You could write an entire book on this, but you probably won't get it for years to come. It's actually pointless to discuss it. We won't get it that quickly, it will take years.
I know sir. I’m doing it for the love of the game🫡
Posts by Fab001
-
-
Expensive and useless
Indeed, it’s expensive in infinite flight and it also doesn’t really teach you how to communicate in reallife, however why are yall so against a multiplayer combined with atc? Just because infinite flight and Xplane does it that way doesn’t mean that aerofly has to copy them? Aerolfy is way more advanced and I see a great opportunity for them to implement a Vatsim like network. Of course, single player would remain. Nothing speaks against that, really except for the fact that Ipacs should focus on other features first (which I totally agree on)
-
Aerofly is a FLIGHT-simulator, not a navigation or communication simulator.
Indeed, and communication as well as navigation is part of flying lol
-
I don't need a multiplayer or Vatsim.
Crazy how many people don’t want one of the biggest parts in aviation in aerofly. The three biggest parts are „fly, navigate, communicate“. We already have two of them, so I don’t know why you would not want the third as well. Furthermore, aviation is a passion that connects people so multiplayer would be a great possibility to get a more connected community.
And now let’s come to the economic part: Multiplayer and atc are the top 1 requested features on this forum so this isn’t only my opinion but the opinion of the most. This essentially also leads to me claiming that multiplayer will probably increase the sales by a lot. If it’s only included in a packet it would even generate more money for the devs. And again, money allows them to develop more content.In the end, everybody’s opinion differs, as it shows but am just speaking for the most of us
-
No actually, it is rash to declare what we all agree on.
It’s more like wording than meaning it literally lol
-
Yes, the next 10 years will definitely be very exciting, then I will be how old 🤔
Fr lol and am already flying on Vatsim but I do love Aerolfy
-
We all agree, that we want to see a Vatsim-like integrated multiplayer in Aerofly, right? Communication with REAL people on REAL frequencies with REAL procedures. This is all I’m looking for. If multiplayer eventually releases and this isn’t the focus, we could build an atc community around it that’s why I’ve created a discord server about exactly this topic: https://discord.gg/WdxYCvEzJa
-
Same story applies to me:)
-
Hello IPACS, could you please add more liveries for the A320, like in the example pictures I attached? Thank you
That photo of the Corendon A320 was taken at Hamburg Airport right? I know my home base!
-
I was playing this on my tablet last night with the TV going in the background. I took off from San Carlos, headed up over San Francisco airport, the South Industrial hills, down over San Francisco city and out over Alcatraz to some of the heavily populated areas on the North shore before swinging back south to Half Moon bay and beyond. I then went East and back up the bay to land at KSFO. This sim is just phenomenal! The scenery owes nothing to anything else, it is just brilliant. My only complaint though is that it is so dead on the ground. No cars or trains, nothing to show how alive and vibrant our world is. I know the team is small, and it would probably be impossible to get these features in the Android version, but will they ever be in the PC one? I would cheerfully pay a lot for that sort of add on. Loving the sim.
I feel like moving lights at night time would really change the atmosphere. So it doesn’t even have to be 3d models or so
And another thing that could change the general aliveness would be having the ai planes light up at night. Navigation lights at least -
The best option is to focus on both.
I disagree if they don’t have the capacity to focus on both. But this all is just speculations
-
I think that they will taking a break from the A350 and focusing on new aircrafts.
I hope they don’t focus on new aircrafts, instead they work on systems🙏
-
-
Directs are also very important!
-
On the picture there’s a 787-9 but in fact they’ve ordered a 787-10 which is already flying test flights. Here’s a correct picture of it.
-
There’s a new airline operating the 787-10 which is Angola Airlines. I’d love to see that ingame:)
-
What do y'all use to plan your flights in Aerofly FS?
I use Simbrief but you have to keep in mind that aerofly uses outdated airacks so often it can’t find the waypoints I receive via simbrief.
-
Not sure if I'm just stupid, but when I try adding my own custom waypoints (since there are no airways) into the route discontinuity, I can only add 1, anything more and I get an invalid entry error message, however if I go back to the menu and to the navigation page, I can add more waypoints from there...what's going on?
Where did you get the custom waypoints from? They may not work because the airrack of aerofly is outdated. Maybe this is just a coincidence, try another route with more waypoints.
-
-
I haven’t requested Nuuk airport until now because in Aerofly there was no aircraft that operated there frequently. But now, with the addition of the B738 we do have one airline actually called „Jettime“, a danish airline operation from Copenhagen. So with that post I request the addition of Nuuk International Airport and the jettime livery. Additionally, we have to address the importance of this airport: Many airlines use this airport as an alternative in case of an emergency while flying transatlantic. It’s also the biggest and most famous airport of Greenland connecting this region to Denmark and Europe. Greenland is also just a very interesting place to fly to, especially in a flight sim:)
