Posts by delfinpm

    Hola Colin

    Good work (And I guess quite laborious for modeling).

    You will allow me, however, a small objection. It is not a criticism, nor is it my intention that you feel annoyed, on the contrary, I feel for your work a real admiration among other reasons, because you are providing this Sim., A true wealth, a true collection of magnificent airports located in addition, in places that I consider very strategic in the ... "old continent = Europe".

    This is my "TIP": I suppose it will not be very difficult for you (now or in a future update), to improve the color of almost all the airport buildings, specifically the terminals. Virtually all of them have a "sand" color like the entire surface surrounding those buildings. They also have a good part of them, the same color on the ceiling, as on the vertical walls of the building itself. The consequence is that they are not very visible, they camouflggage with the ground. It would be convenient to put more colorful, more cheerful colors; That color of desert sand makes them sad, in addition, in a place of enormous tourist activity.

    I repeat Colin, it is not a criticism, it is a suggestion so that this magnificent work of yours shines more in that beautiful latitude.

    Kind regards: Delfin



    I'm not a forum moderator, I'm an active member of the IPACS development team. We are too busy to be sitting here on the forum watching every single post that comes by. Would you rather have us sit here on the forums all of the time or work to finish up some new features and functionalities? I do feel that this thread is getting out of hand and will handle it accordingly.

    Hola Jeff, and Forum partners

    In the icon of the Forum, you figure as a moderator; However, I had already assumed that you did not develop this function, otherwise, you would have closed more than one thread that each step is more frequently exceeded in expressing the demands.

    I personally prefer that you are "creating and improving FS 2 features". I am convinced that in that position, the members of the Forum will win with more benefits of the Sim.

    Also, remembering now and if the memory fails, I think we owe you, I do not know if in its entirety, or a good participation, one of the most beautiful areas of this Sim: "the Florida peninsula". An absolutely beautiful region, with a huge population bordered by water, and water and more water. I did not know that millions of people lived almost on water, and with such a paradisiacal environment, especially for its enviable temperature.

    Thank you for your participation and also for clarifying this point. I want you to work hard (we need it) although I already know that you all work to the limit, although this aspect not everyone understands. It surprises me that with a fairly general character, people ask and ask and ... demand, as if you were napping every day in the afternoon. Well, do you know what (siesta) "nap" is? . I do not know how this word will be translated into English, it will surely be identical to Spanish , since it is a creation of our language.

    In short, business activity, production, productivity, Industrial Organization, Methods and Times, I could speak a lot, but this Forum is not the best place, nor do I think that the immense majority of the members are interested in what least. Of course, if they knew a little more about this discipline and productivity of the company, they would not be so repetitive with the demands.

    In private companies, you work hard, and you don't need to rush it, they (the management) know what rush is, they know what productivity is, and ... or they offer us a good product, competitive in performance and price, or ... will be cornered and put out of circulation by the competition. This is how the private company works, this is how it has to work (and IPACS works!), Otherwise, its end would be very close, which I deeply hope and wish, that this does not happen, for the benefit of this `EXTRAORDINARY SIMULATOR! , consequently, from us your clients and members of this beloved Forum.

    Anyway Jeff, maybe I went too far, I apologize to those who believe it, however, the world of private business works like this: in a hurry, with speed and with pressure at work. Perhaps the state officials do not know it well, but those of us who are part of the private company (with an entrepreneurial mind) know this accelerated and constant rhythm well.

    Fundamentally for this reason, I have never rushed my requests, except immediately that I was part of the Forum. Then I made a brief exposition of what then seemed very serious to me: "the color of the water of the Sim". And ... it's still so ... ugly. Well, it is hard for me to accept it, but I understand that if you have not improved this aspect of the simulator, it is because you have other tasks that you consider more important, and logically, you will give priority to what is priority (naturally: from your point of view; and that point by sight, it is ... irrefutable).

    Without further ado.

    Kind regards: Delfin

    I'm still here Delfin. Just focusing more on moving us forward than dealing with nonsense

    Good morning Jeff

    I know you're there, but I don't think you're as an "active moderator".

    Currently on some threads (and specifically this one), it became annoying, unacceptable. It cannot be repeated and reiterated until exhaustion. Literature and more literature that leads to nothing, except the fatigue of always reading the same thing and always answering the same thing.

    My reference to you, was simply so that you cut the course of that thread, that more than achieving something positive, what it does is create annoyance to those who use reason and intelligence in the resolution of the demands made to IPACS.

    Kind regards: Delfin

    Dear colleagues:

    It is evident that we have entered into a dialectical battle of demands towards IPACS, which is leading us nowhere, except to confrontation between us members of this Forum, and this is detrimental to us.

    IPACS cannot resolve our demands as quickly as we request; Furthermore, these demands are many and quite complex. In my opinion for lack of programmers, and that I suppose is not easy to solve. The management knows our demands, if we are not pleased, it is because they cannot do it, and as much as you reiterate, it will not be achieved with the agility that is demanded.

    Lately also, the personal insult has already been reached, and that is even worse. Good reasons have been put forward by competent partners, but when we stumble, the arguments have no effect. I think that new members have arrived today in a very radical attitude that does not benefit the intellectual health of this community.

    I am almost missing Jeff, these threads, I think they must be cut before the requests become so insistent, so virulent. If IPACS does not please us, it is simply because it is impossible for them. Those who do not understand it, I think I should leave this peaceful Forum. We do not need so much belligerence in our demands, they are well known.

    I do not wish to disturb anyone, but I consider this repeated insistence ABSOLUTELY UNACCEPTABLE. This is simply my point of view.

    Kind regards: Delfin

    This image reflects the work of 4 artists: Schnuffelduffel, IZOJUB ,Brunnobellic and TomSimMuc

    You are formidable, great luck to have met you (even if it is only virtually)

    Kind regards: Delfin

    Good morning, Michael

    It is the first time that a member of this Forum not only solves my difficulty, but also does so in bilingual: English and my own language (Spanis). Yes Michael, you are the first with me, to take this initiative. This especially shows your correctness in human treatment, and your sensitivity.

    For all this, thank you, thank you, doubly thank you. This is the best community I have ever known. As it is said in my language: "sois formidables"= "you are formidable!". Formidable and decisive.

    Kind regards: Delfin


    Hello IZOJUB (Michael)

    I have installed your cultivation of the Balearic Islands, and I am especially interested in the IBIZa island together with the Burnnobellic airport.

    The image shows the cultivation of the buildings, but have you not cultivated the soil? If yes, where to find it?

    Previously I isolated the mesh: "ES-Baleares20" from TomSimMuc in:

    Dcuments \ Aerofly fs2 \ Scenery \ elevation \ Es-Baleares20

    With this installation of the TomSimMuc mesh in the indicated folder, the computer crashes while loading the "location". It occurred to me to copy the mesh in the same folder of your Cultivation and it works, but with the resolution that you can see in the image.

    Thank you for your work.

    Kind regards: Delfin

    Hi stochmal

    First of all, welcome to this Forum

    Second, if it is not too much to ask: could you upload a video (even a short one) in this Forum in which we can see, what I think you say can be seen? I await it with real interest.

    If what I am thinking is true, I think you would bring a real revolution to this Simulator.

    I am looking forward to that new contribution of yours.

    Kind regards: Delfin

    Hola Thomas y Peter

    You had told me Peter, that Hawaii had a high density of information. It did not seem so since most of the surface does not have buildings.

    Well, for information density we have Manhattan; I do not think that there exists in this Sim, any area with more buildings and, consequently, greater density of information. Well, there, my Sim flies without the slightest difficulty, and in any other region.

    However, since you two, Thomas and you, are the only ones who are fighting to solve this difficulty, and also in a very intense and constant way (something that I thank you very especially), I also tried to help with reasoning broader, although less precise, due to my ignorance of that programming.

    After going around and around: Why is it only possible for me to take off from Port Allen, fly a short period of time, and ... crash. ? What is special about this airport over the others, in which I can do absolutely nothing ?. This is really amazing!

    Well ... going back to your reasoning Peter: remember that I decreased the resolution from "high to medium", and it remained the same. And ... why not decrease to "low"?   Peter could be right.

    So I did and ... I was amazed: Peter was right !!. It works perfectly at all airports, and also with reasonable good resolution.

    Well comrades, very well fought friends, I am very, very grateful. You deserve a hug (well, I give you a virtual hug).

    Kind regard: Delfin

    Hola Thomas

    Deleted all 7 folders, and after 3 flight attempts over the island, exactly the same results; I only fly on the Runway "Port Alen" less than half a minute. Then it crashes. In short: nothing changes

    Regards: Delfin

    I have always flown in OpenGL. On one occasion I have switched to Vulkan and it gave me a problem that I do not remember now.

    My limit frame rate = 120 fps.

    Regards: Delfin

    Again: hola Peter

    I have just finished a test based on what you affirm (which is not crazy: that VRAM could influence this anomaly).

    I lowered the resolution from Graphics quality: "high to medium". I re-tested the island with identical results as before lowering the resolution. This test I consider quite conclusive. You may be right, but in this case, I find it hard to believe that this problem is caused by the VRAM of only 2 GB.

    Anyway, Peter, I appreciate the effort of your analysis and exposition

    Kind regards: Delfin