Posts by SilentObserver OnlyEmojis

    Buying the more expensive device might seem outrageously self indulgent and an unwise allocation of finances which the vast majority of us have to balance with prudence. Naturally all of us have to live within our means.
    The money that I put into iPad pros means money saved to me, as they remain functional at the highest level for many years out lasting less expensive devices by a time factor significantly greater than their cost difference. My current one is approaching five years old and so far I am not aware of any performance pressure to replace it.

    It has ended up saving me a significant amount of money over buying less expensive tablets that do not do the job after a much shorter time and which need multiple replacements in the frustrating face of rapidly encroaching underperformance.

    The less expensive only in the short term devices as well as costing more over the longer period only underperform and immediately disappoint. We have see exasperating posts where an angry user might rail at length that his brand new but bottom of the range device cynically made up from a bin of obsolete parts giving predictably mediocre performance naturally ought to be the universal bench mark that all new advanced features are set against. Unfortunately the implication is that no one else should enjoy improvements offered to performance standards that his gleaming new tortoise cannot match.

    A considered investment in seemingly over indulgent devices actually pays off over the years and as well as turning out to be better value for money they give truly sparkling performance in their youth and entertain and excite more than a succession of lower priced, lower value for money and lower delivering devices ever will.

    A dear device is not a flamboyant luxury, it is a present that in real terms keeps on giving.

    Well written, but not everyone has the money for it. And personally, I would never buy an iOS device! Trees aren't everything in life. I can live with some compromises.

    What's so funny about that? I know it's for +/- and for a blank space, but why would anyone need that function right now? You probably think you're very clever and funny 🤦 Instead of laughing stupidly, you could give a suitable reply. But that's probably where your intelligence ends 🤷

    I also didn't notice any significant difference in this brightness setting in the planes' cockpit during the day. I did some tests with the Boeing 787-10 at some airports during the day by adjusting this configuration at different levels and did not identify any change in the brightness of the plane's cockpit. In this two screenshots below I adjusted this brightness to both the minimum and the maximum level and it didn't make any difference. It was as if the brightness remained the same regardless of the adjustment in this brightness setting inside the aircraft during the day.

    Yes, I also tried various settings without any noticeable difference, even with the aircraft lights activated. The slider for the night settings is very good, though 👍But I need to reduce the brightness a bit in my screenshot; it's still too bright.

    You're coming of a lil rude, don't you think Sir?...ohh how mighty and holy you are and knoweth all , we must bow before theee.. it's my opinion and if you don't like it then we'll don't bother responding especially with a spiteful comment , of course illd like other features and planes and their other pressing issues but it's my suggestion not yours, soo f off

    I stand by my point; considering there are many other important things to improve, the desire for changes to the user interface is an unimportant one. This has nothing to do with u After so many years, I know the simulator's strengths and weaknesses very well; the user interface is definitely not one of the important things that needs changing. Dive deep into the simulation and you'll understand what I mean. Furthermore, I'm not being rude, because that would sound different.I'm Bavarian and Franconian! We're very direct in our expressions, not everyone understands that 😉

    I completely disagree with this idea of fixing a bug and only releasing the fix 5 or 6 months later, like the one involving the high rate of descent on Airbus planes. This type of problem greatly disrupts the user's flight experience, and this type of flaw almost necessarily requires a quick fix, as well as a quick release of the fix. Soon they'll fix bugs and release the patch only in 12 months😂😂😂😂

    One simply has to accept it and draw one's own conclusions. There's nothing more to say about it.

    Ever since Aerofly 1 we've had the same UI and I donno if it's just me but it's starting to grow old, maybe a refreshing look won't be soo bad, right now it looks a bit messy and as though most of the buttons are trying to be fitted onto the same screen, maybe a ui where you can slide to the next screen and things like the aircraft button can be displayed as pics, which you can tap on, just a suggestion

    Yes, the user interface is really, really important; the simulator stands or falls on it. Everything else is completely irrelevant. A completely ridiculous post...

    No it's not. It has been fixed internally even before the major update 4-5 months ago and even before users reported it. But there just has not been an update yet which included this fix. We're working on a major update but it's not fully finished yet, so this small bug fix is automatically going to roll out with many many other changes once that large update is rolled out.

    Instead of assuming things it would be much more helpful to provide us with a situation that we can reproduce. That means we need to know the exact device, the exact route, what aircraft and what was in control of the aircraft, i.e. copilot or autopilot.

    If I pay for a product for a whole year and only get full service for what feels like two-thirds of the year, shouldn't I be disappointed? Sold as seen, right? Anyway, December 5th...

    This bug has been reported since June or July, and we're already halfway through November and nothing has been done to fix it. We've been reporting this flaw for 5 months now. There seems to be a clear lack of interest in correcting this annoying bug.

    The main thing is that the numbers in the navigation menu are a different color; it's getting annoying that old bugs still haven't been fixed. I feel ignored now, but they gladly accept our money...

    Obviously, everyone can express their opinion here, express their most secret desires, since this is a forum. But I beg you, in the name of the remaining common sense: Wouldn't it be better if Aerofly remained a flight simulator instead of an airport simulator?

    Despite the few vehicles, it remains a flight simulator. Nobody wants to turn Aerofly into an airport simulator. They're exaggerating a bit. The point is to make the apron a little more lively.

    I think you should think on a slightly smaller scale, as you will suggest. At least 5 years will pass, and that's a generous estimate.