Level 14 are still 1000+ files
Level 9, 11,12,13 and 14 still give 1360 ttc files. Sometimes I have the feeling it take longer than 2.5 hrs
Level 14 are still 1000+ files
Level 9, 11,12,13 and 14 still give 1360 ttc files. Sometimes I have the feeling it take longer than 2.5 hrs
Give us early access - i think in this community is going to be acceptable for a pay for EA model
I put "Write Raw Files" to "No", but with the setting "Write Images with Mask" I'm not certain. What does it mean? When do I need masks?
Awesome question - i was in this moment about to ask the same. I have it ON at the moment
If i recall right my memory, the re center button is on the left touch controller. Since i don't use them to fly, i am not sure, but worth for a try.
Display MoreYesterday early night I got a new AFS2 OB-update via Steam, and the first I've tested was the - so called - "not changed flight model" of IPACS's Robinson R22 (--> look at Jet-Pack's statement above).
Well, what should I say, and it makes me even sad :
- still the same crazy easy flight behaviour during - so called - Professional Mode (it's the only mode I'm flying this little bird).
- still able to land on the craziest spots I choose during flight, with almost no struggeling and only little corrections imput in comparison to my main experiences, and before the latest two OB-updates.
- E.g. this special previous "vivid translational lift effect" has almost gone; which was soooo unique compared to all the other iterations in various other flight-sims.
- discovered myself to get even bored while flying because it has become so easy to fly. Current - so called "not changed" - flight model strongly reminds me on the various helos I can find in FSX/P3D - or better - X-Plane.
Résumé: They've cut down the feathers of a former interesting and vivid bird.
If "disarming" difficult to handle aircraft simulations is some kind of new policy within IPACS, the will loose me as a previous faithful customer (since the beginnings of AFS) in an instant and finally.
This issue is something which not only makes me sad but angry too .
Cheers and all the best.
Hi
Thanks for bringing this up. I doubt that we are going to see the full fidelity R22 nor the Ecureuill AS350B3 which I have flown on the weekend with the Professional Aerofly FS2 code base. I know the colleagues very well who did the metering on the real bird, for both, the R22 and the AS350.
I suggested them to put the AS350 on sale as DLC. No chance, not because they don‘t want, but one reason is Airbus not releasing the license like Robinson did. Besides this the metering flights costed a fortune, and due to this, they sell these two highly realistic flight models only with the Level-D AFS2 platform.
Besides all this, it needs to be scalable in terms of earnings. While the mobile AFS sells like a butterbread, the desktop version ice a niche market. The Pro market has just started. EASA is not yet able to issue level D approval as there is a little gap in the rules. Silly as it sounds, the screen distance between pilot eye and screen is regulated. As you can imagine VR Headset does not have the distance. This is an issue and has to pass all kind of certifications now.
I am hoping to get an AS350B3 at the level of the current R22. This would be genius. But to keep the expectations as they are from my talks on the Helico Weekend with my colleagues, not going to happen before EASA certification is finished, as this is a MUST for the pro platform and without this, no market. So that where the focus is and of course where the funding is coming from, the mobile platform.
I. an understand them, although I am not happy for my own preference.
Btw, the AS350B3 was really ultra realistic. I flown the real one and the one in sim. Fantastic work. Maybe one day ...
Although the DCS F/A-18 has more realistic avionics etc. the Aerofly version is much more immersive (mainly due to the better graphics) and more fun to fly IMO.
What!?
Don't use steam
Are you going to share them on Flight-Sim.org, to see what it looks like?
Share DCS content?
A little question, why dont you play DCS with the f18 module?
I mean it is the most realistic f18 you will get in a sim and you can perform realistic with it?
Don't worry - DCS F18 and the upcomign Viper are probably the most realistic sims out there, for these aircrafts. But. I love to fly around the Swiss Alps. I created a Meiringen and Payerne scenery in DCS, but it is not Switzerland
Maybe just add it to the Cessna and provide two options in the aircraft selection screen, C172 with GNS and C172 with standard moving map.
I also don't think that implementing the GNS makes the aircraft less accessible to casual or new players.
Why no use the R22 "pro" or non pro checkbox?
I have done some cultivaton of Corse recently. i noticed that the Geofabrik pbf contain much more forrest data than I like to have. I clutters the small bushes as trees all over the place. I was wondering if there is a way to do two pieces in scen proce.
1 Lights & Houses
2. Forrests
I noticed that the combined size, by removing the trees can reduce from 1GB to 100MB
Give it to me for the long weekend starting tomorrow!
Could one post the entire file, please. Thanks
Austrian OE-LGP is now available for download. Austrian operated several routes in Europe from Zurich with this aircraft on behalf of SWISS.
How difficult would it be to flatten a few airports runway, taxiway and apron for me?
LSMP
LSGN
GCTS
GCXO
GCGM
Hi
Is anyone out there that could create a 10m mesh usable for AFS2 out of the SRTM data? I tried. I cannot. Must be too dumb for it.
Would appreciate it. Thanks
Use Best Angle of Climb speed for obstacles for sure, 71 kts, which is the same as Vr in the Duchess. But, then lower the nose and hold Best Rate when all cleaned up.
You can check the flight review at Avsim.com for the Just Flight Duchess 76 for AFS2. There are some printable tables with V speeds in the review.
Nice find - thanks
Can one try to cultivate Kenya around Mount Kenya. All i get is forest. No houses
My cultivation file i tried is attached. trees around the mt kenya lodge would show. but non of the rest does show up - giving up
One remark here for all - If you download Grid 9 and grid 13, you got to dow the work in both tile sets- this is how i screwed my Norway images
I used grid 13, ZL18 for the airports, grid 13, ZL17 for the Islands and in the end grid 9 for the whole area. I edited only Grid 9
Coastlines screwed
Ok. I firgured our the following
Switzerland Scenery contains Ortho for these levels.
9
11
12
13
14
So, if one generates a new Ortho, by maintaining these levels, it should be fine and no patch loading.
I have loaded now the tile from Svolvaer, ZL16, AFS 9,11,12,13,14. Everything is perfectly running.
1297 geocoverted files
2019-05-24 16:15:48 (INFO) AeroScenery - Starting GeoConvert Process
2019-05-24 16:15:48 (INFO) AeroScenery - Working on AFS Grid Square 1 of 1
2019-05-24 16:15:48 (INFO) AeroScenery - Running GeoConvert
2019-05-24 19:32:55 (INFO) AeroScenery - Grid square map_09_8a00_c280 selected
Size for this tile is 460MB. Quite comfortable.
I tested with the Ortho from flight-sim.org Tenerife. It does not contain Level 9, it does contain 10 to 13. If you are in GCTS, the Teide, the center of the island is not rendered. For me a clear indicator that we need to have always AFS 9