Which devices? I have the latest iPad Pro. I don’t get trees.
It is not currently online on mobile devices.
Posts by xiagua
-
-
Without dynamic weight it doesn’t seem worth doing.
I think some shortened variants of the aircraft are better worth having than the cargo version.
-
Hello, would it be easy to implement the cargo versions of the A321 and A320? I assume all that would need to be changed would be the cargo doors, windows, and liveries. Please correct me if I am wrong. It would be cool to see these cargo versions.
I don't remember them having a freight version in the real world.But I think adding cargo versions for 747/777 aircraft is It seems feasible.
-
I get pot plants in several airports, there is a wing of SFO airport with plenty of them. (M1 iPad pro)
But they seem to be few in number,Not as much as FS4.One day in the future, trees on FS4 should also appear on FSG.
-
Trees are only available on more powerful devices.
Hello,I've turned the picture up to super high,And used Vulkan Renderer,But why are there still no trees like FS4?（No trees but have buildings,Or has it not joined AFG yet,And add it in the near future?）
-
Trees are not a good suggestion, at least for 95% of devices. One of the best ways for aerofly to develop in mobile devices is to add new and more complex features with the birth of new mobile device hardware. This requires more time, blindly adding more features may cause some devices to crash. Google has strengthened its monitoring of application operation. For applications that frequently crash, they will reduce the display frequency of the application in Google Play, or even delete the application. This is catastrophic for IPACS,
How was it howif it is an optional option in the settings?
-
Today's top gear is ordinary in two years.
I use an Android 11 device from 3 years ago.But it can run AeroflyFS Global perfectly at the highest quality.
-
Don't make a wish here, developing a new feature requires much more complex considerations than you imagine. You may not even know the performance limitations of your device, but when your mobile device can connect to Intel CPUs and NVIDIA graphics cards and has better cooling methods, let's talk about these things. There are not only high-end mobile device players here, but also mid to low end device players. If IPACS only serves high-end devices, who will guarantee sales? Are a very small number of high-end device players willing to pay wages for the energy, time, and money invested in certain devices alone?
But there are many pc -side FS4 players.As for Mobile device, which is preferably an option in Settings.It Distant may come true one day in the future.
-
I hope this flight simulator will incorporate dynamic water and tire smoke in the future.
-
How many points do you all have on Aerofly?
When you uninstall and reinstall it, it will return to zero.It can't sync to your Google account.It's just disposable,Therefore, I think there is no substantive significance in comparing this at present.
-
Wow!It's It's finally here.
-
A week has passed, and I suspect significant Some progress has been made on this project.
-
3rd Rock from the Sun
It seems,IPACS should make all the big airports on this rock 3D as soon as possible.
-
Please let us decide this for ourselves. We are working on many things behind the scenes and you don't know the priority we have set.
Hello, will there be any SIM FEATURES released this year besides Livery, airplanes and airports?
-
-
If you add multiplayer games, then IPACS will sacrifice as much as IF. The first is the impact of lower performance, higher prices, and the inability of officials to focus on other projects. Therefore, multiplayer games will not appear in AeroflyFS anytime soon.I think Maybe Compared with multiplayer games, weather systems, ground services, physical effects and other aspects need to be improved first.
-
I would love if they added more planes and have multiplayer that would be great
That may be a vevy long time from now,Maybe after 2030.
-
I think we shld make it so ppl can chose if they want the function to or not
Maybe another poll would be a good idea.
-
I know that you have doubts or confusion about the lack of some coastlines, such as the lack of land in some areas, airports in the sea without land, and even some coastlines being square shaped. These issues were raised during the internal testing of aerofly fs global last year, which is still due to the lack of data, especially the lack of coastline data. There are many sources of data, but they can be used compliantly very little. Spending money to purchase data is a significant expense, so encouragement and understanding are important. They are still working hard to improve this planet
What other flight simulators can do, I hope the AeroflyFS will one day do. Even if there is a small price increase in the landscape subscription, it is worth it.
-
This is the coastline I have always dreamed of, with a very natural transition between the depth and color of the sea water. Thank you to the developers for their efforts, the best flight simulator,
Very good! It would be better if the great IPACS officials made all the coastline so natural and beautiful as soon as possible!
