something to look forward to. We simply want to stay excited about the future of Aerofly FS Global.

Quote from AeRodri

IMHO it can perfectly be done for all Desktop Simulators, not sure about mobile phones though...

In RFS, even the image of houses is reflected in the water, and it doesn't affect device performance.

Yesterday I landed at Vuscat airport and shut down the aircraft. Today I continued where I left off and prepared the aircraft for flight. However, I was only able to taxi the aircraft by setting the thrust to 35%. Even with the brakes not engaged, the plane was having difficulty moving. I managed to regain takeoff speed and took off, after which the "BRK HOT" light came on. The problem doesn't end there. Even when I engage the parking brake during landing, the plane still moves on slightly inclined surfaces. It's as if the brakes are disengaged.

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

We usually only delete stuff that has been reported before. This is nothing personal, just to keep the forums somewhat readable.

Yes, I agree with you, but you haven't given us a positive or negative response. Respond and do whatever you want with the letter; it doesn't matter.

Quote from poyraz_tr51

My previous post about the gamepad throttle not being able to return quickly to idle was removed by a moderator. Honestly, this is frustrating and disappointing. This was a legitimate bug report that directly affects aircraft control and realism in Aerofly FS Global. Removing posts that report real issues does not solve the problem and does not help the community. If there was a specific reason for deleting the post, it should be clearly explained. Otherwise, it gives the impression that valid feedback is simply being removed instead of being addressed. I am reporting a real control issue that affects the simulator experience. I expect transparency from the moderation team and I hope this problem will actually be looked at instead of being ignored.

If you tell me this problem was reported to me beforehand, you're wrong. Because you didn't give any answer as to whether the problem would be resolved, positively or negatively.

My previous post about the gamepad throttle not being able to return quickly to idle was removed by a moderator. Honestly, this is frustrating and disappointing. This was a legitimate bug report that directly affects aircraft control and realism in Aerofly FS Global. Removing posts that report real issues does not solve the problem and does not help the community. If there was a specific reason for deleting the post, it should be clearly explained. Otherwise, it gives the impression that valid feedback is simply being removed instead of being addressed. I am reporting a real control issue that affects the simulator experience. I expect transparency from the moderation team and I hope this problem will actually be looked at instead of being ignored.

Quote from Small Planes

You're not thinking of this setting, are you?

Although there's a turbulence setting in the Settings section, it's a useless setting. Because increasing that setting will cause constant turbulence. It will always have to be adjusted manually. This is ridiculous. They still haven't brought any real weather conditions to this simulation. Keep using those junk planes, you iPACS teams!

Hello IPACS, the newly constructed runway 06R-24L (ICAO code LTFJ) at Istanbul Sabiha Gökçen Airport, which has been in use for almost a year, is not available on Aerofly. Could you add this newly constructed runway? It appears as ground on Aerofly.

Quote from Ichirou

Just to add:

This issue is still happening as of 19/02/2026.

It’s pretty frustrating because it completely breaks long-haul logbook tracking. Even without exiting the sim and without the blue loading screen appearing, the flight still gets fragmented into multiple entries.

Before version 4.08.01.14 (2026-02-05) this never happened to me.

Really hope this can be looked into and fixed soon, since it makes proper flight logging almost impossible on longer flights.

I haven't encountered this error. I use an iPad. I don't know if it's different on Android devices. This problem usually occurs if you change the plane's location on the map.

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

Normally you don't even need the parking brake to stay put, that's why a slope is needed to get the plane to roll without thrust.

I'll investigate, probably has to do with not switching to the alternate braking correctly.

Jan, I completely shut down the plane yesterday because SEQM airport doesn't have a "cold and dark" feature. Now I've prepared the plane to continue where I left off. However, even with the APU engaged, the pushback vehicle couldn't move the aircraft. I started the engines, and only then did it push the plane.

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

Normally you don't even need the parking brake to stay put, that's why a slope is needed to get the plane to roll without thrust.

I'll investigate, probably has to do with not switching to the alternate braking correctly.

Do you know what's really strange, Jan? When I activate the parking brake, the wheels move, but when I deactivate it, the wheels stop. This problem occurs after the flight, that is, after landing. And this problem didn't just appear now. I saw this problem 4-5 months ago, but I assumed you were aware of it and didn't feel the need to post about it on the forum. I'd also like to add that this problem doesn't occur at every airport. It happens in places where the plane is moving freely in "idle" mode. So, I think there's a slope involved. But the parking brake should prevent this.

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

Which airport was this? Does it have a significant slope on the apron?

Even with an incline, can't the parking brake stop the plane? Quito Airport. ICAO: SEQM

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

Thank you, I haven't been able to reproduce this yet, in which order did you shut off the engines and did you have the APU running or not?

I turned off engine 1 first, then engine 2. Yes, the APU was active.

Hello IPACS Team,

I would like to report a potential issue regarding the A321.

After landing and taxiing to the gate, when I set the parking brake, the aircraft continues to roll forward even though both engines are shut down and there is zero thrust. There is no N1/N2 indication or residual thrust, yet the aircraft still moves with the parking brake engaged.

Interestingly, when I release the parking brake again, the aircraft then remains completely stationary and does not move at all.

This behavior seems physically incorrect, as the aircraft should remain fully stopped when the parking brake is set, especially with engines off and no external forces applied.

I am not sure if this issue is specific to the A321 or affects other aircraft as well, but I have observed it on the A321 so far.

Thank you for your time and support.

Best regards.

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

You can change the runway by changing the selected arrival/approach in the MCDU, just like in the real aircraft.

It doesn't work; the runway direction doesn't change when I make a selection. I only tried this on the A321.

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

And why would that be?

What's the error that you're seeing because we haven't changed anything and last time I checked it worked.

In real-world conditions, if there's a tailwind at the arrival airport, I need to change the runway direction, and this isn't something I can select via MCDU.

Quote from Jet-Pack (IPACS)

What do you mean by edit airport?

For example, runway changes are not possible.