Posts by Razy

    Hello, I would like to report an old problem with the shared FMCs for A380/A350. I do long-haul flights with them and I've been having problems on the CSTR page, both for altitude and speed. Sometimes some charts require altitudes/speeds that are incompatible with the pre-set values in the game… (It's simply impossible to change or impose restrictions!)

    The same thing happens with the TA, especially when it goes to the APPR page. For example: OTHH TA = 13000ft, the FMC shows 7000ft, then when you try to change it, it bugs out and goes to 5000FT and stays fixes!!

    That's all regarding Airbus. If possible, I await your reply or even just a simple reaction lol, Thanks!!:P

    I will probably upload my content to GitHub, but that will take a while.

    KAI TAK also needs revision. On the one hand, I still have to conceal surfaces, on the other hand, I would like to add passenger boarding bridges, taxi signs and ground text.

    Wow, simply incredible, great work! I'm just sad that there's no way for iOS to download external files and add them to the game to create this beauty, unless the game itself allows these modifications like in Simple Plane (I don't know if you're familiar with it) and Really cool, I liked it!!

    Hey ipacs, could you add some way to add the Kai Tak airport!? Unfortunately, to add it, there are only mods, and it's impossible on iOS, and this is one of my favorite airports, I think it's one of the favorites of many other people in the community too!! (I just want this iconic airport for our happiness 😔)





    Hi, I've had the global map for almost 9 months, and I've noticed that central Europe seems to be the focus of the game, which is cool. However, one airport there catches my attention because it's less developed compared to its neighbors (FRA, CDG, AMS...). I'm referring to LUX airport. I mention this mainly because it's a major cargo hub and the main hub for Cargolux/Luxair…

    Luxembourg becomes the 6th largest cargo hub in the EU, with growth of 8.2%!!

    Building the -200 would take many months because the entire cockpit would have to be redone from scratch. I don't see this as a viable option, it's too much work. If we were to invest this much time we're already half way to a brand new aircraft.

    The 747-8 has entirely new wings and engines, this also would take months, though a bit less than the cockpit. It can be done but it's still a lot of work.

    Something that would be much easier actually is a 747-400F.

    Saying that is like showing candy to a child, that alone is reason enough for a nation to celebrate excessive happiness. (Please make some versions with a small hump like the -200 ones and others without, it's so cool to vary lol)

    I think it would be cool to add the B747-200/f, B747sp or B747-8i/f. The B747 is one of the aircraft that has been grounded for a long time. Among the commercial aircraft that arrived were several from the A320 family, B737, B777F and B787-9, but the B747... I think it would be cool to revive something of this iconic aircraft as well!!
    -200:



    -8:




    Sp:


    Hello!
    I was practicing landings with the Concorde with heavier loads... when I noticed that when flared and reducing throttle, the nose rises more than expected, causing the rate of descent to either become zero or positive, consequently using much more runway beyond the aim point!

    Would this be due to aircraft, or is it because adding weight significantly changes the CG?

    I was wondering if it would be possible to add an additional button to the menu that activates and deactivates the trim function. It would have the option to raise and lower the trim, since sometimes it's very inconvenient to tilt the camera on the phone to adjust the trim.

    Sometimes when I increase the trim, the aircraft simply moves the control stick, which is disruptive.

    AIs it possible to start the aircraft in cold and dark conditions, taxi to the catapult, and launch without having to open the location menu and select launch mode?

    👋Hi, I was here in my bed, thinking about how good it would be to add Airways!
    • Airways are designed to allow short, medium, and especially long-distance routes to be completed in both FMC/MCDU and the game's route page in a short amount of time.
    • This would greatly help those who take long flights (for example) because it eliminates the need to enter thousands of waypoints/VORs.
    (I remember when I was doing Doha to Hong Kong on B777F using Simbrief and I had to input all the waypoints/VORs, that's so 🫩)


    For exemple NATS OTS Airway is using for connect Central and North América/Europe, Africa and Asia!

    Just this, and thank you, have a good day!!

    Hi, I actually once commented on the possible addition of the A300 or A310 (also the B767, B757, DC3, or some other cargo aircraft), which are iconic aircraft in aviation history, like the DC3 or the B767, which was the first twin-engine ETOPS to cross the ocean. However, they said it was irrelevant and wouldn't generate profit. After that, they added the ME262, which never generates much value. They forgot about the Rnav and weather bugs, as you mentioned. Thank you for the kind words. The community needs more critical thinkers for the success of this game!